Cargando…

Impact of point-of-care CD4 testing on linkage to HIV care: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care testing for CD4 cell count is considered a promising way of reducing the time to eligibility assessment for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and of increasing retention in care prior to treatment initiation. In this review, we assess the available evidence on the patient and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wynberg, Elke, Cooke, Graham, Shroufi, Amir, Reid, Steven D, Ford, Nathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International AIDS Society 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447595
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.18809
_version_ 1782300348870819840
author Wynberg, Elke
Cooke, Graham
Shroufi, Amir
Reid, Steven D
Ford, Nathan
author_facet Wynberg, Elke
Cooke, Graham
Shroufi, Amir
Reid, Steven D
Ford, Nathan
author_sort Wynberg, Elke
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care testing for CD4 cell count is considered a promising way of reducing the time to eligibility assessment for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and of increasing retention in care prior to treatment initiation. In this review, we assess the available evidence on the patient and programme impact of point-of-care CD4 testing. METHODS: We searched nine databases and two conference sites (up until 26 October 2013) for studies reporting patient and programme outcomes following the introduction of point-of-care CD4 testing. Where appropriate, results were pooled using random-effects methods. RESULTS: Fifteen studies, mainly from sub-Saharan Africa, were included for review, providing evidence for adults, adolescents, children and pregnant women. Compared to conventional laboratory-based testing, point-of-care CD4 testing increased the likelihood of having CD4 measured [odds ratio (OR) 4.1, 95% CI 3.5–4.9, n=2] and receiving a CD4 result (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–5.6, n=6). Time to being tested was significantly reduced, by a median of nine days; time from CD4 testing to receiving the result was reduced by as much as 17 days. Evidence for increased treatment initiation was mixed. DISCUSSION: The results of this review suggest that point-of-care CD4 testing can increase retention in care prior to starting treatment and can also reduce time to eligibility assessment, which may result in more eligible patients being initiated on ART.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3898050
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher International AIDS Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38980502014-01-24 Impact of point-of-care CD4 testing on linkage to HIV care: a systematic review Wynberg, Elke Cooke, Graham Shroufi, Amir Reid, Steven D Ford, Nathan J Int AIDS Soc Review Article INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care testing for CD4 cell count is considered a promising way of reducing the time to eligibility assessment for antiretroviral therapy (ART) and of increasing retention in care prior to treatment initiation. In this review, we assess the available evidence on the patient and programme impact of point-of-care CD4 testing. METHODS: We searched nine databases and two conference sites (up until 26 October 2013) for studies reporting patient and programme outcomes following the introduction of point-of-care CD4 testing. Where appropriate, results were pooled using random-effects methods. RESULTS: Fifteen studies, mainly from sub-Saharan Africa, were included for review, providing evidence for adults, adolescents, children and pregnant women. Compared to conventional laboratory-based testing, point-of-care CD4 testing increased the likelihood of having CD4 measured [odds ratio (OR) 4.1, 95% CI 3.5–4.9, n=2] and receiving a CD4 result (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.5–5.6, n=6). Time to being tested was significantly reduced, by a median of nine days; time from CD4 testing to receiving the result was reduced by as much as 17 days. Evidence for increased treatment initiation was mixed. DISCUSSION: The results of this review suggest that point-of-care CD4 testing can increase retention in care prior to starting treatment and can also reduce time to eligibility assessment, which may result in more eligible patients being initiated on ART. International AIDS Society 2014-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3898050/ /pubmed/24447595 http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.18809 Text en © 2014 Wynberg E et al; licensee International AIDS Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wynberg, Elke
Cooke, Graham
Shroufi, Amir
Reid, Steven D
Ford, Nathan
Impact of point-of-care CD4 testing on linkage to HIV care: a systematic review
title Impact of point-of-care CD4 testing on linkage to HIV care: a systematic review
title_full Impact of point-of-care CD4 testing on linkage to HIV care: a systematic review
title_fullStr Impact of point-of-care CD4 testing on linkage to HIV care: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Impact of point-of-care CD4 testing on linkage to HIV care: a systematic review
title_short Impact of point-of-care CD4 testing on linkage to HIV care: a systematic review
title_sort impact of point-of-care cd4 testing on linkage to hiv care: a systematic review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447595
http://dx.doi.org/10.7448/IAS.17.1.18809
work_keys_str_mv AT wynbergelke impactofpointofcarecd4testingonlinkagetohivcareasystematicreview
AT cookegraham impactofpointofcarecd4testingonlinkagetohivcareasystematicreview
AT shroufiamir impactofpointofcarecd4testingonlinkagetohivcareasystematicreview
AT reidstevend impactofpointofcarecd4testingonlinkagetohivcareasystematicreview
AT fordnathan impactofpointofcarecd4testingonlinkagetohivcareasystematicreview