Cargando…

Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics

BACKGROUND: Good prosthetic suspension system secures the residual limb inside the prosthetic socket and enables easy donning and doffing. This study aimed to introduce, evaluate and compare a newly designed prosthetic suspension system (HOLO) with the current suspension systems (suction, pin/lock a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gholizadeh, Hossein, Abu Osman, Noor Azuan, Eshraghi, Arezoo, Ali, Sadeeq, Arifin, Nooranida, Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-1
_version_ 1782300472125685760
author Gholizadeh, Hossein
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
Eshraghi, Arezoo
Ali, Sadeeq
Arifin, Nooranida
Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar
author_facet Gholizadeh, Hossein
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
Eshraghi, Arezoo
Ali, Sadeeq
Arifin, Nooranida
Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar
author_sort Gholizadeh, Hossein
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Good prosthetic suspension system secures the residual limb inside the prosthetic socket and enables easy donning and doffing. This study aimed to introduce, evaluate and compare a newly designed prosthetic suspension system (HOLO) with the current suspension systems (suction, pin/lock and magnetic systems). METHODS: All the suspension systems were tested (tensile testing machine) in terms of the degree of the shear strength and the patient’s comfort. Nine transtibial amputees participated in this study. The patients were asked to use four different suspension systems. Afterwards, each participant completed a questionnaire for each system to evaluate their comfort. Furthermore, the systems were compared in terms of the cost. RESULTS: The maximum tensile load that the new system could bear was 490 N (SD, 5.5) before the system failed. Pin/lock, magnetic and suction suspension systems could tolerate loads of580 N (SD, 8.5), 350.9 (SD, 7) and 310 N (SD, 8.4), respectively. Our subjects were satisfied with the new hook and loop system, particularly in terms of easy donning and doffing. Furthermore, the new system is considerably cheaper (35 times) than the current locking systems in the market. CONCLUSIONS: The new suspension system could successfully retain the prosthesis on the residual limb as a good alternative for lower limb amputees. In addition, the new system addresses some problems of the existing systems and is more cost effective than its counterparts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3898787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38987872014-01-23 Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics Gholizadeh, Hossein Abu Osman, Noor Azuan Eshraghi, Arezoo Ali, Sadeeq Arifin, Nooranida Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Good prosthetic suspension system secures the residual limb inside the prosthetic socket and enables easy donning and doffing. This study aimed to introduce, evaluate and compare a newly designed prosthetic suspension system (HOLO) with the current suspension systems (suction, pin/lock and magnetic systems). METHODS: All the suspension systems were tested (tensile testing machine) in terms of the degree of the shear strength and the patient’s comfort. Nine transtibial amputees participated in this study. The patients were asked to use four different suspension systems. Afterwards, each participant completed a questionnaire for each system to evaluate their comfort. Furthermore, the systems were compared in terms of the cost. RESULTS: The maximum tensile load that the new system could bear was 490 N (SD, 5.5) before the system failed. Pin/lock, magnetic and suction suspension systems could tolerate loads of580 N (SD, 8.5), 350.9 (SD, 7) and 310 N (SD, 8.4), respectively. Our subjects were satisfied with the new hook and loop system, particularly in terms of easy donning and doffing. Furthermore, the new system is considerably cheaper (35 times) than the current locking systems in the market. CONCLUSIONS: The new suspension system could successfully retain the prosthesis on the residual limb as a good alternative for lower limb amputees. In addition, the new system addresses some problems of the existing systems and is more cost effective than its counterparts. BioMed Central 2014-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3898787/ /pubmed/24410918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-1 Text en Copyright © 2014 Gholizadeh et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gholizadeh, Hossein
Abu Osman, Noor Azuan
Eshraghi, Arezoo
Ali, Sadeeq
Arifin, Nooranida
Wan Abas, Wan Abu Bakar
Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics
title Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics
title_full Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics
title_fullStr Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics
title_short Evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics
title_sort evaluation of new suspension system for limb prosthetics
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24410918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-13-1
work_keys_str_mv AT gholizadehhossein evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics
AT abuosmannoorazuan evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics
AT eshraghiarezoo evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics
AT alisadeeq evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics
AT arifinnooranida evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics
AT wanabaswanabubakar evaluationofnewsuspensionsystemforlimbprosthetics