Cargando…

Detection of Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Stool DNA Testing: Comparison with Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Occult Blood (FIT)

OBJECTIVES: Precursors to 1/3 of colorectal cancer (CRC), serrated polyps have been under-detected by screening due to their inconspicuous, non-hemorrhagic, and proximal nature. A new multi-target stool DNA test (multi-target sDNA) shows high sensitivity for both CRC and advanced adenomas. Screen de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heigh, Russell I., Yab, Tracy C., Taylor, William R., Hussain, Fareeda T. N., Smyrk, Thomas C., Mahoney, Douglas W., Domanico, Michael J., Berger, Barry M., Lidgard, Graham P., Ahlquist, David A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085659
_version_ 1782300079475916800
author Heigh, Russell I.
Yab, Tracy C.
Taylor, William R.
Hussain, Fareeda T. N.
Smyrk, Thomas C.
Mahoney, Douglas W.
Domanico, Michael J.
Berger, Barry M.
Lidgard, Graham P.
Ahlquist, David A.
author_facet Heigh, Russell I.
Yab, Tracy C.
Taylor, William R.
Hussain, Fareeda T. N.
Smyrk, Thomas C.
Mahoney, Douglas W.
Domanico, Michael J.
Berger, Barry M.
Lidgard, Graham P.
Ahlquist, David A.
author_sort Heigh, Russell I.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Precursors to 1/3 of colorectal cancer (CRC), serrated polyps have been under-detected by screening due to their inconspicuous, non-hemorrhagic, and proximal nature. A new multi-target stool DNA test (multi-target sDNA) shows high sensitivity for both CRC and advanced adenomas. Screen detection of serrated polyps by this approach requires further validation. We sought to assess and compare noninvasive detection of sessile serrated polyps (SSP) ≥1 cm by sDNA and an occult blood fecal immunochemical test (FIT). METHODS: In a blinded prospective study, a single stool sample used for both tests was collected from 456 asymptomatic adults prior to screening or surveillance colonoscopy (criterion standard). All 29 patients with SSP≥1 cm were included as cases and all 232 with no neoplastic findings as controls. Buffered stool samples were processed and frozen on receipt; Exact Sciences performed sDNA in batches using optimized analytical methods. The sDNA multi-marker panel targets methylated BMP3 (mBMP3) and NDRG4, mutant KRAS, β-actin, and hemoglobin. FIT (Polymedco OC-FIT Check) was performed in separate lab ≤2 days post defecation and evaluated at cutoffs of 50 (FIT-50) and 100 ng/ml (FIT-100). RESULTS: Median ages: cases 61 (range 57–77), controls 62 (52–70), p = NS. Women comprised 59% and 51%, p = NS, respectively. SSP median size was 1.2 cm (1–3 cm), 93% were proximal, and 64% had synchronous diminutive polyps. Among multi-target sDNA markers, mBMP3 proved highly discriminant for detection of SSP≥1 cm (AUC = 0.87, p<0.00001); other DNA markers provided no incremental sensitivity. Hemoglobin alone showed no discrimination (AUC = 0.50, p = NS). At matched specificities, detection of SSP≥1 cm by stool mBMP3 was significantly greater than by FIT-50 (66% vs 10%, p = 0.0003) or FIT-100 (63% vs 0%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a screening and surveillance setting, SSP≥1 cm can be detected noninvasively by stool assay of exfoliated DNA markers, especially mBMP3. FIT appears to have no value in SSP detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3896420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38964202014-01-24 Detection of Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Stool DNA Testing: Comparison with Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Occult Blood (FIT) Heigh, Russell I. Yab, Tracy C. Taylor, William R. Hussain, Fareeda T. N. Smyrk, Thomas C. Mahoney, Douglas W. Domanico, Michael J. Berger, Barry M. Lidgard, Graham P. Ahlquist, David A. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: Precursors to 1/3 of colorectal cancer (CRC), serrated polyps have been under-detected by screening due to their inconspicuous, non-hemorrhagic, and proximal nature. A new multi-target stool DNA test (multi-target sDNA) shows high sensitivity for both CRC and advanced adenomas. Screen detection of serrated polyps by this approach requires further validation. We sought to assess and compare noninvasive detection of sessile serrated polyps (SSP) ≥1 cm by sDNA and an occult blood fecal immunochemical test (FIT). METHODS: In a blinded prospective study, a single stool sample used for both tests was collected from 456 asymptomatic adults prior to screening or surveillance colonoscopy (criterion standard). All 29 patients with SSP≥1 cm were included as cases and all 232 with no neoplastic findings as controls. Buffered stool samples were processed and frozen on receipt; Exact Sciences performed sDNA in batches using optimized analytical methods. The sDNA multi-marker panel targets methylated BMP3 (mBMP3) and NDRG4, mutant KRAS, β-actin, and hemoglobin. FIT (Polymedco OC-FIT Check) was performed in separate lab ≤2 days post defecation and evaluated at cutoffs of 50 (FIT-50) and 100 ng/ml (FIT-100). RESULTS: Median ages: cases 61 (range 57–77), controls 62 (52–70), p = NS. Women comprised 59% and 51%, p = NS, respectively. SSP median size was 1.2 cm (1–3 cm), 93% were proximal, and 64% had synchronous diminutive polyps. Among multi-target sDNA markers, mBMP3 proved highly discriminant for detection of SSP≥1 cm (AUC = 0.87, p<0.00001); other DNA markers provided no incremental sensitivity. Hemoglobin alone showed no discrimination (AUC = 0.50, p = NS). At matched specificities, detection of SSP≥1 cm by stool mBMP3 was significantly greater than by FIT-50 (66% vs 10%, p = 0.0003) or FIT-100 (63% vs 0%, p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a screening and surveillance setting, SSP≥1 cm can be detected noninvasively by stool assay of exfoliated DNA markers, especially mBMP3. FIT appears to have no value in SSP detection. Public Library of Science 2014-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3896420/ /pubmed/24465639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085659 Text en © 2014 Heigh et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Heigh, Russell I.
Yab, Tracy C.
Taylor, William R.
Hussain, Fareeda T. N.
Smyrk, Thomas C.
Mahoney, Douglas W.
Domanico, Michael J.
Berger, Barry M.
Lidgard, Graham P.
Ahlquist, David A.
Detection of Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Stool DNA Testing: Comparison with Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Occult Blood (FIT)
title Detection of Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Stool DNA Testing: Comparison with Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Occult Blood (FIT)
title_full Detection of Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Stool DNA Testing: Comparison with Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Occult Blood (FIT)
title_fullStr Detection of Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Stool DNA Testing: Comparison with Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Occult Blood (FIT)
title_full_unstemmed Detection of Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Stool DNA Testing: Comparison with Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Occult Blood (FIT)
title_short Detection of Colorectal Serrated Polyps by Stool DNA Testing: Comparison with Fecal Immunochemical Testing for Occult Blood (FIT)
title_sort detection of colorectal serrated polyps by stool dna testing: comparison with fecal immunochemical testing for occult blood (fit)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085659
work_keys_str_mv AT heighrusselli detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT yabtracyc detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT taylorwilliamr detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT hussainfareedatn detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT smyrkthomasc detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT mahoneydouglasw detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT domanicomichaelj detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT bergerbarrym detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT lidgardgrahamp detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit
AT ahlquistdavida detectionofcolorectalserratedpolypsbystooldnatestingcomparisonwithfecalimmunochemicaltestingforoccultbloodfit