Cargando…

Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China

Based on the isometric hypothesis, belowground plant biomass (M(B)) should scale isometrically with aboveground biomass (M(A)) and the scaling exponent should not vary with environmental factors. We tested this hypothesis using a large forest biomass database collected in China. Allometric scaling f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hui, Dafeng, Wang, Jun, Shen, Weijun, Le, Xuan, Ganter, Philip, Ren, Hai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24466149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086550
_version_ 1782300546938437632
author Hui, Dafeng
Wang, Jun
Shen, Weijun
Le, Xuan
Ganter, Philip
Ren, Hai
author_facet Hui, Dafeng
Wang, Jun
Shen, Weijun
Le, Xuan
Ganter, Philip
Ren, Hai
author_sort Hui, Dafeng
collection PubMed
description Based on the isometric hypothesis, belowground plant biomass (M(B)) should scale isometrically with aboveground biomass (M(A)) and the scaling exponent should not vary with environmental factors. We tested this hypothesis using a large forest biomass database collected in China. Allometric scaling functions relating M(B) and M(A) were developed for the entire database and for different groups based on tree age, diameter at breast height, height, latitude, longitude or elevation. To investigate whether the scaling exponent is independent of these biotic and abiotic factors, we analyzed the relationship between the scaling exponent and these factors. Overall M(B) was significantly related to M(A) with a scaling exponent of 0.964. The scaling exponent of the allometric function did not vary with tree age, density, latitude, or longitude, but varied with diameter at breast height, height, and elevation. The mean of the scaling exponent over all groups was 0.986. Among 57 scaling relationships developed, 26 of the scaling exponents were not significantly different from 1. Our results generally support the isometric hypothesis. M(B) scaled near isometrically with M(A) and the scaling exponent did not vary with tree age, density, latitude, or longitude, but increased with tree size and elevation. While fitting a single allometric scaling relationship may be adequate, the estimation of M(B) from M(A) could be improved with size-specific scaling relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3899269
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38992692014-01-24 Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China Hui, Dafeng Wang, Jun Shen, Weijun Le, Xuan Ganter, Philip Ren, Hai PLoS One Research Article Based on the isometric hypothesis, belowground plant biomass (M(B)) should scale isometrically with aboveground biomass (M(A)) and the scaling exponent should not vary with environmental factors. We tested this hypothesis using a large forest biomass database collected in China. Allometric scaling functions relating M(B) and M(A) were developed for the entire database and for different groups based on tree age, diameter at breast height, height, latitude, longitude or elevation. To investigate whether the scaling exponent is independent of these biotic and abiotic factors, we analyzed the relationship between the scaling exponent and these factors. Overall M(B) was significantly related to M(A) with a scaling exponent of 0.964. The scaling exponent of the allometric function did not vary with tree age, density, latitude, or longitude, but varied with diameter at breast height, height, and elevation. The mean of the scaling exponent over all groups was 0.986. Among 57 scaling relationships developed, 26 of the scaling exponents were not significantly different from 1. Our results generally support the isometric hypothesis. M(B) scaled near isometrically with M(A) and the scaling exponent did not vary with tree age, density, latitude, or longitude, but increased with tree size and elevation. While fitting a single allometric scaling relationship may be adequate, the estimation of M(B) from M(A) could be improved with size-specific scaling relationships. Public Library of Science 2014-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3899269/ /pubmed/24466149 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086550 Text en © 2014 Hui et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hui, Dafeng
Wang, Jun
Shen, Weijun
Le, Xuan
Ganter, Philip
Ren, Hai
Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China
title Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China
title_full Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China
title_fullStr Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China
title_full_unstemmed Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China
title_short Near Isometric Biomass Partitioning in Forest Ecosystems of China
title_sort near isometric biomass partitioning in forest ecosystems of china
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24466149
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086550
work_keys_str_mv AT huidafeng nearisometricbiomasspartitioninginforestecosystemsofchina
AT wangjun nearisometricbiomasspartitioninginforestecosystemsofchina
AT shenweijun nearisometricbiomasspartitioninginforestecosystemsofchina
AT lexuan nearisometricbiomasspartitioninginforestecosystemsofchina
AT ganterphilip nearisometricbiomasspartitioninginforestecosystemsofchina
AT renhai nearisometricbiomasspartitioninginforestecosystemsofchina