Cargando…
Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany
The German AMNOG healthcare reform includes a mandatory early-benefit-assessment (EBA) at launch. As per German social code, EBA is based on registration trials and includes evaluation of the patient-relevant effect of the new medicines compared to an appropriate comparator as defined by the Federal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-4-2 |
_version_ | 1782300841829466112 |
---|---|
author | Dabisch, Inna Dethling, Jürgen Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos Drechsler, Melanie Kalanovic, Daniel Kaskel, Peter Langer, Frank Ruof, Jörg Ruppert, Thorsten Wirth, Daniel |
author_facet | Dabisch, Inna Dethling, Jürgen Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos Drechsler, Melanie Kalanovic, Daniel Kaskel, Peter Langer, Frank Ruof, Jörg Ruppert, Thorsten Wirth, Daniel |
author_sort | Dabisch, Inna |
collection | PubMed |
description | The German AMNOG healthcare reform includes a mandatory early-benefit-assessment (EBA) at launch. As per German social code, EBA is based on registration trials and includes evaluation of the patient-relevant effect of the new medicines compared to an appropriate comparator as defined by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Current EBA decisions released have unveiled issues regarding the acceptance of some patient-relevant endpoints as G-BA and IQWiG are grading the endpoints, focusing on overall survival as the preferred endpoint in oncology. A taskforce of experienced German outcomes research, medical, health-technology assessment and biostatistics researchers in industry was appointed. After agreement on core assumptions, a draft position was prepared. Input on iterative versions was solicited from a panel of reviewers from industry and external stakeholders. Distinctive features of registration trials in oncology need to be considered when these studies form basis for EBA, especially in cancer-indications with long post-progression survival; and with several consecutive therapeutic options available post-progression. Ethical committees, caregivers and patients often demand cross-over-designs diluting the treatment-effect on overall survival. Regulatory authorities require evaluation of morbidity-related study endpoints including survival of patients without their disease getting worse (i.e., progression-free survival). Also, progression requires treatment-changes, another strong indicator for its relevance to patients. Based on specific guidelines and clinical trial programs that were developed to be consistent with regulatory guidance, endpoints in oncology are thoroughly evaluated in terms of their patient-relevance. This extensive knowledge and experience should be fully acknowledged during EBA when assessing the patient-relevant benefit of innovative medicines in oncology. JEL CODES: D61; H51; I18. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3901346 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39013462014-02-06 Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany Dabisch, Inna Dethling, Jürgen Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos Drechsler, Melanie Kalanovic, Daniel Kaskel, Peter Langer, Frank Ruof, Jörg Ruppert, Thorsten Wirth, Daniel Health Econ Rev Review The German AMNOG healthcare reform includes a mandatory early-benefit-assessment (EBA) at launch. As per German social code, EBA is based on registration trials and includes evaluation of the patient-relevant effect of the new medicines compared to an appropriate comparator as defined by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA). Current EBA decisions released have unveiled issues regarding the acceptance of some patient-relevant endpoints as G-BA and IQWiG are grading the endpoints, focusing on overall survival as the preferred endpoint in oncology. A taskforce of experienced German outcomes research, medical, health-technology assessment and biostatistics researchers in industry was appointed. After agreement on core assumptions, a draft position was prepared. Input on iterative versions was solicited from a panel of reviewers from industry and external stakeholders. Distinctive features of registration trials in oncology need to be considered when these studies form basis for EBA, especially in cancer-indications with long post-progression survival; and with several consecutive therapeutic options available post-progression. Ethical committees, caregivers and patients often demand cross-over-designs diluting the treatment-effect on overall survival. Regulatory authorities require evaluation of morbidity-related study endpoints including survival of patients without their disease getting worse (i.e., progression-free survival). Also, progression requires treatment-changes, another strong indicator for its relevance to patients. Based on specific guidelines and clinical trial programs that were developed to be consistent with regulatory guidance, endpoints in oncology are thoroughly evaluated in terms of their patient-relevance. This extensive knowledge and experience should be fully acknowledged during EBA when assessing the patient-relevant benefit of innovative medicines in oncology. JEL CODES: D61; H51; I18. Springer 2014-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3901346/ /pubmed/24460706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-4-2 Text en Copyright © 2014 Dabisch et al.; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Dabisch, Inna Dethling, Jürgen Dintsios, Charalabos-Markos Drechsler, Melanie Kalanovic, Daniel Kaskel, Peter Langer, Frank Ruof, Jörg Ruppert, Thorsten Wirth, Daniel Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany |
title | Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany |
title_full | Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany |
title_fullStr | Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany |
title_short | Patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in Germany |
title_sort | patient relevant endpoints in oncology: current issues in the context of early benefit assessment in germany |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901346/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460706 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-1991-4-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dabischinna patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany AT dethlingjurgen patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany AT dintsioscharalabosmarkos patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany AT drechslermelanie patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany AT kalanovicdaniel patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany AT kaskelpeter patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany AT langerfrank patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany AT ruofjorg patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany AT ruppertthorsten patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany AT wirthdaniel patientrelevantendpointsinoncologycurrentissuesinthecontextofearlybenefitassessmentingermany |