Cargando…

Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular anesthetic drug injections are claimed to confirm the localization of the pain in order to treat the pain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a positive effect of injection could be indicative for a successful outcome of future arthrodesis. METHODS: 74 P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stegeman, Mark, van Ginneken, Berbke To Josephine, Boetes, Bastiaan, Tuinhout, Mirjam, Louwerens, Jan Willem Karel, Swierstra, Bartele Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24405758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-11
_version_ 1782300842971365376
author Stegeman, Mark
van Ginneken, Berbke To Josephine
Boetes, Bastiaan
Tuinhout, Mirjam
Louwerens, Jan Willem Karel
Swierstra, Bartele Alexander
author_facet Stegeman, Mark
van Ginneken, Berbke To Josephine
Boetes, Bastiaan
Tuinhout, Mirjam
Louwerens, Jan Willem Karel
Swierstra, Bartele Alexander
author_sort Stegeman, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intra-articular anesthetic drug injections are claimed to confirm the localization of the pain in order to treat the pain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a positive effect of injection could be indicative for a successful outcome of future arthrodesis. METHODS: 74 Patients underwent fluoroscopically guided and contrast confirmed anesthetic joint injections for diagnostic reasons. Before and after injection, pain was measured by use of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in rest and after exercise. Pain reduction was expressed as delta VAS (dVAS). Also, the Foot Function Index (FFI) was obtained. Based on the effect of the diagnostic injection and various clinical factors, patients were advised a conservative treatment (conservative group, n = 34) or an arthrodesis of the affected joint (operative group, n = 40). After a median follow-up period of 3.6 years (range 2.1 to 4.3 years) patients were again invited to complete the FFI and VAS in rest and after exercise. For data-analysis purposes the patients were assigned to four different groups, based on the result of injection and the occurrence of surgery. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Mann Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Based on the analysis of the four groups we found that surgery, irrespective of the presence of pain reduction after injection, was related to improvement of VAS and FFI. Patients with conservative treatment always showed worse VAS and FFI scores, even when previous injections showed an improvement of VAS. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopically-guided anesthetic injections of the supposed painful foot-ankle joint seem not to be indicative for a successful outcome of an arthrodesis of the affected joint. However, the sole occurrence of surgery shows a significant difference in VAS and FFI scores, where conservative treatment does not. The local hospital review board granted permission for this study. Ethical approval was not required for this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3901374
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39013742014-01-25 Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis? Stegeman, Mark van Ginneken, Berbke To Josephine Boetes, Bastiaan Tuinhout, Mirjam Louwerens, Jan Willem Karel Swierstra, Bartele Alexander BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Intra-articular anesthetic drug injections are claimed to confirm the localization of the pain in order to treat the pain. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether a positive effect of injection could be indicative for a successful outcome of future arthrodesis. METHODS: 74 Patients underwent fluoroscopically guided and contrast confirmed anesthetic joint injections for diagnostic reasons. Before and after injection, pain was measured by use of the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in rest and after exercise. Pain reduction was expressed as delta VAS (dVAS). Also, the Foot Function Index (FFI) was obtained. Based on the effect of the diagnostic injection and various clinical factors, patients were advised a conservative treatment (conservative group, n = 34) or an arthrodesis of the affected joint (operative group, n = 40). After a median follow-up period of 3.6 years (range 2.1 to 4.3 years) patients were again invited to complete the FFI and VAS in rest and after exercise. For data-analysis purposes the patients were assigned to four different groups, based on the result of injection and the occurrence of surgery. Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Mann Whitney U tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Based on the analysis of the four groups we found that surgery, irrespective of the presence of pain reduction after injection, was related to improvement of VAS and FFI. Patients with conservative treatment always showed worse VAS and FFI scores, even when previous injections showed an improvement of VAS. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoroscopically-guided anesthetic injections of the supposed painful foot-ankle joint seem not to be indicative for a successful outcome of an arthrodesis of the affected joint. However, the sole occurrence of surgery shows a significant difference in VAS and FFI scores, where conservative treatment does not. The local hospital review board granted permission for this study. Ethical approval was not required for this study. BioMed Central 2014-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3901374/ /pubmed/24405758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-11 Text en Copyright © 2014 Stegeman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stegeman, Mark
van Ginneken, Berbke To Josephine
Boetes, Bastiaan
Tuinhout, Mirjam
Louwerens, Jan Willem Karel
Swierstra, Bartele Alexander
Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?
title Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?
title_full Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?
title_fullStr Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?
title_full_unstemmed Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?
title_short Can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?
title_sort can diagnostic injections predict the outcome in foot and ankle arthrodesis?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901374/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24405758
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-15-11
work_keys_str_mv AT stegemanmark candiagnosticinjectionspredicttheoutcomeinfootandanklearthrodesis
AT vanginnekenberbketojosephine candiagnosticinjectionspredicttheoutcomeinfootandanklearthrodesis
AT boetesbastiaan candiagnosticinjectionspredicttheoutcomeinfootandanklearthrodesis
AT tuinhoutmirjam candiagnosticinjectionspredicttheoutcomeinfootandanklearthrodesis
AT louwerensjanwillemkarel candiagnosticinjectionspredicttheoutcomeinfootandanklearthrodesis
AT swierstrabartelealexander candiagnosticinjectionspredicttheoutcomeinfootandanklearthrodesis