Cargando…

Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews

OBJECTIVE: Lean interventions aim to improve quality of healthcare by reducing waste and facilitate flow in work processes. There is conflicting evidence on the outcomes of lean thinking, with quantitative and qualitative studies often contradicting each other. We suggest that reviewing the literatu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andersen, Hege, Røvik, Kjell Arne, Ingebrigtsen, Tor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24435890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003873
_version_ 1782300968341209088
author Andersen, Hege
Røvik, Kjell Arne
Ingebrigtsen, Tor
author_facet Andersen, Hege
Røvik, Kjell Arne
Ingebrigtsen, Tor
author_sort Andersen, Hege
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Lean interventions aim to improve quality of healthcare by reducing waste and facilitate flow in work processes. There is conflicting evidence on the outcomes of lean thinking, with quantitative and qualitative studies often contradicting each other. We suggest that reviewing the literature within the approach of a new contextual framework can deepen our understanding of lean as a quality-improvement method. This article theorises the concept of context by establishing a two-dimensional conceptual framework acknowledging lean as complex social interventions, deployed in different organisational dimensions and domains. The specific aim of the study was to identify factors facilitating intended outcomes from lean interventions, and to understand when and how different facilitators contribute. DESIGN: A two-dimensional conceptual framework was developed by combining Shortell's Dimensions of capability with Walshes’ Domains of an intervention. We then conducted a systematic review of lean review articles concerning hospitals, published in the period 2000–2012. The identified lean facilitators were categorised according to the intervention domains and dimensions of capability provided by the framework. RESULTS: We provide a framework emphasising context by relating facilitators to domains and dimensions of capability. 23 factors enabling a successful lean intervention in hospitals were identified in the systematic review, where management and a supportive culture, training, accurate data, physicians and team involvement were most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of evidence, the two-dimensional framework, incorporating the context, may prove useful for future research on variation in outcomes from lean interventions. Findings from the review suggest that characteristics and local application of lean, in addition to strategic and cultural capability, should be given further attention in healthcare quality improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3902334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39023342014-01-27 Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews Andersen, Hege Røvik, Kjell Arne Ingebrigtsen, Tor BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: Lean interventions aim to improve quality of healthcare by reducing waste and facilitate flow in work processes. There is conflicting evidence on the outcomes of lean thinking, with quantitative and qualitative studies often contradicting each other. We suggest that reviewing the literature within the approach of a new contextual framework can deepen our understanding of lean as a quality-improvement method. This article theorises the concept of context by establishing a two-dimensional conceptual framework acknowledging lean as complex social interventions, deployed in different organisational dimensions and domains. The specific aim of the study was to identify factors facilitating intended outcomes from lean interventions, and to understand when and how different facilitators contribute. DESIGN: A two-dimensional conceptual framework was developed by combining Shortell's Dimensions of capability with Walshes’ Domains of an intervention. We then conducted a systematic review of lean review articles concerning hospitals, published in the period 2000–2012. The identified lean facilitators were categorised according to the intervention domains and dimensions of capability provided by the framework. RESULTS: We provide a framework emphasising context by relating facilitators to domains and dimensions of capability. 23 factors enabling a successful lean intervention in hospitals were identified in the systematic review, where management and a supportive culture, training, accurate data, physicians and team involvement were most frequent. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of evidence, the two-dimensional framework, incorporating the context, may prove useful for future research on variation in outcomes from lean interventions. Findings from the review suggest that characteristics and local application of lean, in addition to strategic and cultural capability, should be given further attention in healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-01-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3902334/ /pubmed/24435890 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003873 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Andersen, Hege
Røvik, Kjell Arne
Ingebrigtsen, Tor
Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews
title Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews
title_full Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews
title_fullStr Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews
title_full_unstemmed Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews
title_short Lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? A systematic review of reviews
title_sort lean thinking in hospitals: is there a cure for the absence of evidence? a systematic review of reviews
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24435890
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003873
work_keys_str_mv AT andersenhege leanthinkinginhospitalsisthereacurefortheabsenceofevidenceasystematicreviewofreviews
AT røvikkjellarne leanthinkinginhospitalsisthereacurefortheabsenceofevidenceasystematicreviewofreviews
AT ingebrigtsentor leanthinkinginhospitalsisthereacurefortheabsenceofevidenceasystematicreviewofreviews