Cargando…

Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: X-ray mammography remains the predominant test for screening for breast cancer, with the aim of reducing breast cancer mortality. In the English NHS Breast Screening Programme each woman’s mammograms are examined separately by two expert readers. The two readers read each batch in the sa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Taylor-Phillips, Sian, Wallis, Matthew G, Parsons, Helen, Dunn, Janet, Stallard, Nigel, Campbell, Helen, Sellars, Sarah, Szczepura, Ala, Gates, Simon, Clarke, Aileen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24411004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-17
_version_ 1782300599824416768
author Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Wallis, Matthew G
Parsons, Helen
Dunn, Janet
Stallard, Nigel
Campbell, Helen
Sellars, Sarah
Szczepura, Ala
Gates, Simon
Clarke, Aileen
author_facet Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Wallis, Matthew G
Parsons, Helen
Dunn, Janet
Stallard, Nigel
Campbell, Helen
Sellars, Sarah
Szczepura, Ala
Gates, Simon
Clarke, Aileen
author_sort Taylor-Phillips, Sian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: X-ray mammography remains the predominant test for screening for breast cancer, with the aim of reducing breast cancer mortality. In the English NHS Breast Screening Programme each woman’s mammograms are examined separately by two expert readers. The two readers read each batch in the same order and each indicates if there should be recall for further tests. This is a highly skilled, pressurised, repetitive and frequently intellectually unchallenging activity where readers examine one or more batches of 30–50 women’s mammograms in each session. A vigilance decrement or performance decrease over time has been observed in similar repetitive visual tasks such as radar operation. METHODS/DESIGN: The CO-OPS study is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm, double blind cluster randomised controlled trial of a computer software intervention designed to reduce the effects of a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening. The unit of randomisation is the batch. Intervention batches will be examined in the opposite order by the two readers (one forwards, one backwards). Control batches will be read in the same order as one another, as is current standard practice. The hypothesis is that cancer detection rates will be higher in the intervention group because each readers’ peak performance will occur when examining different women’s mammograms. The trial will take place in 44 English breast screening centres for 1 year and 4 months. The primary outcome is cancer detection rate, which will be extracted from computer records after 1 year of the trial. The secondary outcomes include rate of disagreement between readers (a more statistically powerful surrogate for cancer detection rate), recall rate, positive predictive value, and interval cancer rate (cancers found between screening rounds which will be measured three years after the end of the trial). DISCUSSION: This is the first trial of an intervention to ameliorate a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN46603370 (submitted: 24 October 2012, date of registration: 26 March 2013).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3899604
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38996042014-01-24 Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Taylor-Phillips, Sian Wallis, Matthew G Parsons, Helen Dunn, Janet Stallard, Nigel Campbell, Helen Sellars, Sarah Szczepura, Ala Gates, Simon Clarke, Aileen Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: X-ray mammography remains the predominant test for screening for breast cancer, with the aim of reducing breast cancer mortality. In the English NHS Breast Screening Programme each woman’s mammograms are examined separately by two expert readers. The two readers read each batch in the same order and each indicates if there should be recall for further tests. This is a highly skilled, pressurised, repetitive and frequently intellectually unchallenging activity where readers examine one or more batches of 30–50 women’s mammograms in each session. A vigilance decrement or performance decrease over time has been observed in similar repetitive visual tasks such as radar operation. METHODS/DESIGN: The CO-OPS study is a pragmatic, multi-centre, two-arm, double blind cluster randomised controlled trial of a computer software intervention designed to reduce the effects of a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening. The unit of randomisation is the batch. Intervention batches will be examined in the opposite order by the two readers (one forwards, one backwards). Control batches will be read in the same order as one another, as is current standard practice. The hypothesis is that cancer detection rates will be higher in the intervention group because each readers’ peak performance will occur when examining different women’s mammograms. The trial will take place in 44 English breast screening centres for 1 year and 4 months. The primary outcome is cancer detection rate, which will be extracted from computer records after 1 year of the trial. The secondary outcomes include rate of disagreement between readers (a more statistically powerful surrogate for cancer detection rate), recall rate, positive predictive value, and interval cancer rate (cancers found between screening rounds which will be measured three years after the end of the trial). DISCUSSION: This is the first trial of an intervention to ameliorate a vigilance decrement in breast cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN46603370 (submitted: 24 October 2012, date of registration: 26 March 2013). BioMed Central 2014-01-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3899604/ /pubmed/24411004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-17 Text en Copyright © 2014 Taylor-Phillips et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Taylor-Phillips, Sian
Wallis, Matthew G
Parsons, Helen
Dunn, Janet
Stallard, Nigel
Campbell, Helen
Sellars, Sarah
Szczepura, Ala
Gates, Simon
Clarke, Aileen
Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short Changing case Order to Optimise patterns of Performance in mammography Screening (CO-OPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort changing case order to optimise patterns of performance in mammography screening (co-ops): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899604/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24411004
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-17
work_keys_str_mv AT taylorphillipssian changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wallismatthewg changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parsonshelen changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT dunnjanet changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stallardnigel changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT campbellhelen changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sellarssarah changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT szczepuraala changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gatessimon changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkeaileen changingcaseordertooptimisepatternsofperformanceinmammographyscreeningcoopsstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial