Cargando…
Laparoendoscopic Management of Midureteral Strictures
The incidence of ureteral strictures has increased worldwide owing to the widespread use of laparoscopic and endourologic procedures. Midureteral strictures can be managed by either an endoscopic approach or surgical reconstruction, including open or minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) techniq...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Urological Association
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3897625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24466390 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.1.2 |
_version_ | 1782300269441187840 |
---|---|
author | Komninos, Christos Koo, Kyo Chul Rha, Koon Ho |
author_facet | Komninos, Christos Koo, Kyo Chul Rha, Koon Ho |
author_sort | Komninos, Christos |
collection | PubMed |
description | The incidence of ureteral strictures has increased worldwide owing to the widespread use of laparoscopic and endourologic procedures. Midureteral strictures can be managed by either an endoscopic approach or surgical reconstruction, including open or minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) techniques. Minimally invasive surgical ureteral reconstruction is gaining in popularity in the management of midureteral strictures. However, only a few studies have been published so far regarding the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and robotic ureteral reconstruction procedures. Nevertheless, most of the studies have reported at least equivalent outcomes with the open approach. In general, strictures more than 2 cm, injury strictures, and strictures associated either with radiation or with reduced renal function of less than 25% may be managed more appropriately by minimally invasive surgical reconstruction, although the evidence to establish these recommendations is not yet adequate. Defects of 2 to 3 cm in length may be treated with laparoscopic or robot-assisted uretero-ureterostomy, whereas defects of 12 to 15 cm may be managed either via ureteral reimplantation with a Boari flap or via transuretero-ureterostomy in case of low bladder capacity. Cases with more extended defects can be reconstructed with the incorporation of the ileum in ureteral repair. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3897625 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Urological Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38976252014-01-24 Laparoendoscopic Management of Midureteral Strictures Komninos, Christos Koo, Kyo Chul Rha, Koon Ho Korean J Urol Review Article The incidence of ureteral strictures has increased worldwide owing to the widespread use of laparoscopic and endourologic procedures. Midureteral strictures can be managed by either an endoscopic approach or surgical reconstruction, including open or minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic) techniques. Minimally invasive surgical ureteral reconstruction is gaining in popularity in the management of midureteral strictures. However, only a few studies have been published so far regarding the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic and robotic ureteral reconstruction procedures. Nevertheless, most of the studies have reported at least equivalent outcomes with the open approach. In general, strictures more than 2 cm, injury strictures, and strictures associated either with radiation or with reduced renal function of less than 25% may be managed more appropriately by minimally invasive surgical reconstruction, although the evidence to establish these recommendations is not yet adequate. Defects of 2 to 3 cm in length may be treated with laparoscopic or robot-assisted uretero-ureterostomy, whereas defects of 12 to 15 cm may be managed either via ureteral reimplantation with a Boari flap or via transuretero-ureterostomy in case of low bladder capacity. Cases with more extended defects can be reconstructed with the incorporation of the ileum in ureteral repair. The Korean Urological Association 2014-01 2014-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3897625/ /pubmed/24466390 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.1.2 Text en © The Korean Urological Association, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Komninos, Christos Koo, Kyo Chul Rha, Koon Ho Laparoendoscopic Management of Midureteral Strictures |
title | Laparoendoscopic Management of Midureteral Strictures |
title_full | Laparoendoscopic Management of Midureteral Strictures |
title_fullStr | Laparoendoscopic Management of Midureteral Strictures |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoendoscopic Management of Midureteral Strictures |
title_short | Laparoendoscopic Management of Midureteral Strictures |
title_sort | laparoendoscopic management of midureteral strictures |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3897625/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24466390 http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2014.55.1.2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT komninoschristos laparoendoscopicmanagementofmidureteralstrictures AT kookyochul laparoendoscopicmanagementofmidureteralstrictures AT rhakoonho laparoendoscopicmanagementofmidureteralstrictures |