Cargando…
Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats
Animals have co-evolved with mutualistic microbial communities, known as the microbiota, which are essential for organ development and function. We hypothesize that modern animal husbandry practices exert an impact on the intestinal microbiota. In this study, we compared the structure of the fecal m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24704840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes3010001 |
_version_ | 1782300640101269504 |
---|---|
author | De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M. Godoy-Vitorino, Filipa Piceno, Yvette M. Tom, Lauren M. Pantoja-Feliciano, Ida G. Rivera-Rivera, Michelle J. Andersen, Gary L. Domínguez-Bello, María G. |
author_facet | De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M. Godoy-Vitorino, Filipa Piceno, Yvette M. Tom, Lauren M. Pantoja-Feliciano, Ida G. Rivera-Rivera, Michelle J. Andersen, Gary L. Domínguez-Bello, María G. |
author_sort | De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animals have co-evolved with mutualistic microbial communities, known as the microbiota, which are essential for organ development and function. We hypothesize that modern animal husbandry practices exert an impact on the intestinal microbiota. In this study, we compared the structure of the fecal microbiota between feral and domestic goats using the G2 PhyloChip and assessed the presence of five tetracycline resistance genes [tet(M), tet(S), tet(O), tet(Q) and tet(W)] by PCR. Feces were collected from 10 goats: 5 domestic from a farm in the main island of Puerto Rico and 5 feral from the remote dry island of Mona. There were 42 bacterial phyla from 153 families detected in the goats’ feces. A total of 84 PhyloChip-OTUs were different in the fecal microbiota of feral and domestic goat. Both feral and domestic goats carried antibiotic resistance genes tet(O) and tet(W), but domestic goats additionally carried tet(Q). Diet, host genetics and antibiotic exposure are likely determinant factors in shaping the intestinal microbiota and may explain the differences observed between feral and domestic goats fecal microbiota. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3899958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-38999582014-03-26 Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M. Godoy-Vitorino, Filipa Piceno, Yvette M. Tom, Lauren M. Pantoja-Feliciano, Ida G. Rivera-Rivera, Michelle J. Andersen, Gary L. Domínguez-Bello, María G. Genes (Basel) Article Animals have co-evolved with mutualistic microbial communities, known as the microbiota, which are essential for organ development and function. We hypothesize that modern animal husbandry practices exert an impact on the intestinal microbiota. In this study, we compared the structure of the fecal microbiota between feral and domestic goats using the G2 PhyloChip and assessed the presence of five tetracycline resistance genes [tet(M), tet(S), tet(O), tet(Q) and tet(W)] by PCR. Feces were collected from 10 goats: 5 domestic from a farm in the main island of Puerto Rico and 5 feral from the remote dry island of Mona. There were 42 bacterial phyla from 153 families detected in the goats’ feces. A total of 84 PhyloChip-OTUs were different in the fecal microbiota of feral and domestic goat. Both feral and domestic goats carried antibiotic resistance genes tet(O) and tet(W), but domestic goats additionally carried tet(Q). Diet, host genetics and antibiotic exposure are likely determinant factors in shaping the intestinal microbiota and may explain the differences observed between feral and domestic goats fecal microbiota. MDPI 2011-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3899958/ /pubmed/24704840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes3010001 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article De Jesús-Laboy, Kassandra M. Godoy-Vitorino, Filipa Piceno, Yvette M. Tom, Lauren M. Pantoja-Feliciano, Ida G. Rivera-Rivera, Michelle J. Andersen, Gary L. Domínguez-Bello, María G. Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats |
title | Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats |
title_full | Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats |
title_short | Comparison of the Fecal Microbiota in Feral and Domestic Goats |
title_sort | comparison of the fecal microbiota in feral and domestic goats |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3899958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24704840 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes3010001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dejesuslaboykassandram comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats AT godoyvitorinofilipa comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats AT picenoyvettem comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats AT tomlaurenm comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats AT pantojafelicianoidag comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats AT riverariveramichellej comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats AT andersengaryl comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats AT dominguezbellomariag comparisonofthefecalmicrobiotainferalanddomesticgoats |