Cargando…

The influence of antigen targeting to sub-cellular compartments on the anti-allergic potential of a DNA vaccine()

BACKGROUND: Gene vaccines offer attractive rationales for prophylactic as well as therapeutic treatments of type I allergies. DNA and mRNA vaccines have been shown to prevent from allergic sensitization and to counterbalance established allergic immune reactions. Recent advances in gene vaccine mani...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weinberger, Esther E., Isakovic, Almedina, Scheiblhofer, Sandra, Ramsauer, Christina, Reiter, Katrin, Hauser-Kronberger, Cornelia, Thalhamer, Josef, Weiss, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Science 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.005
_version_ 1782300395226267648
author Weinberger, Esther E.
Isakovic, Almedina
Scheiblhofer, Sandra
Ramsauer, Christina
Reiter, Katrin
Hauser-Kronberger, Cornelia
Thalhamer, Josef
Weiss, Richard
author_facet Weinberger, Esther E.
Isakovic, Almedina
Scheiblhofer, Sandra
Ramsauer, Christina
Reiter, Katrin
Hauser-Kronberger, Cornelia
Thalhamer, Josef
Weiss, Richard
author_sort Weinberger, Esther E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gene vaccines offer attractive rationales for prophylactic as well as therapeutic treatments of type I allergies. DNA and mRNA vaccines have been shown to prevent from allergic sensitization and to counterbalance established allergic immune reactions. Recent advances in gene vaccine manipulation offer additional opportunities for modulation of T helper cell profiles by specific targeting of cellular compartments. METHODS: DNA vaccines encoding the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1.0101 were equipped with different leader sequences to shuttle the antigen to lysosomes (LIMP-II), to trigger cellular secretion (hTPA), or to induce proteasomal degradation via forced ubiquitination (ubi). Mice were pre-vaccinated with these constructs and the protective efficacy was tested by subcutaneous Th2-promoting challenges, followed by allergen inhalation. IgG antibody subclass distribution and allergen-specific IgE as well as cytokine profiles from re-stimulated splenocytes and from BALFs were assessed. The cellular composition of BALFs, and lung resistance and compliance were determined. RESULTS: Immunization with all targeting variants protected from allergic sensitization, i.e. IgE induction, airway hyperresponsiveness, lung inflammation, and systemic and local Th2 cytokine expression. Surprisingly, protection did not clearly correlate with the induction of a systemic Th1 cytokine profile, but rather with proliferating CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ T regulatory cells in splenocyte cultures. Targeting the allergen to proteasomal or lysosomal degradation severely down-regulated antibody induction after vaccination, while T cell responses remained unaffected. Although secretion of antigen promoted the highest numbers of Th1 cells, this vaccine type was the least efficient in suppressing the establishment of an allergic immune response. CONCLUSION: This comparative analysis highlights the modulatory effect of antigen targeting on the resulting immune response, with a special emphasis on prophylactic anti-allergy DNA vaccination. Targeting the antigen to proteasomal or lysosomal degradation reduces the availability of native allergen, thereby rendering the vaccine hypoallergenic without compromising efficacy, an important feature for a therapeutic setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3898268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Elsevier Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38982682014-01-24 The influence of antigen targeting to sub-cellular compartments on the anti-allergic potential of a DNA vaccine() Weinberger, Esther E. Isakovic, Almedina Scheiblhofer, Sandra Ramsauer, Christina Reiter, Katrin Hauser-Kronberger, Cornelia Thalhamer, Josef Weiss, Richard Vaccine Article BACKGROUND: Gene vaccines offer attractive rationales for prophylactic as well as therapeutic treatments of type I allergies. DNA and mRNA vaccines have been shown to prevent from allergic sensitization and to counterbalance established allergic immune reactions. Recent advances in gene vaccine manipulation offer additional opportunities for modulation of T helper cell profiles by specific targeting of cellular compartments. METHODS: DNA vaccines encoding the major birch pollen allergen Bet v 1.0101 were equipped with different leader sequences to shuttle the antigen to lysosomes (LIMP-II), to trigger cellular secretion (hTPA), or to induce proteasomal degradation via forced ubiquitination (ubi). Mice were pre-vaccinated with these constructs and the protective efficacy was tested by subcutaneous Th2-promoting challenges, followed by allergen inhalation. IgG antibody subclass distribution and allergen-specific IgE as well as cytokine profiles from re-stimulated splenocytes and from BALFs were assessed. The cellular composition of BALFs, and lung resistance and compliance were determined. RESULTS: Immunization with all targeting variants protected from allergic sensitization, i.e. IgE induction, airway hyperresponsiveness, lung inflammation, and systemic and local Th2 cytokine expression. Surprisingly, protection did not clearly correlate with the induction of a systemic Th1 cytokine profile, but rather with proliferating CD4+ CD25+ FoxP3+ T regulatory cells in splenocyte cultures. Targeting the allergen to proteasomal or lysosomal degradation severely down-regulated antibody induction after vaccination, while T cell responses remained unaffected. Although secretion of antigen promoted the highest numbers of Th1 cells, this vaccine type was the least efficient in suppressing the establishment of an allergic immune response. CONCLUSION: This comparative analysis highlights the modulatory effect of antigen targeting on the resulting immune response, with a special emphasis on prophylactic anti-allergy DNA vaccination. Targeting the antigen to proteasomal or lysosomal degradation reduces the availability of native allergen, thereby rendering the vaccine hypoallergenic without compromising efficacy, an important feature for a therapeutic setting. Elsevier Science 2013-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3898268/ /pubmed/23954383 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.005 Text en © 2013 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Weinberger, Esther E.
Isakovic, Almedina
Scheiblhofer, Sandra
Ramsauer, Christina
Reiter, Katrin
Hauser-Kronberger, Cornelia
Thalhamer, Josef
Weiss, Richard
The influence of antigen targeting to sub-cellular compartments on the anti-allergic potential of a DNA vaccine()
title The influence of antigen targeting to sub-cellular compartments on the anti-allergic potential of a DNA vaccine()
title_full The influence of antigen targeting to sub-cellular compartments on the anti-allergic potential of a DNA vaccine()
title_fullStr The influence of antigen targeting to sub-cellular compartments on the anti-allergic potential of a DNA vaccine()
title_full_unstemmed The influence of antigen targeting to sub-cellular compartments on the anti-allergic potential of a DNA vaccine()
title_short The influence of antigen targeting to sub-cellular compartments on the anti-allergic potential of a DNA vaccine()
title_sort influence of antigen targeting to sub-cellular compartments on the anti-allergic potential of a dna vaccine()
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23954383
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.08.005
work_keys_str_mv AT weinbergeresthere theinfluenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT isakovicalmedina theinfluenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT scheiblhofersandra theinfluenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT ramsauerchristina theinfluenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT reiterkatrin theinfluenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT hauserkronbergercornelia theinfluenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT thalhamerjosef theinfluenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT weissrichard theinfluenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT weinbergeresthere influenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT isakovicalmedina influenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT scheiblhofersandra influenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT ramsauerchristina influenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT reiterkatrin influenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT hauserkronbergercornelia influenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT thalhamerjosef influenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine
AT weissrichard influenceofantigentargetingtosubcellularcompartmentsontheantiallergicpotentialofadnavaccine