Cargando…

National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)

BACKGROUND: All medical schools in the UK are required to be able to provide evidence of competence in clinical communication in their graduates. This is usually provided by summative assessment of clinical communication, but there is considerable variation in how this is carried out. This study aim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laidlaw, Anita, Salisbury, Helen, Doherty, Eva M, Wiskin, Connie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24417939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-10
_version_ 1782300428376997888
author Laidlaw, Anita
Salisbury, Helen
Doherty, Eva M
Wiskin, Connie
author_facet Laidlaw, Anita
Salisbury, Helen
Doherty, Eva M
Wiskin, Connie
author_sort Laidlaw, Anita
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: All medical schools in the UK are required to be able to provide evidence of competence in clinical communication in their graduates. This is usually provided by summative assessment of clinical communication, but there is considerable variation in how this is carried out. This study aimed to gain insight into the current assessment of clinical communication in UK medical schools. METHODS: The survey was sent via e-mail to communication leads who then were asked to consult with all staff within their medical school involved in the assessment of communication. RESULTS: Results were obtained from 27 out of 33 schools (response rate 82%) and a total of 34 courses. The average number of assessments per year was 2.4 (minimum 0, maximum 10). The Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) was the most commonly used method of assessment (53%). Other assessments included MCQ and workplace based assessments. Only nine courses used a single method of assessment. Issues raised included, logistics and costs of assessing mainly by OSCE, the robustness and reliability of such exams and integration with other clinical skills. CONCLUSIONS: It is encouraging that a variety of assessment methods are being used within UK medical schools and that these methods target different components of clinical communication skills acquisition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3898466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38984662014-01-23 National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK) Laidlaw, Anita Salisbury, Helen Doherty, Eva M Wiskin, Connie BMC Med Educ Research Article BACKGROUND: All medical schools in the UK are required to be able to provide evidence of competence in clinical communication in their graduates. This is usually provided by summative assessment of clinical communication, but there is considerable variation in how this is carried out. This study aimed to gain insight into the current assessment of clinical communication in UK medical schools. METHODS: The survey was sent via e-mail to communication leads who then were asked to consult with all staff within their medical school involved in the assessment of communication. RESULTS: Results were obtained from 27 out of 33 schools (response rate 82%) and a total of 34 courses. The average number of assessments per year was 2.4 (minimum 0, maximum 10). The Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) was the most commonly used method of assessment (53%). Other assessments included MCQ and workplace based assessments. Only nine courses used a single method of assessment. Issues raised included, logistics and costs of assessing mainly by OSCE, the robustness and reliability of such exams and integration with other clinical skills. CONCLUSIONS: It is encouraging that a variety of assessment methods are being used within UK medical schools and that these methods target different components of clinical communication skills acquisition. BioMed Central 2014-01-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3898466/ /pubmed/24417939 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-10 Text en Copyright © 2014 Laidlaw et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Laidlaw, Anita
Salisbury, Helen
Doherty, Eva M
Wiskin, Connie
National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)
title National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)
title_full National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)
title_fullStr National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)
title_full_unstemmed National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)
title_short National survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the United Kingdom (UK)
title_sort national survey of clinical communication assessment in medical education in the united kingdom (uk)
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24417939
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-10
work_keys_str_mv AT laidlawanita nationalsurveyofclinicalcommunicationassessmentinmedicaleducationintheunitedkingdomuk
AT salisburyhelen nationalsurveyofclinicalcommunicationassessmentinmedicaleducationintheunitedkingdomuk
AT dohertyevam nationalsurveyofclinicalcommunicationassessmentinmedicaleducationintheunitedkingdomuk
AT wiskinconnie nationalsurveyofclinicalcommunicationassessmentinmedicaleducationintheunitedkingdomuk