Cargando…

Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE: This study uses novel methods to examine the frequency of diagnosis and treatment of prediabetes in real-world clinical settings using electronic health record (EHR) data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of 358,120 adults with incident prediabetes (fasting plasma gluco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmittdiel, Julie A., Adams, Sara R., Segal, Jodi, Griffin, Marie R., Roumie, Christianne L., Ohnsorg, Kris, Grant, Richard W., O’Connor, Patrick J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24271190
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1223
_version_ 1782300467818135552
author Schmittdiel, Julie A.
Adams, Sara R.
Segal, Jodi
Griffin, Marie R.
Roumie, Christianne L.
Ohnsorg, Kris
Grant, Richard W.
O’Connor, Patrick J.
author_facet Schmittdiel, Julie A.
Adams, Sara R.
Segal, Jodi
Griffin, Marie R.
Roumie, Christianne L.
Ohnsorg, Kris
Grant, Richard W.
O’Connor, Patrick J.
author_sort Schmittdiel, Julie A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study uses novel methods to examine the frequency of diagnosis and treatment of prediabetes in real-world clinical settings using electronic health record (EHR) data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of 358,120 adults with incident prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 100–125 mg/dL or glycated hemoglobin 5.7–6.4% [39–46 mmol/mol]) between 2006 and 2010 and examined rates of diagnosis and treatment in the 6 months after identification. RESULTS: In the 6 months after identification of prediabetes, 18% of patients had their blood glucose levels retested; 13% received a physician diagnosis of prediabetes/hyperglycemia; 31.0% had prediabetes, diabetes, or lifestyle documented in the clinical notes; and <0.1% initiated metformin. Among patients with FPG 120–125 mg/dL, 31% were retested; metformin initiation remained <1%. CONCLUSIONS: Documented rates of follow-up and treatment for prediabetes are low. EHR data may be a valuable tool to improve identification and treatment of prediabetes in the U.S.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3898765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38987652015-02-01 Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study Schmittdiel, Julie A. Adams, Sara R. Segal, Jodi Griffin, Marie R. Roumie, Christianne L. Ohnsorg, Kris Grant, Richard W. O’Connor, Patrick J. Diabetes Care Novel Communications in Diabetes OBJECTIVE: This study uses novel methods to examine the frequency of diagnosis and treatment of prediabetes in real-world clinical settings using electronic health record (EHR) data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of 358,120 adults with incident prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 100–125 mg/dL or glycated hemoglobin 5.7–6.4% [39–46 mmol/mol]) between 2006 and 2010 and examined rates of diagnosis and treatment in the 6 months after identification. RESULTS: In the 6 months after identification of prediabetes, 18% of patients had their blood glucose levels retested; 13% received a physician diagnosis of prediabetes/hyperglycemia; 31.0% had prediabetes, diabetes, or lifestyle documented in the clinical notes; and <0.1% initiated metformin. Among patients with FPG 120–125 mg/dL, 31% were retested; metformin initiation remained <1%. CONCLUSIONS: Documented rates of follow-up and treatment for prediabetes are low. EHR data may be a valuable tool to improve identification and treatment of prediabetes in the U.S. American Diabetes Association 2014-02 2014-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3898765/ /pubmed/24271190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1223 Text en © 2014 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Novel Communications in Diabetes
Schmittdiel, Julie A.
Adams, Sara R.
Segal, Jodi
Griffin, Marie R.
Roumie, Christianne L.
Ohnsorg, Kris
Grant, Richard W.
O’Connor, Patrick J.
Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study
title Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study
title_full Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study
title_fullStr Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study
title_short Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study
title_sort novel use and utility of integrated electronic health records to assess rates of prediabetes recognition and treatment: brief report from an integrated electronic health records pilot study
topic Novel Communications in Diabetes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24271190
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1223
work_keys_str_mv AT schmittdieljuliea noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy
AT adamssarar noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy
AT segaljodi noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy
AT griffinmarier noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy
AT roumiechristiannel noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy
AT ohnsorgkris noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy
AT grantrichardw noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy
AT oconnorpatrickj noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy