Cargando…

Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges

BACKGROUND: Urban sprawl has the potential to influence cancer mortality via direct and indirect effects on obesity, access to health services, physical activity, transportation choices and other correlates of sprawl and urbanization. METHODS: This paper presents a cross-sectional analysis of associ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Berrigan, David, Tatalovich, Zaria, Pickle, Linda W, Ewing, Reid, Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24393615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-3
_version_ 1782300470325280768
author Berrigan, David
Tatalovich, Zaria
Pickle, Linda W
Ewing, Reid
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
author_facet Berrigan, David
Tatalovich, Zaria
Pickle, Linda W
Ewing, Reid
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
author_sort Berrigan, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Urban sprawl has the potential to influence cancer mortality via direct and indirect effects on obesity, access to health services, physical activity, transportation choices and other correlates of sprawl and urbanization. METHODS: This paper presents a cross-sectional analysis of associations between urban sprawl and cancer mortality in urban and suburban counties of the United States. This ecological analysis was designed to examine whether urban sprawl is associated with total and obesity-related cancer mortality and to what extent these associations differed in different regions of the US. A major focus of our analyses was to adequately account for spatial heterogeneity in mortality. Therefore, we fit a series of regression models, stratified by gender, successively testing for the presence of spatial heterogeneity. Our resulting models included county level variables related to race, smoking, obesity, access to health services, insurance status, socioeconomic position, and broad geographic region as well as a measure of urban sprawl and several interactions. Our most complex models also included random effects to account for any county-level spatial autocorrelation that remained unexplained by these variables. RESULTS: Total cancer mortality rates were higher in less sprawling areas and contrary to our initial hypothesis; this was also true of obesity related cancers in six of seven U.S. regions (census divisions) where there were statistically significant associations between the sprawl index and mortality. We also found significant interactions (p < 0.05) between region and urban sprawl for total and obesity related cancer mortality in both sexes. Thus, the association between urban sprawl and cancer mortality differs in different regions of the US. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher levels of obesity in more sprawling counties in the US, mortality from obesity related cancer was not greater in such counties. Identification of disparities in cancer mortality within and between geographic regions is an ongoing public health challenge and an opportunity for further analytical work identifying potential causes of these disparities. Future analyses of urban sprawl and health outcomes should consider exploring regional and international variation in associations between sprawl and health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3898779
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38987792014-01-23 Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges Berrigan, David Tatalovich, Zaria Pickle, Linda W Ewing, Reid Ballard-Barbash, Rachel Int J Health Geogr Research BACKGROUND: Urban sprawl has the potential to influence cancer mortality via direct and indirect effects on obesity, access to health services, physical activity, transportation choices and other correlates of sprawl and urbanization. METHODS: This paper presents a cross-sectional analysis of associations between urban sprawl and cancer mortality in urban and suburban counties of the United States. This ecological analysis was designed to examine whether urban sprawl is associated with total and obesity-related cancer mortality and to what extent these associations differed in different regions of the US. A major focus of our analyses was to adequately account for spatial heterogeneity in mortality. Therefore, we fit a series of regression models, stratified by gender, successively testing for the presence of spatial heterogeneity. Our resulting models included county level variables related to race, smoking, obesity, access to health services, insurance status, socioeconomic position, and broad geographic region as well as a measure of urban sprawl and several interactions. Our most complex models also included random effects to account for any county-level spatial autocorrelation that remained unexplained by these variables. RESULTS: Total cancer mortality rates were higher in less sprawling areas and contrary to our initial hypothesis; this was also true of obesity related cancers in six of seven U.S. regions (census divisions) where there were statistically significant associations between the sprawl index and mortality. We also found significant interactions (p < 0.05) between region and urban sprawl for total and obesity related cancer mortality in both sexes. Thus, the association between urban sprawl and cancer mortality differs in different regions of the US. CONCLUSIONS: Despite higher levels of obesity in more sprawling counties in the US, mortality from obesity related cancer was not greater in such counties. Identification of disparities in cancer mortality within and between geographic regions is an ongoing public health challenge and an opportunity for further analytical work identifying potential causes of these disparities. Future analyses of urban sprawl and health outcomes should consider exploring regional and international variation in associations between sprawl and health. BioMed Central 2014-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3898779/ /pubmed/24393615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-3 Text en Copyright © 2014 Berrigan et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Berrigan, David
Tatalovich, Zaria
Pickle, Linda W
Ewing, Reid
Ballard-Barbash, Rachel
Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges
title Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges
title_full Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges
title_fullStr Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges
title_full_unstemmed Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges
title_short Urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the United States: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges
title_sort urban sprawl, obesity, and cancer mortality in the united states: cross-sectional analysis and methodological challenges
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898779/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24393615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-072X-13-3
work_keys_str_mv AT berrigandavid urbansprawlobesityandcancermortalityintheunitedstatescrosssectionalanalysisandmethodologicalchallenges
AT tatalovichzaria urbansprawlobesityandcancermortalityintheunitedstatescrosssectionalanalysisandmethodologicalchallenges
AT picklelindaw urbansprawlobesityandcancermortalityintheunitedstatescrosssectionalanalysisandmethodologicalchallenges
AT ewingreid urbansprawlobesityandcancermortalityintheunitedstatescrosssectionalanalysisandmethodologicalchallenges
AT ballardbarbashrachel urbansprawlobesityandcancermortalityintheunitedstatescrosssectionalanalysisandmethodologicalchallenges