Cargando…

Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany

The German AMNOG healthcare reform includes a mandatory early-benefit-assessment (EBA) at launch. As per German social code, EBA is based on registration trials and includes evaluation of the patient-relevant effect of the new medicines compared to an appropriate comparator as defined by the Federal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dabisch, Inna, Dethling, Jürgen, Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos, Drechsler, Melanie, Kalanovic, Daniel, Kaskel, Peter, Langer, Frank, Ruof, Jörg, Ruppert, Thorsten, Wirth, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-4-2
_version_ 1782300841829466112
author Dabisch, Inna
Dethling, Jürgen
Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos
Drechsler, Melanie
Kalanovic, Daniel
Kaskel, Peter
Langer, Frank
Ruof, Jörg
Ruppert, Thorsten
Wirth, Daniel
author_facet Dabisch, Inna
Dethling, Jürgen
Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos
Drechsler, Melanie
Kalanovic, Daniel
Kaskel, Peter
Langer, Frank
Ruof, Jörg
Ruppert, Thorsten
Wirth, Daniel
author_sort Dabisch, Inna
collection PubMed
description The German AMNOG healthcare reform includes a mandatory early-benefit-assessment (EBA) at launch. As per German social code, EBA is based on registration trials and includes evaluation of the patient-relevant effect of the new medicines compared to an appropriate comparator as defined by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Current EBA decisions released have unveiled issues regarding the acceptance of some patient-relevant endpoints as G-BA and IQWiG are grading the endpoints, focusing on overall survival as the preferred endpoint in oncology. A taskforce of experienced German outcomes research, medical, health-technology assessment and biostatistics researchers in industry was appointed. After agreement on core assumptions, a draft position was prepared. Input on iterative versions was solicited from a panel of reviewers from industry and external stakeholders. Distinctive features of registration trials in oncology need to be considered when these studies form basis for EBA, especially in cancer-indications with long post-progression survival; and with several consecutive therapeutic options available post-progression. Ethical committees, caregivers and patients often demand cross-over-designs diluting the treatment-effect on overall survival. Regulatory authorities require evaluation of morbidity-related study endpoints including survival of patients without their disease getting worse (i.e., progression-free survival). Also, progression requires treatment-changes, another strong indicator for its relevance to patients. Based on specific guidelines and clinical trial programs that were developed to be consistent with regulatory guidance, endpoints in oncology are thoroughly evaluated in terms of their patient-relevance. This extensive knowledge and experience should be fully acknowledged during EBA when assessing the patient-relevant benefit of innovative medicines in oncology. JEL CODES: D61; H51; I18.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3901346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39013462014-02-06 Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany Dabisch, Inna Dethling, Jürgen Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos Drechsler, Melanie Kalanovic, Daniel Kaskel, Peter Langer, Frank Ruof, Jörg Ruppert, Thorsten Wirth, Daniel Health Econ Rev Review The German AMNOG healthcare reform includes a mandatory early-benefit-assessment (EBA) at launch. As per German social code, EBA is based on registration trials and includes evaluation of the patient-relevant effect of the new medicines compared to an appropriate comparator as defined by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Current EBA decisions released have unveiled issues regarding the acceptance of some patient-relevant endpoints as G-BA and IQWiG are grading the endpoints, focusing on overall survival as the preferred endpoint in oncology. A taskforce of experienced German outcomes research, medical, health-technology assessment and biostatistics researchers in industry was appointed. After agreement on core assumptions, a draft position was prepared. Input on iterative versions was solicited from a panel of reviewers from industry and external stakeholders. Distinctive features of registration trials in oncology need to be considered when these studies form basis for EBA, especially in cancer-indications with long post-progression survival; and with several consecutive therapeutic options available post-progression. Ethical committees, caregivers and patients often demand cross-over-designs diluting the treatment-effect on overall survival. Regulatory authorities require evaluation of morbidity-related study endpoints including survival of patients without their disease getting worse (i.e., progression-free survival). Also, progression requires treatment-changes, another strong indicator for its relevance to patients. Based on specific guidelines and clinical trial programs that were developed to be consistent with regulatory guidance, endpoints in oncology are thoroughly evaluated in terms of their patient-relevance. This extensive knowledge and experience should be fully acknowledged during EBA when assessing the patient-relevant benefit of innovative medicines in oncology. JEL CODES: D61; H51; I18. Springer 2014-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3901346/ /pubmed/24460706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-4-2 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dabisch et al.; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Dabisch, Inna
Dethling, Jürgen
Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos
Drechsler, Melanie
Kalanovic, Daniel
Kaskel, Peter
Langer, Frank
Ruof, Jörg
Ruppert, Thorsten
Wirth, Daniel
Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany
title Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany
title_full Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany
title_fullStr Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany
title_full_unstemmed Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany
title_short Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany
title_sort patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in germany
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460706
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-4-2
work_keys_str_mv AT dabischinna patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany
AT dethlingjurgen patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany
AT dintsioscharalabosmarkos patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany
AT drechslermelanie patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany
AT kalanovicdaniel patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany
AT kaskelpeter patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany
AT langerfrank patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany
AT ruofjorg patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany
AT ruppertthorsten patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany
AT wirthdaniel patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany