Cargando…

The importance of the implant quality in APBI – Gliwice experience. Dosimetric evaluation

This study includes four years of our clinical trials to improve implant quality in multicatheter accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The progress in dosimetric and volumetric parameters of the treatment plans was evaluated. One hundred and ninety-one women, for whom treatment plans were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cholewka, Agnieszka, Szlag, Marta, Białas, Brygida, Kellas-Ślęczka, Sylwia, Ślosarek, Krzysztof
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24474972
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.39365
_version_ 1782300607411912704
author Cholewka, Agnieszka
Szlag, Marta
Białas, Brygida
Kellas-Ślęczka, Sylwia
Ślosarek, Krzysztof
author_facet Cholewka, Agnieszka
Szlag, Marta
Białas, Brygida
Kellas-Ślęczka, Sylwia
Ślosarek, Krzysztof
author_sort Cholewka, Agnieszka
collection PubMed
description This study includes four years of our clinical trials to improve implant quality in multicatheter accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The progress in dosimetric and volumetric parameters of the treatment plans was evaluated. One hundred and ninety-one women, for whom treatment plans were made based on three dimensional imaging, were selected for the study. To evaluate progress made in our APBI procedure, following parameters and indices were taken into account: percentage of the target volume receiving the reference dose (PTV(ref)), minimum dose in the target volume expressed as a percentage of reference dose (PTV(min)), dose homogeneity index (DHI), and conformity index (COIN). Additionally, the plan quality index was calculated for every group as the sum of mean values of four evaluated parameters. PTV(ref) have increased from the mean value of 83.4% at the beginning to recent 94.8%. The maximum value equals to 95.4%. The same trend can be observed with PTV(min) value, which has been improved from 51.7% to 70.1%, maximally. DHI and COIN mean values present similar progress. DHI value increased from 0.53 level to 0.68, and COIN from 0.58 in 2009 to 0.74. Plan quality index has increased from 2.46 in 2009 to 3.06, recently. The implant quality is crucial for the accurate dose distribution. This paper shows the progress that was made in APBI procedure to improve implant quality. Nowadays, our implant technique is based on three-dimensional CT imaging results in acceptable dose distributions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3899638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38996382014-01-28 The importance of the implant quality in APBI – Gliwice experience. Dosimetric evaluation Cholewka, Agnieszka Szlag, Marta Białas, Brygida Kellas-Ślęczka, Sylwia Ślosarek, Krzysztof J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Paper This study includes four years of our clinical trials to improve implant quality in multicatheter accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). The progress in dosimetric and volumetric parameters of the treatment plans was evaluated. One hundred and ninety-one women, for whom treatment plans were made based on three dimensional imaging, were selected for the study. To evaluate progress made in our APBI procedure, following parameters and indices were taken into account: percentage of the target volume receiving the reference dose (PTV(ref)), minimum dose in the target volume expressed as a percentage of reference dose (PTV(min)), dose homogeneity index (DHI), and conformity index (COIN). Additionally, the plan quality index was calculated for every group as the sum of mean values of four evaluated parameters. PTV(ref) have increased from the mean value of 83.4% at the beginning to recent 94.8%. The maximum value equals to 95.4%. The same trend can be observed with PTV(min) value, which has been improved from 51.7% to 70.1%, maximally. DHI and COIN mean values present similar progress. DHI value increased from 0.53 level to 0.68, and COIN from 0.58 in 2009 to 0.74. Plan quality index has increased from 2.46 in 2009 to 3.06, recently. The implant quality is crucial for the accurate dose distribution. This paper shows the progress that was made in APBI procedure to improve implant quality. Nowadays, our implant technique is based on three-dimensional CT imaging results in acceptable dose distributions. Termedia Publishing House 2013-12-05 2013-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3899638/ /pubmed/24474972 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.39365 Text en Copyright © 2013 Termedia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Cholewka, Agnieszka
Szlag, Marta
Białas, Brygida
Kellas-Ślęczka, Sylwia
Ślosarek, Krzysztof
The importance of the implant quality in APBI – Gliwice experience. Dosimetric evaluation
title The importance of the implant quality in APBI – Gliwice experience. Dosimetric evaluation
title_full The importance of the implant quality in APBI – Gliwice experience. Dosimetric evaluation
title_fullStr The importance of the implant quality in APBI – Gliwice experience. Dosimetric evaluation
title_full_unstemmed The importance of the implant quality in APBI – Gliwice experience. Dosimetric evaluation
title_short The importance of the implant quality in APBI – Gliwice experience. Dosimetric evaluation
title_sort importance of the implant quality in apbi – gliwice experience. dosimetric evaluation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24474972
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2013.39365
work_keys_str_mv AT cholewkaagnieszka theimportanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation
AT szlagmarta theimportanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation
AT białasbrygida theimportanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation
AT kellassleczkasylwia theimportanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation
AT slosarekkrzysztof theimportanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation
AT cholewkaagnieszka importanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation
AT szlagmarta importanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation
AT białasbrygida importanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation
AT kellassleczkasylwia importanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation
AT slosarekkrzysztof importanceoftheimplantqualityinapbigliwiceexperiencedosimetricevaluation