Cargando…

In your eyes only: deficits in executive functioning after frontal TMS reflect in eye movements

This study investigated the roles of the right and left dorsolateral prefrontal (rDLPFC, lDLPFC) and the medial frontal cortex (MFC) in executive functioning using a theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approach. Healthy subjects solved two visual search tasks: a number search task wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lüthi, Mathias, Henke, Katharina, Gutbrod, Klemens, Nyffeler, Thomas, Chaves, Silvia, Müri, René M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24478654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00007
_version_ 1782300960421314560
author Lüthi, Mathias
Henke, Katharina
Gutbrod, Klemens
Nyffeler, Thomas
Chaves, Silvia
Müri, René M.
author_facet Lüthi, Mathias
Henke, Katharina
Gutbrod, Klemens
Nyffeler, Thomas
Chaves, Silvia
Müri, René M.
author_sort Lüthi, Mathias
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the roles of the right and left dorsolateral prefrontal (rDLPFC, lDLPFC) and the medial frontal cortex (MFC) in executive functioning using a theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approach. Healthy subjects solved two visual search tasks: a number search task with low cognitive demands, and a number and letter search task with high cognitive demands. To observe how subjects solved the tasks, we assessed their behavior with and without TMS using eye movements when subjects were confronted with specific executive demands. To observe executive functions, we were particularly interested in TMS-induced changes in visual exploration strategies found to be associated with good or bad performance in a control condition without TMS stimulation. TMS left processing time unchanged in both tasks. Inhibition of the rDLPFC resulted in a decrease in anticipatory fixations in the number search task, i.e., a decrease in a good strategy in this low demand task. This was paired with a decrease in stimulus fixations. Together, these results point to a role of the rDLPFC in planning and response selection. Inhibition of the lDLPFC and the MFC resulted in an increase in anticipatory fixations in the number and letter search task, i.e., an increase in the application of a good strategy in this task. We interpret these results as a compensatory strategy to account for TMS-induced deficits in attentional switching when faced with high switching demands. After inhibition of the lDLPFC, an increase in regressive fixations was found in the number and letter search task. In the context of high working memory demands, this strategy appears to support TMS-induced working memory deficits. Combining an experimental TMS approach with the recording of eye movements proved sensitive to discrete decrements of executive functions and allows pinpointing the functional organization of the frontal lobes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3902210
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39022102014-01-29 In your eyes only: deficits in executive functioning after frontal TMS reflect in eye movements Lüthi, Mathias Henke, Katharina Gutbrod, Klemens Nyffeler, Thomas Chaves, Silvia Müri, René M. Front Behav Neurosci Neuroscience This study investigated the roles of the right and left dorsolateral prefrontal (rDLPFC, lDLPFC) and the medial frontal cortex (MFC) in executive functioning using a theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) approach. Healthy subjects solved two visual search tasks: a number search task with low cognitive demands, and a number and letter search task with high cognitive demands. To observe how subjects solved the tasks, we assessed their behavior with and without TMS using eye movements when subjects were confronted with specific executive demands. To observe executive functions, we were particularly interested in TMS-induced changes in visual exploration strategies found to be associated with good or bad performance in a control condition without TMS stimulation. TMS left processing time unchanged in both tasks. Inhibition of the rDLPFC resulted in a decrease in anticipatory fixations in the number search task, i.e., a decrease in a good strategy in this low demand task. This was paired with a decrease in stimulus fixations. Together, these results point to a role of the rDLPFC in planning and response selection. Inhibition of the lDLPFC and the MFC resulted in an increase in anticipatory fixations in the number and letter search task, i.e., an increase in the application of a good strategy in this task. We interpret these results as a compensatory strategy to account for TMS-induced deficits in attentional switching when faced with high switching demands. After inhibition of the lDLPFC, an increase in regressive fixations was found in the number and letter search task. In the context of high working memory demands, this strategy appears to support TMS-induced working memory deficits. Combining an experimental TMS approach with the recording of eye movements proved sensitive to discrete decrements of executive functions and allows pinpointing the functional organization of the frontal lobes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3902210/ /pubmed/24478654 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00007 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lüthi, Henke, Gutbrod, Nyffeler, Chaves and Müri. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Lüthi, Mathias
Henke, Katharina
Gutbrod, Klemens
Nyffeler, Thomas
Chaves, Silvia
Müri, René M.
In your eyes only: deficits in executive functioning after frontal TMS reflect in eye movements
title In your eyes only: deficits in executive functioning after frontal TMS reflect in eye movements
title_full In your eyes only: deficits in executive functioning after frontal TMS reflect in eye movements
title_fullStr In your eyes only: deficits in executive functioning after frontal TMS reflect in eye movements
title_full_unstemmed In your eyes only: deficits in executive functioning after frontal TMS reflect in eye movements
title_short In your eyes only: deficits in executive functioning after frontal TMS reflect in eye movements
title_sort in your eyes only: deficits in executive functioning after frontal tms reflect in eye movements
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902210/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24478654
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00007
work_keys_str_mv AT luthimathias inyoureyesonlydeficitsinexecutivefunctioningafterfrontaltmsreflectineyemovements
AT henkekatharina inyoureyesonlydeficitsinexecutivefunctioningafterfrontaltmsreflectineyemovements
AT gutbrodklemens inyoureyesonlydeficitsinexecutivefunctioningafterfrontaltmsreflectineyemovements
AT nyffelerthomas inyoureyesonlydeficitsinexecutivefunctioningafterfrontaltmsreflectineyemovements
AT chavessilvia inyoureyesonlydeficitsinexecutivefunctioningafterfrontaltmsreflectineyemovements
AT murirenem inyoureyesonlydeficitsinexecutivefunctioningafterfrontaltmsreflectineyemovements