Cargando…

Computer-Assisted Interpretation of the EEG Background Pattern: A Clinical Evaluation

OBJECTIVE: Interpretation of the EEG background pattern in routine recordings is an important part of clinical reviews. We evaluated the feasibility of an automated analysis system to assist reviewers with evaluation of the general properties in the EEG background pattern. METHODS: Quantitative EEG...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lodder, Shaun S., Askamp, Jessica, van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24475064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085966
_version_ 1782300880466345984
author Lodder, Shaun S.
Askamp, Jessica
van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
author_facet Lodder, Shaun S.
Askamp, Jessica
van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
author_sort Lodder, Shaun S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Interpretation of the EEG background pattern in routine recordings is an important part of clinical reviews. We evaluated the feasibility of an automated analysis system to assist reviewers with evaluation of the general properties in the EEG background pattern. METHODS: Quantitative EEG methods were used to describe the following five background properties: posterior dominant rhythm frequency and reactivity, anterior-posterior gradients, presence of diffuse slow-wave activity and asymmetry. Software running the quantitative methods were given to ten experienced electroencephalographers together with 45 routine EEG recordings and computer-generated reports. Participants were asked to review the EEGs by visual analysis first, and afterwards to compare their findings with the generated reports and correct mistakes made by the system. Corrected reports were returned for comparison. RESULTS: Using a gold-standard derived from the consensus of reviewers, inter-rater agreement was calculated for all reviewers and for automated interpretation. Automated interpretation together with most participants showed high (kappa > 0.6) agreement with the gold standard. In some cases, automated analysis showed higher agreement with the gold standard than participants. When asked in a questionnaire after the study, all participants considered computer-assisted interpretation to be useful for every day use in routine reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Automated interpretation methods proved to be accurate and were considered to be useful by all participants. SIGNIFICANCE: Computer-assisted interpretation of the EEG background pattern can bring consistency to reviewing and improve efficiency and inter-rater agreement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3901663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39016632014-01-28 Computer-Assisted Interpretation of the EEG Background Pattern: A Clinical Evaluation Lodder, Shaun S. Askamp, Jessica van Putten, Michel J. A. M. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: Interpretation of the EEG background pattern in routine recordings is an important part of clinical reviews. We evaluated the feasibility of an automated analysis system to assist reviewers with evaluation of the general properties in the EEG background pattern. METHODS: Quantitative EEG methods were used to describe the following five background properties: posterior dominant rhythm frequency and reactivity, anterior-posterior gradients, presence of diffuse slow-wave activity and asymmetry. Software running the quantitative methods were given to ten experienced electroencephalographers together with 45 routine EEG recordings and computer-generated reports. Participants were asked to review the EEGs by visual analysis first, and afterwards to compare their findings with the generated reports and correct mistakes made by the system. Corrected reports were returned for comparison. RESULTS: Using a gold-standard derived from the consensus of reviewers, inter-rater agreement was calculated for all reviewers and for automated interpretation. Automated interpretation together with most participants showed high (kappa > 0.6) agreement with the gold standard. In some cases, automated analysis showed higher agreement with the gold standard than participants. When asked in a questionnaire after the study, all participants considered computer-assisted interpretation to be useful for every day use in routine reviews. CONCLUSIONS: Automated interpretation methods proved to be accurate and were considered to be useful by all participants. SIGNIFICANCE: Computer-assisted interpretation of the EEG background pattern can bring consistency to reviewing and improve efficiency and inter-rater agreement. Public Library of Science 2014-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3901663/ /pubmed/24475064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085966 Text en © 2014 Lodder et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lodder, Shaun S.
Askamp, Jessica
van Putten, Michel J. A. M.
Computer-Assisted Interpretation of the EEG Background Pattern: A Clinical Evaluation
title Computer-Assisted Interpretation of the EEG Background Pattern: A Clinical Evaluation
title_full Computer-Assisted Interpretation of the EEG Background Pattern: A Clinical Evaluation
title_fullStr Computer-Assisted Interpretation of the EEG Background Pattern: A Clinical Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Computer-Assisted Interpretation of the EEG Background Pattern: A Clinical Evaluation
title_short Computer-Assisted Interpretation of the EEG Background Pattern: A Clinical Evaluation
title_sort computer-assisted interpretation of the eeg background pattern: a clinical evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24475064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085966
work_keys_str_mv AT loddershauns computerassistedinterpretationoftheeegbackgroundpatternaclinicalevaluation
AT askampjessica computerassistedinterpretationoftheeegbackgroundpatternaclinicalevaluation
AT vanputtenmicheljam computerassistedinterpretationoftheeegbackgroundpatternaclinicalevaluation