Cargando…
Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: X-ray mammography remains the predominant test for screening for breast cancer, with the aim of reducing breast cancer mortality. In the English NHS Breast Screening Programme each woman’s mammograms are examined separately by two expert readers. The two readers read each batch in the sa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24411004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-17 |
_version_ | 1782300599824416768 |
---|---|
author | Taylor-Phillips, Sian Wallis, Matthew G Parsons, Helen Dunn, Janet Stallard, Nigel Campbell, Helen Sellars, Sarah Szczepura, Ala Gates, Simon Clarke, Aileen |
author_facet | Taylor-Phillips, Sian Wallis, Matthew G Parsons, Helen Dunn, Janet Stallard, Nigel Campbell, Helen Sellars, Sarah Szczepura, Ala Gates, Simon Clarke, Aileen |
author_sort | Taylor-Phillips, Sian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: X-ray mammography remains the predominant test for screening for breast cancer, with the aim of reducing breast cancer mortality. In the English NHS Breast Screening Programme each woman’s mammograms are examined separately by two expert readers. The two readers read each batch in the same order and each indicates if there should be recall for further tests. This is a highly skilled, pressurised, repetitive and frequently intellectually unchallenging activity where readers examine one or more batches of 30–50 women’s mammograms in each session. A vigilance decrement or performance decrease over time has been observed in similar repetitive visual tasks such as radar operation. METHODS/DESIGN: The CO-OPS study is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm, double blind cluster randomised controlled trial of a computer software intervention designed to reduce the effects of a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening. The unit of randomisation is the batch. Intervention batches will be examined in the opposite order by the two readers (one forwards, one backwards). Control batches will be read in the same order as one another, as is current standard practice. The hypothesis is that cancer detection rates will be higher in the intervention group because each readers’ peak performance will occur when examining different women’s mammograms. The trial will take place in 44 English breast screening centres for 1 year and 4 months. The primary outcome is cancer detection rate, which will be extracted from computer records after 1 year of the trial. The secondary outcomes include rate of disagreement between readers (a more statistically powerful surrogate for cancer detection rate), recall rate, positive predictive value, and interval cancer rate (cancers found between screening rounds which will be measured three years after the end of the trial). DISCUSSION: This is the first trial of an intervention to ameliorate a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN46603370 (submitted: 24 October 2012, date of registration: 26 March 2013). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3899604 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38996042014-01-24 Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Taylor-Phillips, Sian Wallis, Matthew G Parsons, Helen Dunn, Janet Stallard, Nigel Campbell, Helen Sellars, Sarah Szczepura, Ala Gates, Simon Clarke, Aileen Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: X-ray mammography remains the predominant test for screening for breast cancer, with the aim of reducing breast cancer mortality. In the English NHS Breast Screening Programme each woman’s mammograms are examined separately by two expert readers. The two readers read each batch in the same order and each indicates if there should be recall for further tests. This is a highly skilled, pressurised, repetitive and frequently intellectually unchallenging activity where readers examine one or more batches of 30–50 women’s mammograms in each session. A vigilance decrement or performance decrease over time has been observed in similar repetitive visual tasks such as radar operation. METHODS/DESIGN: The CO-OPS study is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm, double blind cluster randomised controlled trial of a computer software intervention designed to reduce the effects of a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening. The unit of randomisation is the batch. Intervention batches will be examined in the opposite order by the two readers (one forwards, one backwards). Control batches will be read in the same order as one another, as is current standard practice. The hypothesis is that cancer detection rates will be higher in the intervention group because each readers’ peak performance will occur when examining different women’s mammograms. The trial will take place in 44 English breast screening centres for 1 year and 4 months. The primary outcome is cancer detection rate, which will be extracted from computer records after 1 year of the trial. The secondary outcomes include rate of disagreement between readers (a more statistically powerful surrogate for cancer detection rate), recall rate, positive predictive value, and interval cancer rate (cancers found between screening rounds which will be measured three years after the end of the trial). DISCUSSION: This is the first trial of an intervention to ameliorate a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN46603370 (submitted: 24 October 2012, date of registration: 26 March 2013). BioMed Central 2014-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3899604/ /pubmed/24411004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-17 Text en Copyright © 2014 Taylor-Phillips et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Taylor-Phillips, Sian Wallis, Matthew G Parsons, Helen Dunn, Janet Stallard, Nigel Campbell, Helen Sellars, Sarah Szczepura, Ala Gates, Simon Clarke, Aileen Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | changing case order to optimise patterns of performance in mammography screening (co-ops): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899604/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24411004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-17 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taylorphillipssian changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wallismatthewg changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parsonshelen changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dunnjanet changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT stallardnigel changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT campbellhelen changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sellarssarah changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT szczepuraala changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gatessimon changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT clarkeaileen changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |