Cargando…

Opening peer-review: the democracy of science

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Shanahan, Daniel R, Olsen, Bjorn R
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2014
Materias:	Editorial
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3900934/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-5751-13-2

Ejemplares similares

An open democracy
por: Mathur, Shawn, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Science, democracy and emerging threats to scientific progress
por: Feller, Stephan M
Publicado: (2012)

Behavioral Sciences: An International, Open-Access, Peer Reviewed Journal
por: Coverdale, John
Publicado: (2011)

On the evolving open peer review culture for chemical information science
por: Walters, W. Patrick, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Consensus Science and the Peer Review
por: Barrio, Jorge R.
Publicado: (2009)

Peering into peer-review at GigaScience
por: Edmunds, Scott C
Publicado: (2013)

Modernities, Sciences, and Democracy
por: Harding, Sandra
Publicado: (2009)

Preparing democracies for pandemics
por: Bollyky, Thomas J, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Science and society: science, truth and democracy
por: Dale, J
Publicado: (2002)

Open access, open data and peer review
por: Ule, Jernej
Publicado: (2020)

Reinvigorating the Role of Science in Democracy
por: Rosenberg, Andrew A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Peer reviewers – The gate keepers of science
por: Kekre, Nitin S.
Publicado: (2009)

An Open Science Peer Review Oath
por: Aleksic, Jelena, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation
por: Jasanoff, Sheila
Publicado: (2010)

Afterword: Science popularization, dictatorships, and democracies
por: Somsen, Geert
Publicado: (2022)

Open access, predatory publishing and peer-review
por: Fernandez-Llimos, Fernando
Publicado: (2014)

The Open Medicine student peer review program
por: Lail, Parabhdeep, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Editorial: Peer review vs. open posting
Publicado: (2012)

Health democracy, from one crisis to another
por: Alla, François
Publicado: (2022)

First CytoJournal Peer-Reviewer's Retreat in 2006 – Open access, peer-review, and impact factor
por: Shidham, Vinod B, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

The purpose of peer review in the case of an open-access publication
por: Alexandrov, Georgii A
Publicado: (2006)

JGES: An Open Access Peer Reviewed Journal is Born
por: Pai, Hrishikesh
Publicado: (2009)

Transparent peer review and open data at Communications Biology
Publicado: (2019)

Preserving a Space for Science in an Age of Democracy
por: Collins, Harry
Publicado: (2010)

Pattern of health promises for Indian democracy: A qualitative review of political manifestos
por: Kumar, Dinesh, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Appreciations to Peer Reviewers for Journal of Korean Medical Science 2017
por: Hong, Sung-Tae
Publicado: (2018)

Democracy, economics, or health-Time to look to the east for leadership
por: Raina, Sunil K., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

A community experiment with fully open and published peer review
por: Koonin, Eugene V, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Virtual slides in peer reviewed, open access medical publication
por: Kayser, Klaus, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Democracy and Doctors
por: Paddock, R. H.
Publicado: (1852)

Nuisance or necessity? Why robust peer review is critical for medical science
por: Patricios, Jon, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Open science prevents mindless science
por: Munafò, Marcus R, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Biology direct: celebrating 7 years of open, published peer review
por: Koonin, Eugene V, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Republication of “FAO: The Open Source for High-quality Peer Reviewed Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Content”
por: Daniel Latt, L.
Publicado: (2023)

The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review
por: Morey, Richard D., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Opening up Peer Review in Life: Towards a Transparent and Reliable Process
por: Rampelotto, Pabulo Henrique
Publicado: (2014)

Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher
por: Henriquez, Tania
Publicado: (2023)

Science and democracy: making knowledge and making power in the biosciences and beyond
por: Hilgartner, Stephen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Yes, democracy is good for our health—but which democracy?
por: Dall’Alba, Rafael, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Peer Review Processes and Desirable Attitudes for Peer Reviewers
por: Chung, Kyu Jin
Publicado: (2017)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_go6qug4m3vkhik0ghk7nbgnpon