Cargando…
Psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: Concurrent validity of the brief version of the Management Standards Indicator Tool
The Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT) is a 35-item self-report measure of the psychosocial work environment designed to assist organizations with psychosocial risk assessment. It is also used in work environment research. Edwards and Webster presented a 25-item version of the MSIT based on...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24482553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.843607 |
_version_ | 1782300439150067712 |
---|---|
author | Houdmont, Jonathan Randall, Raymond Kerr, Robert Addley, Ken |
author_facet | Houdmont, Jonathan Randall, Raymond Kerr, Robert Addley, Ken |
author_sort | Houdmont, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT) is a 35-item self-report measure of the psychosocial work environment designed to assist organizations with psychosocial risk assessment. It is also used in work environment research. Edwards and Webster presented a 25-item version of the MSIT based on the deletion of items having a factor loading of < .65. Stress theory and research suggest that psychosocial hazard exposures may result in harm to the health of workers. Thus, using data collected from three UK organizations (N = 20,406) we compared the concurrent validity of the brief and full versions of the MSIT by exploring the strength of association between each version of the instrument and a measure of psychological wellbeing (GHQ-12 and Maslach Burnout Inventory). Analyses revealed that the brief instrument offered similar but not always equal validity to that of the full version. The results indicate that use of the brief instrument, which would be less disruptive for employees, would not elevate the risk of false negative or false positive findings in risk assessment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3898543 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38985432014-01-28 Psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: Concurrent validity of the brief version of the Management Standards Indicator Tool Houdmont, Jonathan Randall, Raymond Kerr, Robert Addley, Ken Work Stress Research Article The Management Standards Indicator Tool (MSIT) is a 35-item self-report measure of the psychosocial work environment designed to assist organizations with psychosocial risk assessment. It is also used in work environment research. Edwards and Webster presented a 25-item version of the MSIT based on the deletion of items having a factor loading of < .65. Stress theory and research suggest that psychosocial hazard exposures may result in harm to the health of workers. Thus, using data collected from three UK organizations (N = 20,406) we compared the concurrent validity of the brief and full versions of the MSIT by exploring the strength of association between each version of the instrument and a measure of psychological wellbeing (GHQ-12 and Maslach Burnout Inventory). Analyses revealed that the brief instrument offered similar but not always equal validity to that of the full version. The results indicate that use of the brief instrument, which would be less disruptive for employees, would not elevate the risk of false negative or false positive findings in risk assessment. Taylor & Francis 2013-10-25 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3898543/ /pubmed/24482553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.843607 Text en © 2013 The Author(s). Published by Routledge. http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf This is an open access article distributed under the Supplemental Terms and Conditions for iOpenAccess articles published in Taylor & Francis journals (http://www.informaworld.com/mpp/uploads/iopenaccess_tcs.pdf) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Houdmont, Jonathan Randall, Raymond Kerr, Robert Addley, Ken Psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: Concurrent validity of the brief version of the Management Standards Indicator Tool |
title | Psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: Concurrent validity of the brief version of the Management Standards Indicator Tool |
title_full | Psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: Concurrent validity of the brief version of the Management Standards Indicator Tool |
title_fullStr | Psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: Concurrent validity of the brief version of the Management Standards Indicator Tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: Concurrent validity of the brief version of the Management Standards Indicator Tool |
title_short | Psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: Concurrent validity of the brief version of the Management Standards Indicator Tool |
title_sort | psychosocial risk assessment in organizations: concurrent validity of the brief version of the management standards indicator tool |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898543/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24482553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.843607 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houdmontjonathan psychosocialriskassessmentinorganizationsconcurrentvalidityofthebriefversionofthemanagementstandardsindicatortool AT randallraymond psychosocialriskassessmentinorganizationsconcurrentvalidityofthebriefversionofthemanagementstandardsindicatortool AT kerrrobert psychosocialriskassessmentinorganizationsconcurrentvalidityofthebriefversionofthemanagementstandardsindicatortool AT addleyken psychosocialriskassessmentinorganizationsconcurrentvalidityofthebriefversionofthemanagementstandardsindicatortool |