Cargando…

Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE: Noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and has been associated with biased cortisol estimates in nonpregnant subjects. This study is the first to investigate in pregnant women strategies to improve ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance, and the association betwe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moeller, Julian, Lieb, Roselind, Meyer, Andrea H., Loetscher, Katharina Quack, Krastel, Bettina, Meinlschmidt, Gunther
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086204
_version_ 1782300528628203520
author Moeller, Julian
Lieb, Roselind
Meyer, Andrea H.
Loetscher, Katharina Quack
Krastel, Bettina
Meinlschmidt, Gunther
author_facet Moeller, Julian
Lieb, Roselind
Meyer, Andrea H.
Loetscher, Katharina Quack
Krastel, Bettina
Meinlschmidt, Gunther
author_sort Moeller, Julian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and has been associated with biased cortisol estimates in nonpregnant subjects. This study is the first to investigate in pregnant women strategies to improve ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance, and the association between sampling noncompliance and saliva cortisol estimates. METHODS: We instructed 64 pregnant women to collect eight scheduled saliva samples on two consecutive days each. Objective compliance with scheduled sampling times was assessed with a Medication Event Monitoring System and self-reported compliance with a paper-and-pencil diary. In a randomized controlled study, we estimated whether a disclosure intervention (informing women about objective compliance monitoring) and a reminder intervention (use of acoustical reminders) improved compliance. A mixed model analysis was used to estimate associations between women's objective compliance and their diurnal cortisol profiles, and between deviation from scheduled sampling and the cortisol concentration measured in the related sample. RESULTS: Self-reported compliance with a saliva-sampling protocol was 91%, and objective compliance was 70%. The disclosure intervention was associated with improved objective compliance (informed: 81%, noninformed: 60%), F(1,60)  = 17.64, p<0.001, but not the reminder intervention (reminders: 68%, without reminders: 72%), F(1,60)  = 0.78, p = 0.379. Furthermore, a woman's increased objective compliance was associated with a higher diurnal cortisol profile, F(2,64) = 8.22, p<0.001. Altered cortisol levels were observed in less objective compliant samples, F(1,705) = 7.38, p = 0.007, with delayed sampling associated with lower cortisol levels. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that in pregnant women, objective noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and is associated with biased cortisol estimates. To improve sampling compliance, results suggest informing women about objective compliance monitoring but discourage use of acoustical reminders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3899170
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38991702014-01-24 Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study Moeller, Julian Lieb, Roselind Meyer, Andrea H. Loetscher, Katharina Quack Krastel, Bettina Meinlschmidt, Gunther PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and has been associated with biased cortisol estimates in nonpregnant subjects. This study is the first to investigate in pregnant women strategies to improve ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance, and the association between sampling noncompliance and saliva cortisol estimates. METHODS: We instructed 64 pregnant women to collect eight scheduled saliva samples on two consecutive days each. Objective compliance with scheduled sampling times was assessed with a Medication Event Monitoring System and self-reported compliance with a paper-and-pencil diary. In a randomized controlled study, we estimated whether a disclosure intervention (informing women about objective compliance monitoring) and a reminder intervention (use of acoustical reminders) improved compliance. A mixed model analysis was used to estimate associations between women's objective compliance and their diurnal cortisol profiles, and between deviation from scheduled sampling and the cortisol concentration measured in the related sample. RESULTS: Self-reported compliance with a saliva-sampling protocol was 91%, and objective compliance was 70%. The disclosure intervention was associated with improved objective compliance (informed: 81%, noninformed: 60%), F(1,60)  = 17.64, p<0.001, but not the reminder intervention (reminders: 68%, without reminders: 72%), F(1,60)  = 0.78, p = 0.379. Furthermore, a woman's increased objective compliance was associated with a higher diurnal cortisol profile, F(2,64) = 8.22, p<0.001. Altered cortisol levels were observed in less objective compliant samples, F(1,705) = 7.38, p = 0.007, with delayed sampling associated with lower cortisol levels. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that in pregnant women, objective noncompliance with scheduled ambulatory saliva sampling is common and is associated with biased cortisol estimates. To improve sampling compliance, results suggest informing women about objective compliance monitoring but discourage use of acoustical reminders. Public Library of Science 2014-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3899170/ /pubmed/24465958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086204 Text en © 2014 Moeller et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moeller, Julian
Lieb, Roselind
Meyer, Andrea H.
Loetscher, Katharina Quack
Krastel, Bettina
Meinlschmidt, Gunther
Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study
title Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_fullStr Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_short Improving Ambulatory Saliva-Sampling Compliance in Pregnant Women: A Randomized Controlled Study
title_sort improving ambulatory saliva-sampling compliance in pregnant women: a randomized controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899170/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24465958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086204
work_keys_str_mv AT moellerjulian improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT liebroselind improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT meyerandreah improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT loetscherkatharinaquack improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT krastelbettina improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy
AT meinlschmidtgunther improvingambulatorysalivasamplingcomplianceinpregnantwomenarandomizedcontrolledstudy