Cargando…
Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: prospective observational study
BACKGROUND: For women at low risk of childbirth complications, water immersion during labour is a care option in many high income countries. Our aims were (a) to describe maternal characteristics, intrapartum events, interventions, maternal and neonatal outcomes for all women who used a birthing poo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3897991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-17 |
_version_ | 1782300338015961088 |
---|---|
author | Henderson, Jane Burns, Ethel E Regalia, Anna L Casarico, Giovanna Boulton, Mary G Smith, Lesley A |
author_facet | Henderson, Jane Burns, Ethel E Regalia, Anna L Casarico, Giovanna Boulton, Mary G Smith, Lesley A |
author_sort | Henderson, Jane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: For women at low risk of childbirth complications, water immersion during labour is a care option in many high income countries. Our aims were (a) to describe maternal characteristics, intrapartum events, interventions, maternal and neonatal outcomes for all women who used a birthing pool during labour who either had a waterbirth or left the pool and had a landbirth, and for the subgroup of women who had a waterbirth in 19 obstetric units, and (b) to compare maternal characteristics, intrapartum events, interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes for women who used a birthing pool with a control group of women who did not use a birthing pool for whom we prospectively collected data in a single centre. METHODS: Prospective observational study in 19 Italian obstetric units 2002-2005. Participants were: (a) 2,505 women in labour using a birthing pool in 19 obstetric units; and (b) 114 women in labour using a birthing pool and 459 women who did not use a birthing pool in one obstetric unit. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the sample as a whole and, separately, for those women who gave birth in water. Categorical data were compared using Chi square statistics and continuous data by T-tests. RESULTS: Overall, 95.6% of women using a birthing pool had a spontaneous vertex delivery, 63.9% of which occurred in water. Half of nulliparas and three quarters of multiparas delivered in water. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were rare. There were two cases of umbilical cord snap with waterbirth. Compared with controls, significantly more women who used a birthing pool adopted an upright birth position, had hands off delivery technique, and a physiological third stage. Significantly fewer nulliparas had an episiotomy, and more had a second degree perineal tear, with no evidence of a difference for extensive perineal tears. CONCLUSIONS: Birthing pool use was associated with spontaneous vaginal birth. The increase in second degree tears was balanced by fewer episiotomies. Undue umbilical cord traction should be avoided during waterbirth. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3897991 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38979912014-01-23 Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: prospective observational study Henderson, Jane Burns, Ethel E Regalia, Anna L Casarico, Giovanna Boulton, Mary G Smith, Lesley A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: For women at low risk of childbirth complications, water immersion during labour is a care option in many high income countries. Our aims were (a) to describe maternal characteristics, intrapartum events, interventions, maternal and neonatal outcomes for all women who used a birthing pool during labour who either had a waterbirth or left the pool and had a landbirth, and for the subgroup of women who had a waterbirth in 19 obstetric units, and (b) to compare maternal characteristics, intrapartum events, interventions, and maternal and neonatal outcomes for women who used a birthing pool with a control group of women who did not use a birthing pool for whom we prospectively collected data in a single centre. METHODS: Prospective observational study in 19 Italian obstetric units 2002-2005. Participants were: (a) 2,505 women in labour using a birthing pool in 19 obstetric units; and (b) 114 women in labour using a birthing pool and 459 women who did not use a birthing pool in one obstetric unit. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the sample as a whole and, separately, for those women who gave birth in water. Categorical data were compared using Chi square statistics and continuous data by T-tests. RESULTS: Overall, 95.6% of women using a birthing pool had a spontaneous vertex delivery, 63.9% of which occurred in water. Half of nulliparas and three quarters of multiparas delivered in water. Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were rare. There were two cases of umbilical cord snap with waterbirth. Compared with controls, significantly more women who used a birthing pool adopted an upright birth position, had hands off delivery technique, and a physiological third stage. Significantly fewer nulliparas had an episiotomy, and more had a second degree perineal tear, with no evidence of a difference for extensive perineal tears. CONCLUSIONS: Birthing pool use was associated with spontaneous vaginal birth. The increase in second degree tears was balanced by fewer episiotomies. Undue umbilical cord traction should be avoided during waterbirth. BioMed Central 2014-01-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3897991/ /pubmed/24423216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-17 Text en Copyright © 2014 Henderson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Henderson, Jane Burns, Ethel E Regalia, Anna L Casarico, Giovanna Boulton, Mary G Smith, Lesley A Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: prospective observational study |
title | Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: prospective observational study |
title_full | Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: prospective observational study |
title_fullStr | Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: prospective observational study |
title_full_unstemmed | Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: prospective observational study |
title_short | Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in Italy: prospective observational study |
title_sort | labouring women who used a birthing pool in obsteric units in italy: prospective observational study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3897991/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24423216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-14-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hendersonjane labouringwomenwhousedabirthingpoolinobstericunitsinitalyprospectiveobservationalstudy AT burnsethele labouringwomenwhousedabirthingpoolinobstericunitsinitalyprospectiveobservationalstudy AT regaliaannal labouringwomenwhousedabirthingpoolinobstericunitsinitalyprospectiveobservationalstudy AT casaricogiovanna labouringwomenwhousedabirthingpoolinobstericunitsinitalyprospectiveobservationalstudy AT boultonmaryg labouringwomenwhousedabirthingpoolinobstericunitsinitalyprospectiveobservationalstudy AT smithlesleya labouringwomenwhousedabirthingpoolinobstericunitsinitalyprospectiveobservationalstudy |