Cargando…
Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study
OBJECTIVE: This study uses novel methods to examine the frequency of diagnosis and treatment of prediabetes in real-world clinical settings using electronic health record (EHR) data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of 358,120 adults with incident prediabetes (fasting plasma gluco...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Diabetes Association
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24271190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1223 |
_version_ | 1782300467818135552 |
---|---|
author | Schmittdiel, Julie A. Adams, Sara R. Segal, Jodi Griffin, Marie R. Roumie, Christianne L. Ohnsorg, Kris Grant, Richard W. O’Connor, Patrick J. |
author_facet | Schmittdiel, Julie A. Adams, Sara R. Segal, Jodi Griffin, Marie R. Roumie, Christianne L. Ohnsorg, Kris Grant, Richard W. O’Connor, Patrick J. |
author_sort | Schmittdiel, Julie A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study uses novel methods to examine the frequency of diagnosis and treatment of prediabetes in real-world clinical settings using electronic health record (EHR) data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of 358,120 adults with incident prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 100–125 mg/dL or glycated hemoglobin 5.7–6.4% [39–46 mmol/mol]) between 2006 and 2010 and examined rates of diagnosis and treatment in the 6 months after identification. RESULTS: In the 6 months after identification of prediabetes, 18% of patients had their blood glucose levels retested; 13% received a physician diagnosis of prediabetes/hyperglycemia; 31.0% had prediabetes, diabetes, or lifestyle documented in the clinical notes; and <0.1% initiated metformin. Among patients with FPG 120–125 mg/dL, 31% were retested; metformin initiation remained <1%. CONCLUSIONS: Documented rates of follow-up and treatment for prediabetes are low. EHR data may be a valuable tool to improve identification and treatment of prediabetes in the U.S. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3898765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | American Diabetes Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38987652015-02-01 Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study Schmittdiel, Julie A. Adams, Sara R. Segal, Jodi Griffin, Marie R. Roumie, Christianne L. Ohnsorg, Kris Grant, Richard W. O’Connor, Patrick J. Diabetes Care Novel Communications in Diabetes OBJECTIVE: This study uses novel methods to examine the frequency of diagnosis and treatment of prediabetes in real-world clinical settings using electronic health record (EHR) data. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We identified a cohort of 358,120 adults with incident prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose [FPG] 100–125 mg/dL or glycated hemoglobin 5.7–6.4% [39–46 mmol/mol]) between 2006 and 2010 and examined rates of diagnosis and treatment in the 6 months after identification. RESULTS: In the 6 months after identification of prediabetes, 18% of patients had their blood glucose levels retested; 13% received a physician diagnosis of prediabetes/hyperglycemia; 31.0% had prediabetes, diabetes, or lifestyle documented in the clinical notes; and <0.1% initiated metformin. Among patients with FPG 120–125 mg/dL, 31% were retested; metformin initiation remained <1%. CONCLUSIONS: Documented rates of follow-up and treatment for prediabetes are low. EHR data may be a valuable tool to improve identification and treatment of prediabetes in the U.S. American Diabetes Association 2014-02 2014-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3898765/ /pubmed/24271190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1223 Text en © 2014 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details. |
spellingShingle | Novel Communications in Diabetes Schmittdiel, Julie A. Adams, Sara R. Segal, Jodi Griffin, Marie R. Roumie, Christianne L. Ohnsorg, Kris Grant, Richard W. O’Connor, Patrick J. Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study |
title | Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study |
title_full | Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study |
title_short | Novel Use and Utility of Integrated Electronic Health Records to Assess Rates of Prediabetes Recognition and Treatment: Brief Report From an Integrated Electronic Health Records Pilot Study |
title_sort | novel use and utility of integrated electronic health records to assess rates of prediabetes recognition and treatment: brief report from an integrated electronic health records pilot study |
topic | Novel Communications in Diabetes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24271190 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc13-1223 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schmittdieljuliea noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy AT adamssarar noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy AT segaljodi noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy AT griffinmarier noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy AT roumiechristiannel noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy AT ohnsorgkris noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy AT grantrichardw noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy AT oconnorpatrickj noveluseandutilityofintegratedelectronichealthrecordstoassessratesofprediabetesrecognitionandtreatmentbriefreportfromanintegratedelectronichealthrecordspilotstudy |