Cargando…
Engaging Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU Participatory Action Research Project (PICU-PAR)
BACKGROUND: Despite considerable efforts, engaging staff to lead quality improvement activities in practice settings is a persistent challenge. At British Columbia Children’s Hospital (BCCH), the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) undertook a new phase of quality improvement actions based on the C...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24401288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-6 |
_version_ | 1782300142257307648 |
---|---|
author | Collet, Jean-Paul Skippen, Peter W Mosavianpour, Mir Kaber Pitfield, Alexander Chakraborty, Bubli Hunte, Garth Lindstrom, Ronald Kissoon, Niranjan McKellin, William H |
author_facet | Collet, Jean-Paul Skippen, Peter W Mosavianpour, Mir Kaber Pitfield, Alexander Chakraborty, Bubli Hunte, Garth Lindstrom, Ronald Kissoon, Niranjan McKellin, William H |
author_sort | Collet, Jean-Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Despite considerable efforts, engaging staff to lead quality improvement activities in practice settings is a persistent challenge. At British Columbia Children’s Hospital (BCCH), the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) undertook a new phase of quality improvement actions based on the Community of Practice (CoP) model with Participatory Action Research (PAR). This approach aims to mobilize the PICU ‘community’ as a whole with a focus on practice; namely, to create a ‘community of practice’ to support reflection, learning, and innovation in everyday work. METHODOLOGY: An iterative two-stage PAR process using mixed methods has been developed among the PICU CoP to describe the environment (stage 1) and implement specific interventions (stage 2). Stage 1 is ethnographic description of the unit’s care practice. Surveys, interviews, focus groups, and direct observations describe the clinical staff’s experiences and perspectives around bedside care and quality endeavors in the PICU. Contrasts and comparisons across participants, time and activities help understanding the PICU culture and experience. Stage 2 is a succession of PAR spirals, using results from phase 1 to set up specific interventions aimed at building the staff’s capability to conduct QI projects while acquiring appropriate technical skills and leadership capacity (primary outcome). Team communication, information, and interaction will be enhanced through a knowledge exchange (KE) and a wireless network of iPADs. RELEVANCE: Lack of leadership at the staff level in order to improve daily practice is a recognized challenge that faces many hospitals. We believe that the PAR approach within a highly motivated CoP is a sound method to create the social dynamic and cultural context within which clinical teams can grow, reflect, innovate and feel proud to better serve patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3896821 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38968212014-01-22 Engaging Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU Participatory Action Research Project (PICU-PAR) Collet, Jean-Paul Skippen, Peter W Mosavianpour, Mir Kaber Pitfield, Alexander Chakraborty, Bubli Hunte, Garth Lindstrom, Ronald Kissoon, Niranjan McKellin, William H Implement Sci Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite considerable efforts, engaging staff to lead quality improvement activities in practice settings is a persistent challenge. At British Columbia Children’s Hospital (BCCH), the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) undertook a new phase of quality improvement actions based on the Community of Practice (CoP) model with Participatory Action Research (PAR). This approach aims to mobilize the PICU ‘community’ as a whole with a focus on practice; namely, to create a ‘community of practice’ to support reflection, learning, and innovation in everyday work. METHODOLOGY: An iterative two-stage PAR process using mixed methods has been developed among the PICU CoP to describe the environment (stage 1) and implement specific interventions (stage 2). Stage 1 is ethnographic description of the unit’s care practice. Surveys, interviews, focus groups, and direct observations describe the clinical staff’s experiences and perspectives around bedside care and quality endeavors in the PICU. Contrasts and comparisons across participants, time and activities help understanding the PICU culture and experience. Stage 2 is a succession of PAR spirals, using results from phase 1 to set up specific interventions aimed at building the staff’s capability to conduct QI projects while acquiring appropriate technical skills and leadership capacity (primary outcome). Team communication, information, and interaction will be enhanced through a knowledge exchange (KE) and a wireless network of iPADs. RELEVANCE: Lack of leadership at the staff level in order to improve daily practice is a recognized challenge that faces many hospitals. We believe that the PAR approach within a highly motivated CoP is a sound method to create the social dynamic and cultural context within which clinical teams can grow, reflect, innovate and feel proud to better serve patients. BioMed Central 2014-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3896821/ /pubmed/24401288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-6 Text en Copyright © 2014 Collet et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Collet, Jean-Paul Skippen, Peter W Mosavianpour, Mir Kaber Pitfield, Alexander Chakraborty, Bubli Hunte, Garth Lindstrom, Ronald Kissoon, Niranjan McKellin, William H Engaging Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU Participatory Action Research Project (PICU-PAR) |
title | Engaging Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU Participatory Action Research Project (PICU-PAR) |
title_full | Engaging Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU Participatory Action Research Project (PICU-PAR) |
title_fullStr | Engaging Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU Participatory Action Research Project (PICU-PAR) |
title_full_unstemmed | Engaging Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU Participatory Action Research Project (PICU-PAR) |
title_short | Engaging Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the PICU Participatory Action Research Project (PICU-PAR) |
title_sort | engaging pediatric intensive care unit (picu) clinical staff to lead practice improvement: the picu participatory action research project (picu-par) |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3896821/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24401288 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-9-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT colletjeanpaul engagingpediatricintensivecareunitpicuclinicalstafftoleadpracticeimprovementthepicuparticipatoryactionresearchprojectpicupar AT skippenpeterw engagingpediatricintensivecareunitpicuclinicalstafftoleadpracticeimprovementthepicuparticipatoryactionresearchprojectpicupar AT mosavianpourmirkaber engagingpediatricintensivecareunitpicuclinicalstafftoleadpracticeimprovementthepicuparticipatoryactionresearchprojectpicupar AT pitfieldalexander engagingpediatricintensivecareunitpicuclinicalstafftoleadpracticeimprovementthepicuparticipatoryactionresearchprojectpicupar AT chakrabortybubli engagingpediatricintensivecareunitpicuclinicalstafftoleadpracticeimprovementthepicuparticipatoryactionresearchprojectpicupar AT huntegarth engagingpediatricintensivecareunitpicuclinicalstafftoleadpracticeimprovementthepicuparticipatoryactionresearchprojectpicupar AT lindstromronald engagingpediatricintensivecareunitpicuclinicalstafftoleadpracticeimprovementthepicuparticipatoryactionresearchprojectpicupar AT kissoonniranjan engagingpediatricintensivecareunitpicuclinicalstafftoleadpracticeimprovementthepicuparticipatoryactionresearchprojectpicupar AT mckellinwilliamh engagingpediatricintensivecareunitpicuclinicalstafftoleadpracticeimprovementthepicuparticipatoryactionresearchprojectpicupar |