Cargando…

KRAS Early Testing: Consensus Initiative and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for Metastatic Colorectal Patients in an Italian Setting

KRAS testing is relevant for the choice of the most appropriate first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Strategies for preventing unequal access to the test should be implemented, but their relevance in the practice is related to economic sustainability. The study adopted the Delph...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barone, Carlo, Pinto, Carmine, Normanno, Nicola, Capussotti, Lorenzo, Cognetti, Francesco, Falcone, Alfredo, Mantovani, Lorenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085897
_version_ 1782300080164831232
author Barone, Carlo
Pinto, Carmine
Normanno, Nicola
Capussotti, Lorenzo
Cognetti, Francesco
Falcone, Alfredo
Mantovani, Lorenzo
author_facet Barone, Carlo
Pinto, Carmine
Normanno, Nicola
Capussotti, Lorenzo
Cognetti, Francesco
Falcone, Alfredo
Mantovani, Lorenzo
author_sort Barone, Carlo
collection PubMed
description KRAS testing is relevant for the choice of the most appropriate first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Strategies for preventing unequal access to the test should be implemented, but their relevance in the practice is related to economic sustainability. The study adopted the Delphi technique to reach a consensus on several topics. Issues related to execution of KRAS testing were identified by an expert’s board and proposed to 108 Italian oncologists and pathologists through two subsequent questionnaires. The emerging proposal was evaluated by decision analyses models employed by technology assessment agencies in order to assess cost-effectiveness. Alternative therapeutic strategies included most commonly used chemotherapy regimens alone or in combination with cetuximab or bevacizumab. The survey indicated that time interval for obtaining KRAS test should not exceed 15 days, 10 days being an optimal interval. To assure the access to proper treatment, a useful strategy should be to anticipate the test after radical resection in patients at high risk of relapse. Early KRAS testing in high risk CRC patients generates incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between 6,000 and 13,000 Euro per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. In extensive sensitivity analyses ICER’s were always below 15,000 Euro per QALY gained, far within the threshold of 60,000 Euro/QALY gained accepted by regulatory institutions in Italy. In metastatic CRC a time interval higher than 15 days for result of KRAS testing limits access to therapeutic choices. Anticipating KRAS testing before the onset of metastatic disease in patients at high risk does not affect the sustainability and cost-effectiveness profile of cetuximab in first-line mCRC. Early KRAS testing may prevent this inequality in high-risk patients, whether they develop metastases, and is a cost-effective strategy. Based on these results, present joined recommendations of Italian societies of Oncology and Pathology should be updated including early KRAS testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3896423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38964232014-01-24 KRAS Early Testing: Consensus Initiative and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for Metastatic Colorectal Patients in an Italian Setting Barone, Carlo Pinto, Carmine Normanno, Nicola Capussotti, Lorenzo Cognetti, Francesco Falcone, Alfredo Mantovani, Lorenzo PLoS One Research Article KRAS testing is relevant for the choice of the most appropriate first-line therapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Strategies for preventing unequal access to the test should be implemented, but their relevance in the practice is related to economic sustainability. The study adopted the Delphi technique to reach a consensus on several topics. Issues related to execution of KRAS testing were identified by an expert’s board and proposed to 108 Italian oncologists and pathologists through two subsequent questionnaires. The emerging proposal was evaluated by decision analyses models employed by technology assessment agencies in order to assess cost-effectiveness. Alternative therapeutic strategies included most commonly used chemotherapy regimens alone or in combination with cetuximab or bevacizumab. The survey indicated that time interval for obtaining KRAS test should not exceed 15 days, 10 days being an optimal interval. To assure the access to proper treatment, a useful strategy should be to anticipate the test after radical resection in patients at high risk of relapse. Early KRAS testing in high risk CRC patients generates incremental cost-effectiveness ratios between 6,000 and 13,000 Euro per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained. In extensive sensitivity analyses ICER’s were always below 15,000 Euro per QALY gained, far within the threshold of 60,000 Euro/QALY gained accepted by regulatory institutions in Italy. In metastatic CRC a time interval higher than 15 days for result of KRAS testing limits access to therapeutic choices. Anticipating KRAS testing before the onset of metastatic disease in patients at high risk does not affect the sustainability and cost-effectiveness profile of cetuximab in first-line mCRC. Early KRAS testing may prevent this inequality in high-risk patients, whether they develop metastases, and is a cost-effective strategy. Based on these results, present joined recommendations of Italian societies of Oncology and Pathology should be updated including early KRAS testing. Public Library of Science 2014-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3896423/ /pubmed/24465771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085897 Text en © 2014 Barone et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barone, Carlo
Pinto, Carmine
Normanno, Nicola
Capussotti, Lorenzo
Cognetti, Francesco
Falcone, Alfredo
Mantovani, Lorenzo
KRAS Early Testing: Consensus Initiative and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for Metastatic Colorectal Patients in an Italian Setting
title KRAS Early Testing: Consensus Initiative and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for Metastatic Colorectal Patients in an Italian Setting
title_full KRAS Early Testing: Consensus Initiative and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for Metastatic Colorectal Patients in an Italian Setting
title_fullStr KRAS Early Testing: Consensus Initiative and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for Metastatic Colorectal Patients in an Italian Setting
title_full_unstemmed KRAS Early Testing: Consensus Initiative and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for Metastatic Colorectal Patients in an Italian Setting
title_short KRAS Early Testing: Consensus Initiative and Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation for Metastatic Colorectal Patients in an Italian Setting
title_sort kras early testing: consensus initiative and cost-effectiveness evaluation for metastatic colorectal patients in an italian setting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085897
work_keys_str_mv AT baronecarlo krasearlytestingconsensusinitiativeandcosteffectivenessevaluationformetastaticcolorectalpatientsinanitaliansetting
AT pintocarmine krasearlytestingconsensusinitiativeandcosteffectivenessevaluationformetastaticcolorectalpatientsinanitaliansetting
AT normannonicola krasearlytestingconsensusinitiativeandcosteffectivenessevaluationformetastaticcolorectalpatientsinanitaliansetting
AT capussottilorenzo krasearlytestingconsensusinitiativeandcosteffectivenessevaluationformetastaticcolorectalpatientsinanitaliansetting
AT cognettifrancesco krasearlytestingconsensusinitiativeandcosteffectivenessevaluationformetastaticcolorectalpatientsinanitaliansetting
AT falconealfredo krasearlytestingconsensusinitiativeandcosteffectivenessevaluationformetastaticcolorectalpatientsinanitaliansetting
AT mantovanilorenzo krasearlytestingconsensusinitiativeandcosteffectivenessevaluationformetastaticcolorectalpatientsinanitaliansetting