Cargando…
Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?
BACKGROUND: The health care quality improvement movement is a complex enterprise. Implementing clinical quality initiatives requires attitude and behaviour change on the part of clinicians, but this has proven to be difficult. In an attempt to solve this kind of behavioural challenge, the theoretica...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-530 |
_version_ | 1782300838355533824 |
---|---|
author | Lipworth, Wendy Taylor, Natalie Braithwaite, Jeffrey |
author_facet | Lipworth, Wendy Taylor, Natalie Braithwaite, Jeffrey |
author_sort | Lipworth, Wendy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The health care quality improvement movement is a complex enterprise. Implementing clinical quality initiatives requires attitude and behaviour change on the part of clinicians, but this has proven to be difficult. In an attempt to solve this kind of behavioural challenge, the theoretical domains framework (TDF) has been developed. The TDF consists of 14 domains from psychological and organisational theory said to influence behaviour change. No systematic research has been conducted into the ways in which clinical quality initiatives map on to the domains of the framework. We therefore conducted a qualitative mapping experiment to determine to what extent, and in what ways, the TDF is relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions. METHODS: We conducted a thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature exploring clinicians’ perceptions of various clinical quality interventions. We analysed and synthesised 50 studies in total, in five domains of clinical quality interventions: clinical quality interventions in general, structural interventions, audit-type interventions, interventions aimed at making practice more evidence-based, and risk management interventions. Data were analysed thematically, followed by synthesis of these themes into categories and concepts, which were then mapped to the domains of the TDF. RESULTS: Our results suggest that the TDF is highly relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions. It can be used to map most, if not all, of the attitudinal and behavioural barriers and facilitators of uptake of clinical quality interventions. Each of these 14 domains appeared to be relevant to many different types of clinical quality interventions. One possible additional domain might relate to perceived trustworthiness of those instituting clinical quality interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The TDF can be usefully applied to a wide range of clinical quality interventions. Because all 14 of the domains emerged as relevant, and we did not identify any obvious differences between different kinds of clinical quality interventions, our findings support an initially broad approach to identifying barriers and facilitators, followed by a “drilling down” to what is most contextually salient. In future, it may be possible to establish a model of clinical quality policy implementation using the TDF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3901331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39013312014-01-25 Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? Lipworth, Wendy Taylor, Natalie Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The health care quality improvement movement is a complex enterprise. Implementing clinical quality initiatives requires attitude and behaviour change on the part of clinicians, but this has proven to be difficult. In an attempt to solve this kind of behavioural challenge, the theoretical domains framework (TDF) has been developed. The TDF consists of 14 domains from psychological and organisational theory said to influence behaviour change. No systematic research has been conducted into the ways in which clinical quality initiatives map on to the domains of the framework. We therefore conducted a qualitative mapping experiment to determine to what extent, and in what ways, the TDF is relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions. METHODS: We conducted a thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature exploring clinicians’ perceptions of various clinical quality interventions. We analysed and synthesised 50 studies in total, in five domains of clinical quality interventions: clinical quality interventions in general, structural interventions, audit-type interventions, interventions aimed at making practice more evidence-based, and risk management interventions. Data were analysed thematically, followed by synthesis of these themes into categories and concepts, which were then mapped to the domains of the TDF. RESULTS: Our results suggest that the TDF is highly relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions. It can be used to map most, if not all, of the attitudinal and behavioural barriers and facilitators of uptake of clinical quality interventions. Each of these 14 domains appeared to be relevant to many different types of clinical quality interventions. One possible additional domain might relate to perceived trustworthiness of those instituting clinical quality interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The TDF can be usefully applied to a wide range of clinical quality interventions. Because all 14 of the domains emerged as relevant, and we did not identify any obvious differences between different kinds of clinical quality interventions, our findings support an initially broad approach to identifying barriers and facilitators, followed by a “drilling down” to what is most contextually salient. In future, it may be possible to establish a model of clinical quality policy implementation using the TDF. BioMed Central 2013-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3901331/ /pubmed/24359085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-530 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lipworth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lipworth, Wendy Taylor, Natalie Braithwaite, Jeffrey Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? |
title | Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? |
title_full | Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? |
title_fullStr | Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? |
title_short | Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? |
title_sort | can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-530 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lipworthwendy canthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkaccountfortheimplementationofclinicalqualityinterventions AT taylornatalie canthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkaccountfortheimplementationofclinicalqualityinterventions AT braithwaitejeffrey canthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkaccountfortheimplementationofclinicalqualityinterventions |