Cargando…
Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA
Objective. To examine measurement of body composition by ultrasound compared with a reference technique:dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We evaluated the accuracy of a portable ultrasound-based device in estimating total body fat mass with those assessed by DXA in adult. Methods. Body fat mas...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24575315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/462394 |
_version_ | 1782300933520097280 |
---|---|
author | Pineau, Jean-Claude Lalys, Loïc Pellegrini, Massimo Battistini, Nino Carlo |
author_facet | Pineau, Jean-Claude Lalys, Loïc Pellegrini, Massimo Battistini, Nino Carlo |
author_sort | Pineau, Jean-Claude |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. To examine measurement of body composition by ultrasound compared with a reference technique:dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We evaluated the accuracy of a portable ultrasound-based device in estimating total body fat mass with those assessed by DXA in adult. Methods. Body fat mass has been estimated using a portable ultrasound-based device in comparison with a contemporary reference DXA apparatus: the Hologic Discovery A. Anthropometric data has been assessed in order to maximize the output of the software associated with the ultrasound-based device. A cross-validation between ultrasound technique (US) and DXA was developed in this study. Total body fat mass estimated by ultrasound was compared with this DXA model in a sample of 83 women and 41 men. Results. Ultrasound technique (US) of body fat (BF) was better correlated with DXA in both women (r (2) = 0.97, P < 0.01) and men (r (2) = 0.92, P < 0.01) with standard errors of estimates (SEE) being 2.1 kg and 2.2 kg, respectively. Conclusion. The use of a portable device based on a US produced a very accurate BF estimate in relation to DXA reference technique. As DXA absorptiometry techniques are not interchangeable, the use of our ultrasound-based device needs to be recalibrated on a more contemporary DXA. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3901967 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39019672014-02-26 Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA Pineau, Jean-Claude Lalys, Loïc Pellegrini, Massimo Battistini, Nino Carlo ISRN Obes Clinical Study Objective. To examine measurement of body composition by ultrasound compared with a reference technique:dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We evaluated the accuracy of a portable ultrasound-based device in estimating total body fat mass with those assessed by DXA in adult. Methods. Body fat mass has been estimated using a portable ultrasound-based device in comparison with a contemporary reference DXA apparatus: the Hologic Discovery A. Anthropometric data has been assessed in order to maximize the output of the software associated with the ultrasound-based device. A cross-validation between ultrasound technique (US) and DXA was developed in this study. Total body fat mass estimated by ultrasound was compared with this DXA model in a sample of 83 women and 41 men. Results. Ultrasound technique (US) of body fat (BF) was better correlated with DXA in both women (r (2) = 0.97, P < 0.01) and men (r (2) = 0.92, P < 0.01) with standard errors of estimates (SEE) being 2.1 kg and 2.2 kg, respectively. Conclusion. The use of a portable device based on a US produced a very accurate BF estimate in relation to DXA reference technique. As DXA absorptiometry techniques are not interchangeable, the use of our ultrasound-based device needs to be recalibrated on a more contemporary DXA. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3901967/ /pubmed/24575315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/462394 Text en Copyright © 2013 Jean-Claude Pineau et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Pineau, Jean-Claude Lalys, Loïc Pellegrini, Massimo Battistini, Nino Carlo Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA |
title | Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA |
title_full | Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA |
title_fullStr | Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA |
title_full_unstemmed | Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA |
title_short | Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA |
title_sort | body fat mass assessment: a comparison between an ultrasound-based device and a discovery a model of dxa |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901967/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24575315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/462394 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pineaujeanclaude bodyfatmassassessmentacomparisonbetweenanultrasoundbaseddeviceandadiscoveryamodelofdxa AT lalysloic bodyfatmassassessmentacomparisonbetweenanultrasoundbaseddeviceandadiscoveryamodelofdxa AT pellegrinimassimo bodyfatmassassessmentacomparisonbetweenanultrasoundbaseddeviceandadiscoveryamodelofdxa AT battistinininocarlo bodyfatmassassessmentacomparisonbetweenanultrasoundbaseddeviceandadiscoveryamodelofdxa |