Cargando…

Resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study

OBJECTIVES: To examine 10-year mortality and hospital use among individuals categorised as resilient and vulnerable to the impact of chronic pain. DESIGN: A cohort record linkage study. SETTING: Grampian, Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 5858 individuals from the Grampian Pain Cohort, established in 1996, we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elliott, Alison M, Burton, Christopher D, Hannaford, Philip C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24430878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003917
_version_ 1782300971543560192
author Elliott, Alison M
Burton, Christopher D
Hannaford, Philip C
author_facet Elliott, Alison M
Burton, Christopher D
Hannaford, Philip C
author_sort Elliott, Alison M
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine 10-year mortality and hospital use among individuals categorised as resilient and vulnerable to the impact of chronic pain. DESIGN: A cohort record linkage study. SETTING: Grampian, Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 5858 individuals from the Grampian Pain Cohort, established in 1996, were linked, by probability matching, with national routinely collected datasets. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HRs for subsequent 10-year mortality and ORs/incidence rate ratios for subsequent 10-year hospital use, each with adjustment for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: 36.5% of those with high pain intensity reported a low pain-related disability (categorised resilient) and 7.1% of those reporting low pain intensity reported a high pain-related disability (categorised vulnerable). Sex, age, housing, employment and long-term limiting illness were independently associated with being vulnerable or resilient. After adjustment for these variables, individuals in the resilient group were 25% less likely to die within 10 years of the survey compared with non-resilient individuals: HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.91 and vulnerable individuals were 45% more likely to die than non-vulnerable individuals: HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.11. Resilient individuals were less likely to have had an outpatient or day-case visit for anaesthetics: OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.79, but no other clinical specialities. Vulnerable individuals were significantly less likely to have had any outpatient or day-case visit (OR 0.43, 0.25 to 0.75); but more likely to have had a psychiatric visit (OR 1.96, 1.06 to 3.61). No significant differences in likelihood of any inpatient visits were found. CONCLUSIONS: Resilient individuals have a better 10-year survival than non-resilient individuals indicating that resilience is a phenomenon worth researching. Further research is needed to explore who is likely to become resilient, why and how, as well as to tease out the internal and external factors that influence resilience.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3902361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39023612014-01-27 Resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study Elliott, Alison M Burton, Christopher D Hannaford, Philip C BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVES: To examine 10-year mortality and hospital use among individuals categorised as resilient and vulnerable to the impact of chronic pain. DESIGN: A cohort record linkage study. SETTING: Grampian, Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 5858 individuals from the Grampian Pain Cohort, established in 1996, were linked, by probability matching, with national routinely collected datasets. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: HRs for subsequent 10-year mortality and ORs/incidence rate ratios for subsequent 10-year hospital use, each with adjustment for potential confounding variables. RESULTS: 36.5% of those with high pain intensity reported a low pain-related disability (categorised resilient) and 7.1% of those reporting low pain intensity reported a high pain-related disability (categorised vulnerable). Sex, age, housing, employment and long-term limiting illness were independently associated with being vulnerable or resilient. After adjustment for these variables, individuals in the resilient group were 25% less likely to die within 10 years of the survey compared with non-resilient individuals: HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.91 and vulnerable individuals were 45% more likely to die than non-vulnerable individuals: HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.11. Resilient individuals were less likely to have had an outpatient or day-case visit for anaesthetics: OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.79, but no other clinical specialities. Vulnerable individuals were significantly less likely to have had any outpatient or day-case visit (OR 0.43, 0.25 to 0.75); but more likely to have had a psychiatric visit (OR 1.96, 1.06 to 3.61). No significant differences in likelihood of any inpatient visits were found. CONCLUSIONS: Resilient individuals have a better 10-year survival than non-resilient individuals indicating that resilience is a phenomenon worth researching. Further research is needed to explore who is likely to become resilient, why and how, as well as to tease out the internal and external factors that influence resilience. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-01-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3902361/ /pubmed/24430878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003917 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Elliott, Alison M
Burton, Christopher D
Hannaford, Philip C
Resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study
title Resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study
title_full Resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study
title_fullStr Resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study
title_full_unstemmed Resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study
title_short Resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study
title_sort resilience does matter: evidence from a 10-year cohort record linkage study
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24430878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003917
work_keys_str_mv AT elliottalisonm resiliencedoesmatterevidencefroma10yearcohortrecordlinkagestudy
AT burtonchristopherd resiliencedoesmatterevidencefroma10yearcohortrecordlinkagestudy
AT hannafordphilipc resiliencedoesmatterevidencefroma10yearcohortrecordlinkagestudy