Cargando…
Managing caliceal stones
The natural course of untreated asymptomatic caliceal calculi has not been clearly defined, especially in terms of disease progression, and the indications for and outcomes of surgical intervention are not precise. Caliceal stones may remain asymptomatic but, in case of migration, ureteral calculi c...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3897062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497690 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.124214 |
_version_ | 1782300182347513856 |
---|---|
author | Gross, Andreas J. Knipper, Sophie Netsch, Christopher |
author_facet | Gross, Andreas J. Knipper, Sophie Netsch, Christopher |
author_sort | Gross, Andreas J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The natural course of untreated asymptomatic caliceal calculi has not been clearly defined, especially in terms of disease progression, and the indications for and outcomes of surgical intervention are not precise. Caliceal stones may remain asymptomatic but, in case of migration, ureteral calculi can cause acute ureteric colic with severe complications. The decision for an active treatment of caliceal calculi is based on stone composition, stone size and symptoms. Extracorporal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has a low complication rate and is recommended by the current guidelines of the European Association of Urology as a first-line therapy for the treatment of caliceal stones <2 cm in diameter. However, immediate stone removal is not achieved with ESWL. The primary stone-free rates (SFR) after ESWL depend on stone site and composition and, especially for lower pole calculi, the SFR differ widely from other caliceal stones. Minimally-invasive procedures including percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy are alternatives for the treatment of caliceal stones, associated with low morbidity and high primary SFR when performed in centers of excellence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3897062 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38970622014-02-04 Managing caliceal stones Gross, Andreas J. Knipper, Sophie Netsch, Christopher Indian J Urol Symposium The natural course of untreated asymptomatic caliceal calculi has not been clearly defined, especially in terms of disease progression, and the indications for and outcomes of surgical intervention are not precise. Caliceal stones may remain asymptomatic but, in case of migration, ureteral calculi can cause acute ureteric colic with severe complications. The decision for an active treatment of caliceal calculi is based on stone composition, stone size and symptoms. Extracorporal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) has a low complication rate and is recommended by the current guidelines of the European Association of Urology as a first-line therapy for the treatment of caliceal stones <2 cm in diameter. However, immediate stone removal is not achieved with ESWL. The primary stone-free rates (SFR) after ESWL depend on stone site and composition and, especially for lower pole calculi, the SFR differ widely from other caliceal stones. Minimally-invasive procedures including percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopy are alternatives for the treatment of caliceal stones, associated with low morbidity and high primary SFR when performed in centers of excellence. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3897062/ /pubmed/24497690 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.124214 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Urology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Symposium Gross, Andreas J. Knipper, Sophie Netsch, Christopher Managing caliceal stones |
title | Managing caliceal stones |
title_full | Managing caliceal stones |
title_fullStr | Managing caliceal stones |
title_full_unstemmed | Managing caliceal stones |
title_short | Managing caliceal stones |
title_sort | managing caliceal stones |
topic | Symposium |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3897062/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497690 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-1591.124214 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT grossandreasj managingcalicealstones AT knippersophie managingcalicealstones AT netschchristopher managingcalicealstones |