Cargando…
Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics
BACKGROUND: Good prosthetic suspension system secures the residual limb inside the prosthetic socket and enables easy donning and doffing. This study aimed to introduce, evaluate and compare a newly designed prosthetic suspension system (HOLO) with the current suspension systems (suction, pin/lock a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-1 |
_version_ | 1782300472125685760 |
---|---|
author | Gholizadeh, Hossein Abu Osman, Noor Azuan Eshraghi, Arezoo Ali, Sadeeq Arifin, Nooranida Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar |
author_facet | Gholizadeh, Hossein Abu Osman, Noor Azuan Eshraghi, Arezoo Ali, Sadeeq Arifin, Nooranida Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar |
author_sort | Gholizadeh, Hossein |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Good prosthetic suspension system secures the residual limb inside the prosthetic socket and enables easy donning and doffing. This study aimed to introduce, evaluate and compare a newly designed prosthetic suspension system (HOLO) with the current suspension systems (suction, pin/lock and magnetic systems). METHODS: All the suspension systems were tested (tensile testing machine) in terms of the degree of the shear strength and the patient’s comfort. Nine transtibial amputees participated in this study. The patients were asked to use four different suspension systems. Afterwards, each participant completed a questionnaire for each system to evaluate their comfort. Furthermore, the systems were compared in terms of the cost. RESULTS: The maximum tensile load that the new system could bear was 490 N (SD, 5.5) before the system failed. Pin/lock, magnetic and suction suspension systems could tolerate loads of580 N (SD, 8.5), 350.9 (SD, 7) and 310 N (SD, 8.4), respectively. Our subjects were satisfied with the new hook and loop system, particularly in terms of easy donning and doffing. Furthermore, the new system is considerably cheaper (35 times) than the current locking systems in the market. CONCLUSIONS: The new suspension system could successfully retain the prosthesis on the residual limb as a good alternative for lower limb amputees. In addition, the new system addresses some problems of the existing systems and is more cost effective than its counterparts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3898787 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38987872014-01-23 Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics Gholizadeh, Hossein Abu Osman, Noor Azuan Eshraghi, Arezoo Ali, Sadeeq Arifin, Nooranida Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Good prosthetic suspension system secures the residual limb inside the prosthetic socket and enables easy donning and doffing. This study aimed to introduce, evaluate and compare a newly designed prosthetic suspension system (HOLO) with the current suspension systems (suction, pin/lock and magnetic systems). METHODS: All the suspension systems were tested (tensile testing machine) in terms of the degree of the shear strength and the patient’s comfort. Nine transtibial amputees participated in this study. The patients were asked to use four different suspension systems. Afterwards, each participant completed a questionnaire for each system to evaluate their comfort. Furthermore, the systems were compared in terms of the cost. RESULTS: The maximum tensile load that the new system could bear was 490 N (SD, 5.5) before the system failed. Pin/lock, magnetic and suction suspension systems could tolerate loads of580 N (SD, 8.5), 350.9 (SD, 7) and 310 N (SD, 8.4), respectively. Our subjects were satisfied with the new hook and loop system, particularly in terms of easy donning and doffing. Furthermore, the new system is considerably cheaper (35 times) than the current locking systems in the market. CONCLUSIONS: The new suspension system could successfully retain the prosthesis on the residual limb as a good alternative for lower limb amputees. In addition, the new system addresses some problems of the existing systems and is more cost effective than its counterparts. BioMed Central 2014-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3898787/ /pubmed/24410918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-1 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gholizadeh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Gholizadeh, Hossein Abu Osman, Noor Azuan Eshraghi, Arezoo Ali, Sadeeq Arifin, Nooranida Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics |
title | Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics |
title_full | Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics |
title_short | Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics |
title_sort | evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898787/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gholizadehhossein evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics AT abuosmannoorazuan evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics AT eshraghiarezoo evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics AT alisadeeq evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics AT arifinnooranida evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics AT wanabaswanabubakar evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics |