Cargando…

Using BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ to understand the impact of the preanalytical phase on sample quality and safety, a multi country perspective

BACKGROUND: The complexity of the preanalytical (PA) phase has precluded standardisation of PA processes, despite its impact on sample quality, laboratory efficiency, or patient & healthcare worker safety. The BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ Preanalytical Review audits PA procedures and pract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schlueter, K, Nauck, M, Petersmann, A, Church, S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900067/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.028
_version_ 1782300654085079040
author Schlueter, K
Nauck, M
Petersmann, A
Church, S
author_facet Schlueter, K
Nauck, M
Petersmann, A
Church, S
author_sort Schlueter, K
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The complexity of the preanalytical (PA) phase has precluded standardisation of PA processes, despite its impact on sample quality, laboratory efficiency, or patient & healthcare worker safety. The BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ Preanalytical Review audits PA procedures and practices in hospitals in different countries. Processes were assessed from storage of blood collection materials through specimen collection, transportation, processing of the samples and the resulting sample quality. By following the samples through the complete process, it was possible to link specific PA attributes to sample quality deficiencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consistent method and data collection form were used for audits (N = 48) of all blood collection systems. Data were collected by observation of the PA phase. Sample quality was assessed for laboratory samples of the same type. RESULTS: The PA phase was observed for 3597 blood collection tubes over 1350 collections. Sample quality was assessed for 8016 chemistry and 3532 coagulation tubes. For collections that resulted in hemolysed samples, 48% had prolonged use of tourniquet, 31% used catheters and for 38% the disinfectant was not allowed to dry. For serum samples with fibrin where the PA process had been observed, 26% had less than 30 minutes between collection and centrifugation and 81% had not been mixed. The following list gives the percentage of collections where a particular behaviour was observed, incorrect patient identification procedure, 56%; tubes labelled prior to collection 61%; coagulation tubes filled to less than 90% of tube volume 7%; gloves not worn 37%; incorrect activation of needle safety device 19%. CONCLUSIONS: The BD Preanalytical Review standardised audit methodology allows comparison of results between departments and institutions. The prospective nature of the reviews permits identification of issues based on more data than from rejected samples alone and therefore affords a more complete understanding for those involved in the PA phase.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3900067
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39000672014-01-23 Using BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ to understand the impact of the preanalytical phase on sample quality and safety, a multi country perspective Schlueter, K Nauck, M Petersmann, A Church, S Biochem Med (Zagreb) Erratum BACKGROUND: The complexity of the preanalytical (PA) phase has precluded standardisation of PA processes, despite its impact on sample quality, laboratory efficiency, or patient & healthcare worker safety. The BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ Preanalytical Review audits PA procedures and practices in hospitals in different countries. Processes were assessed from storage of blood collection materials through specimen collection, transportation, processing of the samples and the resulting sample quality. By following the samples through the complete process, it was possible to link specific PA attributes to sample quality deficiencies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consistent method and data collection form were used for audits (N = 48) of all blood collection systems. Data were collected by observation of the PA phase. Sample quality was assessed for laboratory samples of the same type. RESULTS: The PA phase was observed for 3597 blood collection tubes over 1350 collections. Sample quality was assessed for 8016 chemistry and 3532 coagulation tubes. For collections that resulted in hemolysed samples, 48% had prolonged use of tourniquet, 31% used catheters and for 38% the disinfectant was not allowed to dry. For serum samples with fibrin where the PA process had been observed, 26% had less than 30 minutes between collection and centrifugation and 81% had not been mixed. The following list gives the percentage of collections where a particular behaviour was observed, incorrect patient identification procedure, 56%; tubes labelled prior to collection 61%; coagulation tubes filled to less than 90% of tube volume 7%; gloves not worn 37%; incorrect activation of needle safety device 19%. CONCLUSIONS: The BD Preanalytical Review standardised audit methodology allows comparison of results between departments and institutions. The prospective nature of the reviews permits identification of issues based on more data than from rejected samples alone and therefore affords a more complete understanding for those involved in the PA phase. Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2013-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3900067/ http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.028 Text en ©Copyright by Croatian Society of Medical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Erratum
Schlueter, K
Nauck, M
Petersmann, A
Church, S
Using BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ to understand the impact of the preanalytical phase on sample quality and safety, a multi country perspective
title Using BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ to understand the impact of the preanalytical phase on sample quality and safety, a multi country perspective
title_full Using BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ to understand the impact of the preanalytical phase on sample quality and safety, a multi country perspective
title_fullStr Using BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ to understand the impact of the preanalytical phase on sample quality and safety, a multi country perspective
title_full_unstemmed Using BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ to understand the impact of the preanalytical phase on sample quality and safety, a multi country perspective
title_short Using BD Laboratory Consulting Services™ to understand the impact of the preanalytical phase on sample quality and safety, a multi country perspective
title_sort using bd laboratory consulting services™ to understand the impact of the preanalytical phase on sample quality and safety, a multi country perspective
topic Erratum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900067/
http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2013.028
work_keys_str_mv AT schlueterk usingbdlaboratoryconsultingservicestounderstandtheimpactofthepreanalyticalphaseonsamplequalityandsafetyamulticountryperspective
AT nauckm usingbdlaboratoryconsultingservicestounderstandtheimpactofthepreanalyticalphaseonsamplequalityandsafetyamulticountryperspective
AT petersmanna usingbdlaboratoryconsultingservicestounderstandtheimpactofthepreanalyticalphaseonsamplequalityandsafetyamulticountryperspective
AT churchs usingbdlaboratoryconsultingservicestounderstandtheimpactofthepreanalyticalphaseonsamplequalityandsafetyamulticountryperspective