Cargando…
Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE)
BACKGROUND: The psychometric properties of an online test are not necessarily identical to its paper and pencil original. The aim of this study is to test whether the factor structure of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is measurement invariant with respect to online vs. paper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084011 |
_version_ | 1782300494080770048 |
---|---|
author | Vleeschouwer, Marloes Schubart, Chris D. Henquet, Cecile Myin-Germeys, Inez van Gastel, Willemijn A. Hillegers, Manon H. J. van Os, Jim J. Boks, Marco P. M. Derks, Eske M. |
author_facet | Vleeschouwer, Marloes Schubart, Chris D. Henquet, Cecile Myin-Germeys, Inez van Gastel, Willemijn A. Hillegers, Manon H. J. van Os, Jim J. Boks, Marco P. M. Derks, Eske M. |
author_sort | Vleeschouwer, Marloes |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The psychometric properties of an online test are not necessarily identical to its paper and pencil original. The aim of this study is to test whether the factor structure of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is measurement invariant with respect to online vs. paper and pencil assessment. METHOD: The factor structure of CAPE items assessed by paper and pencil (N = 796) was compared with the factor structure of CAPE items assessed by the Internet (N = 21,590) using formal tests for Measurement Invariance (MI). The effect size was calculated by estimating the Signed Item Difference in the Sample (SIDS) index and the Signed Test Difference in the Sample (STDS) for a hypothetical subject who scores 2 standard deviations above average on the latent dimensions. RESULTS: The more restricted Metric Invariance model showed a significantly worse fit compared to the less restricted Configural Invariance model (χ(2)(23) = 152.75, p<0.001). However, the SIDS indices appear to be small, with an average of −0.11. A STDS of −4.80 indicates that Internet sample members who score 2 standard deviations above average would be expected to score 4.80 points lower on the CAPE total scale (ranging from 42 to 114 points) than would members of the Paper sample with the same latent trait score. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings did not support measurement invariance with respect to assessment method. Because of the small effect sizes, the measurement differences between the online assessed CAPE and its paper and pencil original can be neglected without major consequences for research purposes. However, a person with a high vulnerability for psychotic symptoms would score 4.80 points lower on the total scale if the CAPE is assessed online compared to paper and pencil assessment. Therefore, for clinical purposes, one should be cautious with online assessment of the CAPE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3898946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38989462014-01-24 Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) Vleeschouwer, Marloes Schubart, Chris D. Henquet, Cecile Myin-Germeys, Inez van Gastel, Willemijn A. Hillegers, Manon H. J. van Os, Jim J. Boks, Marco P. M. Derks, Eske M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The psychometric properties of an online test are not necessarily identical to its paper and pencil original. The aim of this study is to test whether the factor structure of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is measurement invariant with respect to online vs. paper and pencil assessment. METHOD: The factor structure of CAPE items assessed by paper and pencil (N = 796) was compared with the factor structure of CAPE items assessed by the Internet (N = 21,590) using formal tests for Measurement Invariance (MI). The effect size was calculated by estimating the Signed Item Difference in the Sample (SIDS) index and the Signed Test Difference in the Sample (STDS) for a hypothetical subject who scores 2 standard deviations above average on the latent dimensions. RESULTS: The more restricted Metric Invariance model showed a significantly worse fit compared to the less restricted Configural Invariance model (χ(2)(23) = 152.75, p<0.001). However, the SIDS indices appear to be small, with an average of −0.11. A STDS of −4.80 indicates that Internet sample members who score 2 standard deviations above average would be expected to score 4.80 points lower on the CAPE total scale (ranging from 42 to 114 points) than would members of the Paper sample with the same latent trait score. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings did not support measurement invariance with respect to assessment method. Because of the small effect sizes, the measurement differences between the online assessed CAPE and its paper and pencil original can be neglected without major consequences for research purposes. However, a person with a high vulnerability for psychotic symptoms would score 4.80 points lower on the total scale if the CAPE is assessed online compared to paper and pencil assessment. Therefore, for clinical purposes, one should be cautious with online assessment of the CAPE. Public Library of Science 2014-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3898946/ /pubmed/24465389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084011 Text en © 2014 Vleeschouwer et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Vleeschouwer, Marloes Schubart, Chris D. Henquet, Cecile Myin-Germeys, Inez van Gastel, Willemijn A. Hillegers, Manon H. J. van Os, Jim J. Boks, Marco P. M. Derks, Eske M. Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) |
title | Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) |
title_full | Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) |
title_fullStr | Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) |
title_short | Does Assessment Type Matter? A Measurement Invariance Analysis of Online and Paper and Pencil Assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) |
title_sort | does assessment type matter? a measurement invariance analysis of online and paper and pencil assessment of the community assessment of psychic experiences (cape) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465389 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vleeschouwermarloes doesassessmenttypematterameasurementinvarianceanalysisofonlineandpaperandpencilassessmentofthecommunityassessmentofpsychicexperiencescape AT schubartchrisd doesassessmenttypematterameasurementinvarianceanalysisofonlineandpaperandpencilassessmentofthecommunityassessmentofpsychicexperiencescape AT henquetcecile doesassessmenttypematterameasurementinvarianceanalysisofonlineandpaperandpencilassessmentofthecommunityassessmentofpsychicexperiencescape AT myingermeysinez doesassessmenttypematterameasurementinvarianceanalysisofonlineandpaperandpencilassessmentofthecommunityassessmentofpsychicexperiencescape AT vangastelwillemijna doesassessmenttypematterameasurementinvarianceanalysisofonlineandpaperandpencilassessmentofthecommunityassessmentofpsychicexperiencescape AT hillegersmanonhj doesassessmenttypematterameasurementinvarianceanalysisofonlineandpaperandpencilassessmentofthecommunityassessmentofpsychicexperiencescape AT vanosjimj doesassessmenttypematterameasurementinvarianceanalysisofonlineandpaperandpencilassessmentofthecommunityassessmentofpsychicexperiencescape AT boksmarcopm doesassessmenttypematterameasurementinvarianceanalysisofonlineandpaperandpencilassessmentofthecommunityassessmentofpsychicexperiencescape AT derkseskem doesassessmenttypematterameasurementinvarianceanalysisofonlineandpaperandpencilassessmentofthecommunityassessmentofpsychicexperiencescape |