Cargando…
Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study
OBJECTIVE: Noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and has been associated with biased cortisol estimates in nonpregnant subjects. This study is the first to investigate in pregnant women strategies to improve ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance, and the association betwe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086204 |
_version_ | 1782300528628203520 |
---|---|
author | Moeller, Julian Lieb, Roselind Meyer, Andrea H. Loetscher, Katharina Quack Krastel, Bettina Meinlschmidt, Gunther |
author_facet | Moeller, Julian Lieb, Roselind Meyer, Andrea H. Loetscher, Katharina Quack Krastel, Bettina Meinlschmidt, Gunther |
author_sort | Moeller, Julian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and has been associated with biased cortisol estimates in nonpregnant subjects. This study is the first to investigate in pregnant women strategies to improve ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance, and the association between sampling noncompliance and saliva cortisol estimates. METHODS: We instructed 64 pregnant women to collect eight scheduled saliva samples on two consecutive days each. Objective compliance with scheduled sampling times was assessed with a Medication Event Monitoring System and self-reported compliance with a paper-and-pencil diary. In a randomized controlled study, we estimated whether a disclosure intervention (informing women about objective compliance monitoring) and a reminder intervention (use of acoustical reminders) improved compliance. A mixed model analysis was used to estimate associations between women's objective compliance and their diurnal cortisol profiles, and between deviation from scheduled sampling and the cortisol concentration measured in the related sample. RESULTS: Self-reported compliance with a saliva-sampling protocol was 91%, and objective compliance was 70%. The disclosure intervention was associated with improved objective compliance (informed: 81%, noninformed: 60%), F(1,60) = 17.64, p<0.001, but not the reminder intervention (reminders: 68%, without reminders: 72%), F(1,60) = 0.78, p = 0.379. Furthermore, a woman's increased objective compliance was associated with a higher diurnal cortisol profile, F(2,64) = 8.22, p<0.001. Altered cortisol levels were observed in less objective compliant samples, F(1,705) = 7.38, p = 0.007, with delayed sampling associated with lower cortisol levels. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that in pregnant women, objective noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and is associated with biased cortisol estimates. To improve sampling compliance, results suggest informing women about objective compliance monitoring but discourage use of acoustical reminders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3899170 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38991702014-01-24 Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study Moeller, Julian Lieb, Roselind Meyer, Andrea H. Loetscher, Katharina Quack Krastel, Bettina Meinlschmidt, Gunther PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and has been associated with biased cortisol estimates in nonpregnant subjects. This study is the first to investigate in pregnant women strategies to improve ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance, and the association between sampling noncompliance and saliva cortisol estimates. METHODS: We instructed 64 pregnant women to collect eight scheduled saliva samples on two consecutive days each. Objective compliance with scheduled sampling times was assessed with a Medication Event Monitoring System and self-reported compliance with a paper-and-pencil diary. In a randomized controlled study, we estimated whether a disclosure intervention (informing women about objective compliance monitoring) and a reminder intervention (use of acoustical reminders) improved compliance. A mixed model analysis was used to estimate associations between women's objective compliance and their diurnal cortisol profiles, and between deviation from scheduled sampling and the cortisol concentration measured in the related sample. RESULTS: Self-reported compliance with a saliva-sampling protocol was 91%, and objective compliance was 70%. The disclosure intervention was associated with improved objective compliance (informed: 81%, noninformed: 60%), F(1,60) = 17.64, p<0.001, but not the reminder intervention (reminders: 68%, without reminders: 72%), F(1,60) = 0.78, p = 0.379. Furthermore, a woman's increased objective compliance was associated with a higher diurnal cortisol profile, F(2,64) = 8.22, p<0.001. Altered cortisol levels were observed in less objective compliant samples, F(1,705) = 7.38, p = 0.007, with delayed sampling associated with lower cortisol levels. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that in pregnant women, objective noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and is associated with biased cortisol estimates. To improve sampling compliance, results suggest informing women about objective compliance monitoring but discourage use of acoustical reminders. Public Library of Science 2014-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3899170/ /pubmed/24465958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086204 Text en © 2014 Moeller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moeller, Julian Lieb, Roselind Meyer, Andrea H. Loetscher, Katharina Quack Krastel, Bettina Meinlschmidt, Gunther Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title | Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full | Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_fullStr | Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_short | Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study |
title_sort | improving ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance in pregnant women: a randomized controlled study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899170/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086204 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moellerjulian improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT liebroselind improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT meyerandreah improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT loetscherkatharinaquack improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT krastelbettina improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT meinlschmidtgunther improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy |