Cargando…

Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Research is needed to identify challenges to developmental screening and strategies for screening in an urban pediatric setting. METHODS: Parents of young children and clinicians at four urban pediatric practices participated in focus groups prior to implementation of screening. Particip...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morelli, Deanna L, Pati, Susmita, Butler, Anneliese, Blum, Nathan J, Gerdes, Marsha, Pinto-Martin, Jennifer, Guevara, James P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-16
_version_ 1782300601211682816
author Morelli, Deanna L
Pati, Susmita
Butler, Anneliese
Blum, Nathan J
Gerdes, Marsha
Pinto-Martin, Jennifer
Guevara, James P
author_facet Morelli, Deanna L
Pati, Susmita
Butler, Anneliese
Blum, Nathan J
Gerdes, Marsha
Pinto-Martin, Jennifer
Guevara, James P
author_sort Morelli, Deanna L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research is needed to identify challenges to developmental screening and strategies for screening in an urban pediatric setting. METHODS: Parents of young children and clinicians at four urban pediatric practices participated in focus groups prior to implementation of screening. Participants were queried regarding attitudes, social norms, and barriers to developmental screening. Using information from the focus groups, workflow strategies were developed for implementing screening. Referral rates and satisfaction with screening were gathered at the conclusion. RESULTS: Six focus groups of parents and clinicians were conducted. Major themes identified included 1) parents desired greater input on child development and increased time with physicians, 2) physicians did not fully trust parental input, 3) physicians preferred clinical acumen over screening tools, and 4) physicians lacked time and training to conduct screening. For the intervention, developmental screening was implemented at the 9-, 18-, 24-, and 30-month well visits using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire-II and the Modified Checklist for Toddlers. 1397 (98% of eligible) children under 36 months old were enrolled, and 1184 (84%) were screened at least once. 1002 parents (85%) completed a survey at the conclusion of the screening trial. Most parents reported no difficulty completing the screens (99%), felt the screens covered important areas of child development (98%), and felt they learned about their child’s strengths and limitations (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Developmental screening in urban low-income practices is feasible and acceptable, but requires strategies to capture parental input, provide training, facilitate referrals, and develop workflow procedures and electronic decision support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3899611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38996112014-01-24 Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study Morelli, Deanna L Pati, Susmita Butler, Anneliese Blum, Nathan J Gerdes, Marsha Pinto-Martin, Jennifer Guevara, James P BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Research is needed to identify challenges to developmental screening and strategies for screening in an urban pediatric setting. METHODS: Parents of young children and clinicians at four urban pediatric practices participated in focus groups prior to implementation of screening. Participants were queried regarding attitudes, social norms, and barriers to developmental screening. Using information from the focus groups, workflow strategies were developed for implementing screening. Referral rates and satisfaction with screening were gathered at the conclusion. RESULTS: Six focus groups of parents and clinicians were conducted. Major themes identified included 1) parents desired greater input on child development and increased time with physicians, 2) physicians did not fully trust parental input, 3) physicians preferred clinical acumen over screening tools, and 4) physicians lacked time and training to conduct screening. For the intervention, developmental screening was implemented at the 9-, 18-, 24-, and 30-month well visits using the Ages & Stages Questionnaire-II and the Modified Checklist for Toddlers. 1397 (98% of eligible) children under 36 months old were enrolled, and 1184 (84%) were screened at least once. 1002 parents (85%) completed a survey at the conclusion of the screening trial. Most parents reported no difficulty completing the screens (99%), felt the screens covered important areas of child development (98%), and felt they learned about their child’s strengths and limitations (88%). CONCLUSIONS: Developmental screening in urban low-income practices is feasible and acceptable, but requires strategies to capture parental input, provide training, facilitate referrals, and develop workflow procedures and electronic decision support. BioMed Central 2014-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3899611/ /pubmed/24447411 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-16 Text en Copyright © 2014 Morelli et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Morelli, Deanna L
Pati, Susmita
Butler, Anneliese
Blum, Nathan J
Gerdes, Marsha
Pinto-Martin, Jennifer
Guevara, James P
Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study
title Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study
title_full Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study
title_short Challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study
title_sort challenges to implementation of developmental screening in urban primary care: a mixed methods study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447411
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-14-16
work_keys_str_mv AT morellideannal challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT patisusmita challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT butleranneliese challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT blumnathanj challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT gerdesmarsha challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT pintomartinjennifer challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy
AT guevarajamesp challengestoimplementationofdevelopmentalscreeninginurbanprimarycareamixedmethodsstudy