Cargando…

How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs

BACKGROUND: High levels of patient adherence to antimalarial treatment are important in ensuring drug effectiveness. To achieve this goal, it is important to understand levels of patient adherence, and the range of study designs and methodological challenges involved in measuring adherence and inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bruxvoort, Katia, Goodman, Catherine, Kachur, S. Patrick, Schellenberg, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084555
_version_ 1782300071202652160
author Bruxvoort, Katia
Goodman, Catherine
Kachur, S. Patrick
Schellenberg, David
author_facet Bruxvoort, Katia
Goodman, Catherine
Kachur, S. Patrick
Schellenberg, David
author_sort Bruxvoort, Katia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: High levels of patient adherence to antimalarial treatment are important in ensuring drug effectiveness. To achieve this goal, it is important to understand levels of patient adherence, and the range of study designs and methodological challenges involved in measuring adherence and interpreting results. Since antimalarial adherence was reviewed in 2004, there has been a major expansion in the use of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in the public sector, as well as initiatives to make them more widely accessible through community health workers and private retailers. These changes and the large number of recent adherence studies raise the need for an updated review on this topic. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting quantitative results on patient adherence to antimalarials obtained for treatment. RESULTS: The 55 studies identified reported extensive variation in patient adherence to antimalarials, with many studies reporting very high adherence (90–100%) and others finding adherence of less than 50%. We identified five overarching approaches to assessing adherence based on the definition of adherence and the methods used to measure it. Overall, there was no clear pattern in adherence results by approach. However, adherence tended to be higher among studies where informed consent was collected at the time of obtaining the drug, where patient consultations were directly observed by research staff, and where a diagnostic test was obtained. CONCLUSION: Variations in reported adherence may reflect factors related to patient characteristics and the nature of their consultation with the provider, as well as methodological variations such as interaction between the research team and patients before and during the treatment. Future studies can benefit from an awareness of the impact of study procedures on adherence outcomes, and the identification of improved measurement methods less dependent on self-report.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3896377
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38963772014-01-24 How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs Bruxvoort, Katia Goodman, Catherine Kachur, S. Patrick Schellenberg, David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: High levels of patient adherence to antimalarial treatment are important in ensuring drug effectiveness. To achieve this goal, it is important to understand levels of patient adherence, and the range of study designs and methodological challenges involved in measuring adherence and interpreting results. Since antimalarial adherence was reviewed in 2004, there has been a major expansion in the use of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in the public sector, as well as initiatives to make them more widely accessible through community health workers and private retailers. These changes and the large number of recent adherence studies raise the need for an updated review on this topic. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting quantitative results on patient adherence to antimalarials obtained for treatment. RESULTS: The 55 studies identified reported extensive variation in patient adherence to antimalarials, with many studies reporting very high adherence (90–100%) and others finding adherence of less than 50%. We identified five overarching approaches to assessing adherence based on the definition of adherence and the methods used to measure it. Overall, there was no clear pattern in adherence results by approach. However, adherence tended to be higher among studies where informed consent was collected at the time of obtaining the drug, where patient consultations were directly observed by research staff, and where a diagnostic test was obtained. CONCLUSION: Variations in reported adherence may reflect factors related to patient characteristics and the nature of their consultation with the provider, as well as methodological variations such as interaction between the research team and patients before and during the treatment. Future studies can benefit from an awareness of the impact of study procedures on adherence outcomes, and the identification of improved measurement methods less dependent on self-report. Public Library of Science 2014-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3896377/ /pubmed/24465418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084555 Text en © 2014 Bruxvoort et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bruxvoort, Katia
Goodman, Catherine
Kachur, S. Patrick
Schellenberg, David
How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs
title How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs
title_full How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs
title_fullStr How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs
title_full_unstemmed How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs
title_short How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs
title_sort how patients take malaria treatment: a systematic review of the literature on adherence to antimalarial drugs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896377/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465418
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084555
work_keys_str_mv AT bruxvoortkatia howpatientstakemalariatreatmentasystematicreviewoftheliteratureonadherencetoantimalarialdrugs
AT goodmancatherine howpatientstakemalariatreatmentasystematicreviewoftheliteratureonadherencetoantimalarialdrugs
AT kachurspatrick howpatientstakemalariatreatmentasystematicreviewoftheliteratureonadherencetoantimalarialdrugs
AT schellenbergdavid howpatientstakemalariatreatmentasystematicreviewoftheliteratureonadherencetoantimalarialdrugs