Cargando…

Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?

BACKGROUND: The health care quality improvement movement is a complex enterprise. Implementing clinical quality initiatives requires attitude and behaviour change on the part of clinicians, but this has proven to be difficult. In an attempt to solve this kind of behavioural challenge, the theoretica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lipworth, Wendy, Taylor, Natalie, Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-530
_version_ 1782300838355533824
author Lipworth, Wendy
Taylor, Natalie
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_facet Lipworth, Wendy
Taylor, Natalie
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
author_sort Lipworth, Wendy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The health care quality improvement movement is a complex enterprise. Implementing clinical quality initiatives requires attitude and behaviour change on the part of clinicians, but this has proven to be difficult. In an attempt to solve this kind of behavioural challenge, the theoretical domains framework (TDF) has been developed. The TDF consists of 14 domains from psychological and organisational theory said to influence behaviour change. No systematic research has been conducted into the ways in which clinical quality initiatives map on to the domains of the framework. We therefore conducted a qualitative mapping experiment to determine to what extent, and in what ways, the TDF is relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions. METHODS: We conducted a thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature exploring clinicians’ perceptions of various clinical quality interventions. We analysed and synthesised 50 studies in total, in five domains of clinical quality interventions: clinical quality interventions in general, structural interventions, audit-type interventions, interventions aimed at making practice more evidence-based, and risk management interventions. Data were analysed thematically, followed by synthesis of these themes into categories and concepts, which were then mapped to the domains of the TDF. RESULTS: Our results suggest that the TDF is highly relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions. It can be used to map most, if not all, of the attitudinal and behavioural barriers and facilitators of uptake of clinical quality interventions. Each of these 14 domains appeared to be relevant to many different types of clinical quality interventions. One possible additional domain might relate to perceived trustworthiness of those instituting clinical quality interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The TDF can be usefully applied to a wide range of clinical quality interventions. Because all 14 of the domains emerged as relevant, and we did not identify any obvious differences between different kinds of clinical quality interventions, our findings support an initially broad approach to identifying barriers and facilitators, followed by a “drilling down” to what is most contextually salient. In future, it may be possible to establish a model of clinical quality policy implementation using the TDF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3901331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39013312014-01-25 Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions? Lipworth, Wendy Taylor, Natalie Braithwaite, Jeffrey BMC Health Serv Res Research Article BACKGROUND: The health care quality improvement movement is a complex enterprise. Implementing clinical quality initiatives requires attitude and behaviour change on the part of clinicians, but this has proven to be difficult. In an attempt to solve this kind of behavioural challenge, the theoretical domains framework (TDF) has been developed. The TDF consists of 14 domains from psychological and organisational theory said to influence behaviour change. No systematic research has been conducted into the ways in which clinical quality initiatives map on to the domains of the framework. We therefore conducted a qualitative mapping experiment to determine to what extent, and in what ways, the TDF is relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions. METHODS: We conducted a thematic synthesis of the qualitative literature exploring clinicians’ perceptions of various clinical quality interventions. We analysed and synthesised 50 studies in total, in five domains of clinical quality interventions: clinical quality interventions in general, structural interventions, audit-type interventions, interventions aimed at making practice more evidence-based, and risk management interventions. Data were analysed thematically, followed by synthesis of these themes into categories and concepts, which were then mapped to the domains of the TDF. RESULTS: Our results suggest that the TDF is highly relevant to the implementation of clinical quality interventions. It can be used to map most, if not all, of the attitudinal and behavioural barriers and facilitators of uptake of clinical quality interventions. Each of these 14 domains appeared to be relevant to many different types of clinical quality interventions. One possible additional domain might relate to perceived trustworthiness of those instituting clinical quality interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The TDF can be usefully applied to a wide range of clinical quality interventions. Because all 14 of the domains emerged as relevant, and we did not identify any obvious differences between different kinds of clinical quality interventions, our findings support an initially broad approach to identifying barriers and facilitators, followed by a “drilling down” to what is most contextually salient. In future, it may be possible to establish a model of clinical quality policy implementation using the TDF. BioMed Central 2013-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3901331/ /pubmed/24359085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-530 Text en Copyright © 2013 Lipworth et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lipworth, Wendy
Taylor, Natalie
Braithwaite, Jeffrey
Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?
title Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?
title_full Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?
title_fullStr Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?
title_full_unstemmed Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?
title_short Can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?
title_sort can the theoretical domains framework account for the implementation of clinical quality interventions?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24359085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-530
work_keys_str_mv AT lipworthwendy canthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkaccountfortheimplementationofclinicalqualityinterventions
AT taylornatalie canthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkaccountfortheimplementationofclinicalqualityinterventions
AT braithwaitejeffrey canthetheoreticaldomainsframeworkaccountfortheimplementationofclinicalqualityinterventions