Cargando…
How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs
BACKGROUND: High levels of patient adherence to antimalarial treatment are important in ensuring drug effectiveness. To achieve this goal, it is important to understand levels of patient adherence, and the range of study designs and methodological challenges involved in measuring adherence and inter...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084555 |
_version_ | 1782300071202652160 |
---|---|
author | Bruxvoort, Katia Goodman, Catherine Kachur, S. Patrick Schellenberg, David |
author_facet | Bruxvoort, Katia Goodman, Catherine Kachur, S. Patrick Schellenberg, David |
author_sort | Bruxvoort, Katia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: High levels of patient adherence to antimalarial treatment are important in ensuring drug effectiveness. To achieve this goal, it is important to understand levels of patient adherence, and the range of study designs and methodological challenges involved in measuring adherence and interpreting results. Since antimalarial adherence was reviewed in 2004, there has been a major expansion in the use of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in the public sector, as well as initiatives to make them more widely accessible through community health workers and private retailers. These changes and the large number of recent adherence studies raise the need for an updated review on this topic. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting quantitative results on patient adherence to antimalarials obtained for treatment. RESULTS: The 55 studies identified reported extensive variation in patient adherence to antimalarials, with many studies reporting very high adherence (90–100%) and others finding adherence of less than 50%. We identified five overarching approaches to assessing adherence based on the definition of adherence and the methods used to measure it. Overall, there was no clear pattern in adherence results by approach. However, adherence tended to be higher among studies where informed consent was collected at the time of obtaining the drug, where patient consultations were directly observed by research staff, and where a diagnostic test was obtained. CONCLUSION: Variations in reported adherence may reflect factors related to patient characteristics and the nature of their consultation with the provider, as well as methodological variations such as interaction between the research team and patients before and during the treatment. Future studies can benefit from an awareness of the impact of study procedures on adherence outcomes, and the identification of improved measurement methods less dependent on self-report. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3896377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38963772014-01-24 How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs Bruxvoort, Katia Goodman, Catherine Kachur, S. Patrick Schellenberg, David PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: High levels of patient adherence to antimalarial treatment are important in ensuring drug effectiveness. To achieve this goal, it is important to understand levels of patient adherence, and the range of study designs and methodological challenges involved in measuring adherence and interpreting results. Since antimalarial adherence was reviewed in 2004, there has been a major expansion in the use of artemisinin-based combination therapies (ACTs) in the public sector, as well as initiatives to make them more widely accessible through community health workers and private retailers. These changes and the large number of recent adherence studies raise the need for an updated review on this topic. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting quantitative results on patient adherence to antimalarials obtained for treatment. RESULTS: The 55 studies identified reported extensive variation in patient adherence to antimalarials, with many studies reporting very high adherence (90–100%) and others finding adherence of less than 50%. We identified five overarching approaches to assessing adherence based on the definition of adherence and the methods used to measure it. Overall, there was no clear pattern in adherence results by approach. However, adherence tended to be higher among studies where informed consent was collected at the time of obtaining the drug, where patient consultations were directly observed by research staff, and where a diagnostic test was obtained. CONCLUSION: Variations in reported adherence may reflect factors related to patient characteristics and the nature of their consultation with the provider, as well as methodological variations such as interaction between the research team and patients before and during the treatment. Future studies can benefit from an awareness of the impact of study procedures on adherence outcomes, and the identification of improved measurement methods less dependent on self-report. Public Library of Science 2014-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3896377/ /pubmed/24465418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084555 Text en © 2014 Bruxvoort et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bruxvoort, Katia Goodman, Catherine Kachur, S. Patrick Schellenberg, David How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs |
title | How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs |
title_full | How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs |
title_fullStr | How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs |
title_full_unstemmed | How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs |
title_short | How Patients Take Malaria Treatment: A Systematic Review of the Literature on Adherence to Antimalarial Drugs |
title_sort | how patients take malaria treatment: a systematic review of the literature on adherence to antimalarial drugs |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465418 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084555 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bruxvoortkatia howpatientstakemalariatreatmentasystematicreviewoftheliteratureonadherencetoantimalarialdrugs AT goodmancatherine howpatientstakemalariatreatmentasystematicreviewoftheliteratureonadherencetoantimalarialdrugs AT kachurspatrick howpatientstakemalariatreatmentasystematicreviewoftheliteratureonadherencetoantimalarialdrugs AT schellenbergdavid howpatientstakemalariatreatmentasystematicreviewoftheliteratureonadherencetoantimalarialdrugs |