Cargando…
Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study
BACKGROUND: Research is needed to identify challenges to developmental screening and strategies for screening in an urban pediatric setting. METHODS: Parents of young children and clinicians at four urban pediatric practices participated in focus groups prior to implementation of screening. Particip...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-16 |
_version_ | 1782300601211682816 |
---|---|
author | Morelli, Deanna L Pati, Susmita Butler, Anneliese Blum, Nathan J Gerdes, Marsha Pinto-Martin, Jennifer Guevara, James P |
author_facet | Morelli, Deanna L Pati, Susmita Butler, Anneliese Blum, Nathan J Gerdes, Marsha Pinto-Martin, Jennifer Guevara, James P |
author_sort | Morelli, Deanna L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Research is needed to identify challenges to developmental screening and strategies for screening in an urban pediatric setting. METHODS: Parents of young children and clinicians at four urban pediatric practices participated in focus groups prior to implementation of screening. Participants were queried regarding attitudes, social norms, and barriers to developmental screening. Using information from the focus groups, workflow strategies were developed for implementing screening. Referral rates and satisfaction with screening were gathered at the conclusion. RESULTS: Six focus groups of parents and clinicians were conducted. Major themes identified included 1) parents desired greater input on child development and increased time with physicians, 2) physicians did not fully trust parental input, 3) physicians preferred clinical acumen over screening tools, and 4) physicians lacked time and training to conduct screening. For the intervention, developmental screening was implemented at the 9-, 18-, 24-, and 30-month well visits using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire-II and the Modified Checklist for Toddlers. 1397 (98% of eligible) children under 36 months old were enrolled, and 1184 (84%) were screened at least once. 1002 parents (85%) completed a survey at the conclusion of the screening trial. Most parents reported no difficulty completing the screens (99%), felt the screens covered important areas of child development (98%), and felt they learned about their child’s strengths and limitations (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Developmental screening in urban low-income practices is feasible and acceptable, but requires strategies to capture parental input, provide training, facilitate referrals, and develop workflow procedures and electronic decision support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3899611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38996112014-01-24 Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study Morelli, Deanna L Pati, Susmita Butler, Anneliese Blum, Nathan J Gerdes, Marsha Pinto-Martin, Jennifer Guevara, James P BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Research is needed to identify challenges to developmental screening and strategies for screening in an urban pediatric setting. METHODS: Parents of young children and clinicians at four urban pediatric practices participated in focus groups prior to implementation of screening. Participants were queried regarding attitudes, social norms, and barriers to developmental screening. Using information from the focus groups, workflow strategies were developed for implementing screening. Referral rates and satisfaction with screening were gathered at the conclusion. RESULTS: Six focus groups of parents and clinicians were conducted. Major themes identified included 1) parents desired greater input on child development and increased time with physicians, 2) physicians did not fully trust parental input, 3) physicians preferred clinical acumen over screening tools, and 4) physicians lacked time and training to conduct screening. For the intervention, developmental screening was implemented at the 9-, 18-, 24-, and 30-month well visits using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire-II and the Modified Checklist for Toddlers. 1397 (98% of eligible) children under 36 months old were enrolled, and 1184 (84%) were screened at least once. 1002 parents (85%) completed a survey at the conclusion of the screening trial. Most parents reported no difficulty completing the screens (99%), felt the screens covered important areas of child development (98%), and felt they learned about their child’s strengths and limitations (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Developmental screening in urban low-income practices is feasible and acceptable, but requires strategies to capture parental input, provide training, facilitate referrals, and develop workflow procedures and electronic decision support. BioMed Central 2014-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3899611/ /pubmed/24447411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-16 Text en Copyright © 2014 Morelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Morelli, Deanna L Pati, Susmita Butler, Anneliese Blum, Nathan J Gerdes, Marsha Pinto-Martin, Jennifer Guevara, James P Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study |
title | Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study |
title_full | Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr | Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed | Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study |
title_short | Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study |
title_sort | challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-16 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morellideannal challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy AT patisusmita challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy AT butleranneliese challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy AT blumnathanj challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy AT gerdesmarsha challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy AT pintomartinjennifer challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy AT guevarajamesp challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy |