Cargando…

Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats

Animals have co-evolved with mutualistic microbial communities, known as the microbiota, which are essential for organ development and function. We hypothesize that modern animal husbandry practices exert an impact on the intestinal microbiota. In this study, we compared the structure of the fecal m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M., Godoy-Vitorino, Filipa, Piceno, Yvette M., Tom, Lauren M., Pantoja-Feliciano, Ida G., Rivera-Rivera, Michelle J., Andersen, Gary L., Domínguez-Bello, María G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24704840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes3010001
_version_ 1782300640101269504
author De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M.
Godoy-Vitorino, Filipa
Piceno, Yvette M.
Tom, Lauren M.
Pantoja-Feliciano, Ida G.
Rivera-Rivera, Michelle J.
Andersen, Gary L.
Domínguez-Bello, María G.
author_facet De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M.
Godoy-Vitorino, Filipa
Piceno, Yvette M.
Tom, Lauren M.
Pantoja-Feliciano, Ida G.
Rivera-Rivera, Michelle J.
Andersen, Gary L.
Domínguez-Bello, María G.
author_sort De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M.
collection PubMed
description Animals have co-evolved with mutualistic microbial communities, known as the microbiota, which are essential for organ development and function. We hypothesize that modern animal husbandry practices exert an impact on the intestinal microbiota. In this study, we compared the structure of the fecal microbiota between feral and domestic goats using the G2 PhyloChip and assessed the presence of five tetracycline resistance genes [tet(M), tet(S), tet(O), tet(Q) and tet(W)] by PCR. Feces were collected from 10 goats: 5 domestic from a farm in the main island of Puerto Rico and 5 feral from the remote dry island of Mona. There were 42 bacterial phyla from 153 families detected in the goats’ feces. A total of 84 PhyloChip-OTUs were different in the fecal microbiota of feral and domestic goat. Both feral and domestic goats carried antibiotic resistance genes tet(O) and tet(W), but domestic goats additionally carried tet(Q). Diet, host genetics and antibiotic exposure are likely determinant factors in shaping the intestinal microbiota and may explain the differences observed between feral and domestic goats fecal microbiota.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3899958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-38999582014-03-26 Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M. Godoy-Vitorino, Filipa Piceno, Yvette M. Tom, Lauren M. Pantoja-Feliciano, Ida G. Rivera-Rivera, Michelle J. Andersen, Gary L. Domínguez-Bello, María G. Genes (Basel) Article Animals have co-evolved with mutualistic microbial communities, known as the microbiota, which are essential for organ development and function. We hypothesize that modern animal husbandry practices exert an impact on the intestinal microbiota. In this study, we compared the structure of the fecal microbiota between feral and domestic goats using the G2 PhyloChip and assessed the presence of five tetracycline resistance genes [tet(M), tet(S), tet(O), tet(Q) and tet(W)] by PCR. Feces were collected from 10 goats: 5 domestic from a farm in the main island of Puerto Rico and 5 feral from the remote dry island of Mona. There were 42 bacterial phyla from 153 families detected in the goats’ feces. A total of 84 PhyloChip-OTUs were different in the fecal microbiota of feral and domestic goat. Both feral and domestic goats carried antibiotic resistance genes tet(O) and tet(W), but domestic goats additionally carried tet(Q). Diet, host genetics and antibiotic exposure are likely determinant factors in shaping the intestinal microbiota and may explain the differences observed between feral and domestic goats fecal microbiota. MDPI 2011-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3899958/ /pubmed/24704840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes3010001 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M.
Godoy-Vitorino, Filipa
Piceno, Yvette M.
Tom, Lauren M.
Pantoja-Feliciano, Ida G.
Rivera-Rivera, Michelle J.
Andersen, Gary L.
Domínguez-Bello, María G.
Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats
title Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats
title_full Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats
title_fullStr Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats
title_short Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats
title_sort comparison of the fecal microbiota in feral and domestic goats
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24704840
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes3010001
work_keys_str_mv AT dejesuslaboykassandram comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats
AT godoyvitorinofilipa comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats
AT picenoyvettem comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats
AT tomlaurenm comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats
AT pantojafelicianoidag comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats
AT riverariveramichellej comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats
AT andersengaryl comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats
AT dominguezbellomariag comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats