Cargando…

Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis infection in cats is complicated by the difficulty associated with reliable detection of antigen in feline blood and serum samples. METHODS: To determine if antigen-antibody complex formation may interfere with detection of antigen in feline samples, we e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Little, Susan E, Raymond, Melissa R, Thomas, Jennifer E, Gruntmeir, Jeff, Hostetler, Joe A, Meinkoth, James H, Blagburn, Byron L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24411014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-1
_version_ 1782300020954890240
author Little, Susan E
Raymond, Melissa R
Thomas, Jennifer E
Gruntmeir, Jeff
Hostetler, Joe A
Meinkoth, James H
Blagburn, Byron L
author_facet Little, Susan E
Raymond, Melissa R
Thomas, Jennifer E
Gruntmeir, Jeff
Hostetler, Joe A
Meinkoth, James H
Blagburn, Byron L
author_sort Little, Susan E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis infection in cats is complicated by the difficulty associated with reliable detection of antigen in feline blood and serum samples. METHODS: To determine if antigen-antibody complex formation may interfere with detection of antigen in feline samples, we evaluated the performance of four different commercially available heartworm tests using serum samples from six cats experimentally infected with D. immitis and confirmed to harbor a low number of adult worms (mean = 2.0). Sera collected 168 (n = 6), 196 (n = 6), and 224 (n = 6) days post infection were tested both directly and following heat treatment. RESULTS: Antigen was detected in serum samples from 0 or 1 of 6 infected cats using the assays according to manufacturer’s directions, but after heat treatment of serum samples, as many as 5 of 6 cats had detectable antigen 6–8 months post infection. Antibodies to D. immitis were detected in all six infected cats by commercial in-clinic assay and at a reference laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that heat treatment of samples prior to testing can improve the sensitivity of antigen assays in feline patients, supporting more accurate diagnosis of this infection in cats. Surveys conducted by antigen testing without prior heat treatment of samples likely underestimate the true prevalence of infection in cats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3895812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38958122014-01-21 Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum Little, Susan E Raymond, Melissa R Thomas, Jennifer E Gruntmeir, Jeff Hostetler, Joe A Meinkoth, James H Blagburn, Byron L Parasit Vectors Research BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of Dirofilaria immitis infection in cats is complicated by the difficulty associated with reliable detection of antigen in feline blood and serum samples. METHODS: To determine if antigen-antibody complex formation may interfere with detection of antigen in feline samples, we evaluated the performance of four different commercially available heartworm tests using serum samples from six cats experimentally infected with D. immitis and confirmed to harbor a low number of adult worms (mean = 2.0). Sera collected 168 (n = 6), 196 (n = 6), and 224 (n = 6) days post infection were tested both directly and following heat treatment. RESULTS: Antigen was detected in serum samples from 0 or 1 of 6 infected cats using the assays according to manufacturer’s directions, but after heat treatment of serum samples, as many as 5 of 6 cats had detectable antigen 6–8 months post infection. Antibodies to D. immitis were detected in all six infected cats by commercial in-clinic assay and at a reference laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that heat treatment of samples prior to testing can improve the sensitivity of antigen assays in feline patients, supporting more accurate diagnosis of this infection in cats. Surveys conducted by antigen testing without prior heat treatment of samples likely underestimate the true prevalence of infection in cats. BioMed Central 2014-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3895812/ /pubmed/24411014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-1 Text en Copyright © 2014 Little et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Little, Susan E
Raymond, Melissa R
Thomas, Jennifer E
Gruntmeir, Jeff
Hostetler, Joe A
Meinkoth, James H
Blagburn, Byron L
Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum
title Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum
title_full Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum
title_fullStr Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum
title_full_unstemmed Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum
title_short Heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of Dirofilaria immitis in feline serum
title_sort heat treatment prior to testing allows detection of antigen of dirofilaria immitis in feline serum
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3895812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24411014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-3305-7-1
work_keys_str_mv AT littlesusane heattreatmentpriortotestingallowsdetectionofantigenofdirofilariaimmitisinfelineserum
AT raymondmelissar heattreatmentpriortotestingallowsdetectionofantigenofdirofilariaimmitisinfelineserum
AT thomasjennifere heattreatmentpriortotestingallowsdetectionofantigenofdirofilariaimmitisinfelineserum
AT gruntmeirjeff heattreatmentpriortotestingallowsdetectionofantigenofdirofilariaimmitisinfelineserum
AT hostetlerjoea heattreatmentpriortotestingallowsdetectionofantigenofdirofilariaimmitisinfelineserum
AT meinkothjamesh heattreatmentpriortotestingallowsdetectionofantigenofdirofilariaimmitisinfelineserum
AT blagburnbyronl heattreatmentpriortotestingallowsdetectionofantigenofdirofilariaimmitisinfelineserum