Cargando…

Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA

Objective. To examine measurement of body composition by ultrasound compared with a reference technique:dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We evaluated the accuracy of a portable ultrasound-based device in estimating total body fat mass with those assessed by DXA in adult. Methods. Body fat mas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pineau, Jean-Claude, Lalys, Loïc, Pellegrini, Massimo, Battistini, Nino Carlo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24575315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/462394
_version_ 1782300933520097280
author Pineau, Jean-Claude
Lalys, Loïc
Pellegrini, Massimo
Battistini, Nino Carlo
author_facet Pineau, Jean-Claude
Lalys, Loïc
Pellegrini, Massimo
Battistini, Nino Carlo
author_sort Pineau, Jean-Claude
collection PubMed
description Objective. To examine measurement of body composition by ultrasound compared with a reference technique:dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We evaluated the accuracy of a portable ultrasound-based device in estimating total body fat mass with those assessed by DXA in adult. Methods. Body fat mass has been estimated using a portable ultrasound-based device in comparison with a contemporary reference DXA apparatus: the Hologic Discovery A. Anthropometric data has been assessed in order to maximize the output of the software associated with the ultrasound-based device. A cross-validation between ultrasound technique (US) and DXA was developed in this study. Total body fat mass estimated by ultrasound was compared with this DXA model in a sample of 83 women and 41 men. Results. Ultrasound technique (US) of body fat (BF) was better correlated with DXA in both women (r (2) = 0.97, P < 0.01) and men (r (2) = 0.92, P < 0.01) with standard errors of estimates (SEE) being 2.1 kg and 2.2 kg, respectively. Conclusion. The use of a portable device based on a US produced a very accurate BF estimate in relation to DXA reference technique. As DXA absorptiometry techniques are not interchangeable, the use of our ultrasound-based device needs to be recalibrated on a more contemporary DXA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3901967
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39019672014-02-26 Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA Pineau, Jean-Claude Lalys, Loïc Pellegrini, Massimo Battistini, Nino Carlo ISRN Obes Clinical Study Objective. To examine measurement of body composition by ultrasound compared with a reference technique:dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). We evaluated the accuracy of a portable ultrasound-based device in estimating total body fat mass with those assessed by DXA in adult. Methods. Body fat mass has been estimated using a portable ultrasound-based device in comparison with a contemporary reference DXA apparatus: the Hologic Discovery A. Anthropometric data has been assessed in order to maximize the output of the software associated with the ultrasound-based device. A cross-validation between ultrasound technique (US) and DXA was developed in this study. Total body fat mass estimated by ultrasound was compared with this DXA model in a sample of 83 women and 41 men. Results. Ultrasound technique (US) of body fat (BF) was better correlated with DXA in both women (r (2) = 0.97, P < 0.01) and men (r (2) = 0.92, P < 0.01) with standard errors of estimates (SEE) being 2.1 kg and 2.2 kg, respectively. Conclusion. The use of a portable device based on a US produced a very accurate BF estimate in relation to DXA reference technique. As DXA absorptiometry techniques are not interchangeable, the use of our ultrasound-based device needs to be recalibrated on a more contemporary DXA. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2013-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3901967/ /pubmed/24575315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/462394 Text en Copyright © 2013 Jean-Claude Pineau et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Pineau, Jean-Claude
Lalys, Loïc
Pellegrini, Massimo
Battistini, Nino Carlo
Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA
title Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA
title_full Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA
title_fullStr Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA
title_full_unstemmed Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA
title_short Body Fat Mass Assessment: A Comparison between an Ultrasound-Based Device and a Discovery A Model of DXA
title_sort body fat mass assessment: a comparison between an ultrasound-based device and a discovery a model of dxa
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3901967/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24575315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/462394
work_keys_str_mv AT pineaujeanclaude bodyfatmassassessmentacomparisonbetweenanultrasoundbaseddeviceandadiscoveryamodelofdxa
AT lalysloic bodyfatmassassessmentacomparisonbetweenanultrasoundbaseddeviceandadiscoveryamodelofdxa
AT pellegrinimassimo bodyfatmassassessmentacomparisonbetweenanultrasoundbaseddeviceandadiscoveryamodelofdxa
AT battistinininocarlo bodyfatmassassessmentacomparisonbetweenanultrasoundbaseddeviceandadiscoveryamodelofdxa