Cargando…
Epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity
Fertility is a couple concept that has been measured since the beginning of demography, and male fecundity (his biological capacity to reproduce) is a component of the fertility rate. Unfortunately, we have no way of measuring the male component directly, although several indirect markers can be use...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369129 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122198 |
_version_ | 1782300916214398976 |
---|---|
author | Olsen, Jørn Ramlau-Hansen, Cecilia Høst |
author_facet | Olsen, Jørn Ramlau-Hansen, Cecilia Høst |
author_sort | Olsen, Jørn |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fertility is a couple concept that has been measured since the beginning of demography, and male fecundity (his biological capacity to reproduce) is a component of the fertility rate. Unfortunately, we have no way of measuring the male component directly, although several indirect markers can be used. Population registers can be used to monitor the proportion of childless couples, couples who receive donor semen, trends in dizygotic twinning, and infertility diagnoses. Studies using time-to-pregnancy (TTP) may identify couple subfecundity, and TTP data will correlate with sperm quality and quantity as well as sexual activity and a number of other conditions. Having exposure data available for couples with a fecund female partner would make TTP studies of interest in identifying exposures that may affect male fecundity. Biological indicators such as sperm quality and quantity isolate the male component of fertility, and semen data therefore remain an important source of information for research. Unfortunately, often over half of those invited to provide a sperm sample will refuse, and the study is then subject to a selection that may introduce bias. Because the most important time windows for exposures that impair semen production could be early fetal life, puberty, and the time of ejaculation; longitudinal data over decades of time are required. The ongoing monitoring of semen quality and quantity should continue, and surveys monitoring fertility and waiting TTP should also be designed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3901876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39018762014-03-03 Epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity Olsen, Jørn Ramlau-Hansen, Cecilia Høst Asian J Androl Invited Review Fertility is a couple concept that has been measured since the beginning of demography, and male fecundity (his biological capacity to reproduce) is a component of the fertility rate. Unfortunately, we have no way of measuring the male component directly, although several indirect markers can be used. Population registers can be used to monitor the proportion of childless couples, couples who receive donor semen, trends in dizygotic twinning, and infertility diagnoses. Studies using time-to-pregnancy (TTP) may identify couple subfecundity, and TTP data will correlate with sperm quality and quantity as well as sexual activity and a number of other conditions. Having exposure data available for couples with a fecund female partner would make TTP studies of interest in identifying exposures that may affect male fecundity. Biological indicators such as sperm quality and quantity isolate the male component of fertility, and semen data therefore remain an important source of information for research. Unfortunately, often over half of those invited to provide a sperm sample will refuse, and the study is then subject to a selection that may introduce bias. Because the most important time windows for exposures that impair semen production could be early fetal life, puberty, and the time of ejaculation; longitudinal data over decades of time are required. The ongoing monitoring of semen quality and quantity should continue, and surveys monitoring fertility and waiting TTP should also be designed. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 2013-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3901876/ /pubmed/24369129 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122198 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Andrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Olsen, Jørn Ramlau-Hansen, Cecilia Høst Epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity |
title | Epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity |
title_full | Epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity |
title_fullStr | Epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity |
title_full_unstemmed | Epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity |
title_short | Epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity |
title_sort | epidemiologic methods for investigating male fecundity |
topic | Invited Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369129 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122198 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT olsenjørn epidemiologicmethodsforinvestigatingmalefecundity AT ramlauhansenceciliahøst epidemiologicmethodsforinvestigatingmalefecundity |