Cargando…

External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND: For patients hospitalised due to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), mortality risk is usually estimated with prognostic scores such as CRB-65 or CURB-65. For elderly patients, a new score referred to as CURSI has been proposed which uses shock index (SI) instead of the blood pressure (B...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nüllmann, Harald, Pflug, Marc Andre, Wesemann, Thomas, Heppner, Hans-Jürgen, Pientka, Ludger, Thiem, Ulrich
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-39
_version_ 1782300919902240768
author Nüllmann, Harald
Pflug, Marc Andre
Wesemann, Thomas
Heppner, Hans-Jürgen
Pientka, Ludger
Thiem, Ulrich
author_facet Nüllmann, Harald
Pflug, Marc Andre
Wesemann, Thomas
Heppner, Hans-Jürgen
Pientka, Ludger
Thiem, Ulrich
author_sort Nüllmann, Harald
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For patients hospitalised due to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), mortality risk is usually estimated with prognostic scores such as CRB-65 or CURB-65. For elderly patients, a new score referred to as CURSI has been proposed which uses shock index (SI) instead of the blood pressure (B) and age (65) criteria. The new score has not been externally validated to date. METHODS: We used data from a hospital-based CAP registry to compare the ability of CURSI, CURB-65 and CRB-65 to predict mortality at day 30 after hospital admission. Patients were stratified by score points as well as score-point-based risk categories, and mortality for each group was assessed. To compare test performance, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and the areas under the curve (AUROC) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We analysed 553 inpatients (45% females, median age 78 years) hospitalised between 2005 and 2009 for CAP. Overall, mortality at day 30 was 11% (59/553). The study sample was characterised by advanced comorbidity (chronic heart failure: 22%, chronic kidney failure: 27%) and functional impairment (nursing home residency: 26%, dementia: 31%). All risk scores were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. The AUROC values with 95% CI using score points for risk prediction were as follows: 0.63 [0.56-0.71] for CRB-65, 0.68 [0.61-0.75] for CURB-65 and 0.68 [0.61-0.75] for CURSI. The CURSI-defined low-risk group (0 or 1 score point) had a higher mortality (8%) than the low-risk groups defined by CURB-65 and CRB-65 (4% and 3%, respectively). Lowering the cut-off for the CURSI-defined low-risk group (0 point only) would lower the mortality to 4%, making it comparable to the CURB-65-defined low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the CURSI-defined low-risk group had a higher 30-day mortality than the low-risk groups defined by CURB-65 and CRB-65. Lowering the cut-off value for the CURSI low-risk group would result in a mortality comparable to the CURB-65-defined low risk group. Even then, however, CURSI does not perform better than the established risk scores.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3901892
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39018922014-01-26 External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia Nüllmann, Harald Pflug, Marc Andre Wesemann, Thomas Heppner, Hans-Jürgen Pientka, Ludger Thiem, Ulrich BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: For patients hospitalised due to community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), mortality risk is usually estimated with prognostic scores such as CRB-65 or CURB-65. For elderly patients, a new score referred to as CURSI has been proposed which uses shock index (SI) instead of the blood pressure (B) and age (65) criteria. The new score has not been externally validated to date. METHODS: We used data from a hospital-based CAP registry to compare the ability of CURSI, CURB-65 and CRB-65 to predict mortality at day 30 after hospital admission. Patients were stratified by score points as well as score-point-based risk categories, and mortality for each group was assessed. To compare test performance, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and the areas under the curve (AUROC) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We analysed 553 inpatients (45% females, median age 78 years) hospitalised between 2005 and 2009 for CAP. Overall, mortality at day 30 was 11% (59/553). The study sample was characterised by advanced comorbidity (chronic heart failure: 22%, chronic kidney failure: 27%) and functional impairment (nursing home residency: 26%, dementia: 31%). All risk scores were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. The AUROC values with 95% CI using score points for risk prediction were as follows: 0.63 [0.56-0.71] for CRB-65, 0.68 [0.61-0.75] for CURB-65 and 0.68 [0.61-0.75] for CURSI. The CURSI-defined low-risk group (0 or 1 score point) had a higher mortality (8%) than the low-risk groups defined by CURB-65 and CRB-65 (4% and 3%, respectively). Lowering the cut-off for the CURSI-defined low-risk group (0 point only) would lower the mortality to 4%, making it comparable to the CURB-65-defined low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the CURSI-defined low-risk group had a higher 30-day mortality than the low-risk groups defined by CURB-65 and CRB-65. Lowering the cut-off value for the CURSI low-risk group would result in a mortality comparable to the CURB-65-defined low risk group. Even then, however, CURSI does not perform better than the established risk scores. BioMed Central 2014-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3901892/ /pubmed/24447823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-39 Text en Copyright © 2014 Nüllmann et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nüllmann, Harald
Pflug, Marc Andre
Wesemann, Thomas
Heppner, Hans-Jürgen
Pientka, Ludger
Thiem, Ulrich
External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia
title External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia
title_full External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia
title_fullStr External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia
title_full_unstemmed External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia
title_short External validation of the CURSI criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia
title_sort external validation of the cursi criteria (confusion, urea, respiratory rate and shock index) in adults hospitalised for community-acquired pneumonia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901892/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24447823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-39
work_keys_str_mv AT nullmannharald externalvalidationofthecursicriteriaconfusionurearespiratoryrateandshockindexinadultshospitalisedforcommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT pflugmarcandre externalvalidationofthecursicriteriaconfusionurearespiratoryrateandshockindexinadultshospitalisedforcommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT wesemannthomas externalvalidationofthecursicriteriaconfusionurearespiratoryrateandshockindexinadultshospitalisedforcommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT heppnerhansjurgen externalvalidationofthecursicriteriaconfusionurearespiratoryrateandshockindexinadultshospitalisedforcommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT pientkaludger externalvalidationofthecursicriteriaconfusionurearespiratoryrateandshockindexinadultshospitalisedforcommunityacquiredpneumonia
AT thiemulrich externalvalidationofthecursicriteriaconfusionurearespiratoryrateandshockindexinadultshospitalisedforcommunityacquiredpneumonia