Cargando…

Oral bisphosphonates do not increase the risk of severe upper gastrointestinal complications: a nested case–control study

BACKGROUND: Data on the effect of oral bisphosphonates (BPs) on risk of upper gastrointestinal complications (UGIC) are conflicting. We conducted a large population-based study from a network of Italian healthcare utilization databases aimed to assess the UGIC risk associated with use of BPs in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghirardi, Arianna, Scotti, Lorenza, Vedova, Gianluca Della, D’Oro, Luca Cavalieri, Lapi, Francesco, Cipriani, Francesco, Caputi, Achille P, Vaccheri, Alberto, Gregori, Dario, Gesuita, Rosaria, Vestri, Annarita, Staniscia, Tommaso, Mazzaglia, Giampiero, Corrao, Giovanni
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3897893/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24397769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-14-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Data on the effect of oral bisphosphonates (BPs) on risk of upper gastrointestinal complications (UGIC) are conflicting. We conducted a large population-based study from a network of Italian healthcare utilization databases aimed to assess the UGIC risk associated with use of BPs in the setting of secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures. METHODS: A nested case–control study was carried out within a cohort of 68,970 patients aged 45 years or older, who have been hospitalized for osteoporotic fracture from 2003 until 2005. Cases were the 804 patients who experienced hospitalization for UGIC until 2007. Up to 20 controls were randomly selected for each case. Conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) associated with current and past use of BPs (i.e. for drug dispensation within 30 days and over 31 days prior the outcome onset, respectively) after adjusting for several covariates. RESULTS: Compared with patients who did not use BPs, current and past users had OR (and 95% confidence interval) of 0.86 (0.60 to 1.22) and 1.07 (0.80 to 1.44) respectively. There was no difference in the ORs estimated according with BPs type (alendronate or risedronate) and regimen (daily or weekly), nor with co-therapies and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Further evidence that BPs dispensed for secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures are not associated with increased risk of severe gastrointestinal complications is supplied from this study. Further research is required to clarify the role BPs and other drugs of co-medication in inducing UGIC.