Cargando…

Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT) and determine which symptoms are relevant to results. DESIGN: Single-centre, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care centre, Tokyo, Japan. PARTICIPANTS: 82 consecutive outpatients presenting wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanei, Mika, Yokokawa, Hirohide, Murai, Kenji, Sakamoto, Rino, Amari, Yu, Boku, Soushin, Inui, Akihiro, Fujibayashi, Kazutoshi, Uehara, Yuki, Isonuma, Hiroshi, Kikuchi, Ken, Naito, Toshio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24384898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003885
_version_ 1782300996218650624
author Tanei, Mika
Yokokawa, Hirohide
Murai, Kenji
Sakamoto, Rino
Amari, Yu
Boku, Soushin
Inui, Akihiro
Fujibayashi, Kazutoshi
Uehara, Yuki
Isonuma, Hiroshi
Kikuchi, Ken
Naito, Toshio
author_facet Tanei, Mika
Yokokawa, Hirohide
Murai, Kenji
Sakamoto, Rino
Amari, Yu
Boku, Soushin
Inui, Akihiro
Fujibayashi, Kazutoshi
Uehara, Yuki
Isonuma, Hiroshi
Kikuchi, Ken
Naito, Toshio
author_sort Tanei, Mika
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT) and determine which symptoms are relevant to results. DESIGN: Single-centre, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care centre, Tokyo, Japan. PARTICIPANTS: 82 consecutive outpatients presenting with upper respiratory symptoms and fever ≥37°C at any time from symptom onset, between December 2010 and April 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of history and physical examination including age, sex, temperature, time of test from symptom onset, vaccination record and current symptoms (sore throat, arthralgia and/or myalgia, headache, chills, cough and/or throat phlegm, nasal discharge) were recorded. The RIADT and a fully automated respiratory virus nucleic acid test (Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus; VRV), the latter being the gold standard, were performed. Patients were divided into four groups: false negative (FN), RIADT− and VRV+; true positive (TP), RIADT+ and VRV+; true negative (TN), RIADT− and VRV−; and false positive, RIADT+ and VRV−. Groups were compared regarding age, sex, temperature, time of test from symptom onset, vaccination record and symptoms. RESULTS: RIADT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 72.9% (95% CI 61.5% to 84.2%), 91.3% (79.7% to 102.8%), 95.6% (89.5% to 101.6%) and 56.8% (40.8% to 72.7%), respectively. Time from symptom onset to test was shorter for the FN group than the TP group (p=0.009). No significant differences were detected for the other factors assessed. Results revealed higher temperatures for FN than TN patients (p=0.043), and more FN than TN patients had chills (p=0.058). CONCLUSIONS: The RIADT sensitivity was low, due to early administration of the test. In the epidemic season, the RIADT should not be used for suspected influenza until 12 h after symptom onset. A positive RIADT firmly supports the influenza diagnosis; a negative result does not confirm its absence. High fever and chills might indicate influenza, but additional tests are sometimes necessary.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3902527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39025272014-01-27 Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study Tanei, Mika Yokokawa, Hirohide Murai, Kenji Sakamoto, Rino Amari, Yu Boku, Soushin Inui, Akihiro Fujibayashi, Kazutoshi Uehara, Yuki Isonuma, Hiroshi Kikuchi, Ken Naito, Toshio BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT) and determine which symptoms are relevant to results. DESIGN: Single-centre, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care centre, Tokyo, Japan. PARTICIPANTS: 82 consecutive outpatients presenting with upper respiratory symptoms and fever ≥37°C at any time from symptom onset, between December 2010 and April 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of history and physical examination including age, sex, temperature, time of test from symptom onset, vaccination record and current symptoms (sore throat, arthralgia and/or myalgia, headache, chills, cough and/or throat phlegm, nasal discharge) were recorded. The RIADT and a fully automated respiratory virus nucleic acid test (Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus; VRV), the latter being the gold standard, were performed. Patients were divided into four groups: false negative (FN), RIADT− and VRV+; true positive (TP), RIADT+ and VRV+; true negative (TN), RIADT− and VRV−; and false positive, RIADT+ and VRV−. Groups were compared regarding age, sex, temperature, time of test from symptom onset, vaccination record and symptoms. RESULTS: RIADT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 72.9% (95% CI 61.5% to 84.2%), 91.3% (79.7% to 102.8%), 95.6% (89.5% to 101.6%) and 56.8% (40.8% to 72.7%), respectively. Time from symptom onset to test was shorter for the FN group than the TP group (p=0.009). No significant differences were detected for the other factors assessed. Results revealed higher temperatures for FN than TN patients (p=0.043), and more FN than TN patients had chills (p=0.058). CONCLUSIONS: The RIADT sensitivity was low, due to early administration of the test. In the epidemic season, the RIADT should not be used for suspected influenza until 12 h after symptom onset. A positive RIADT firmly supports the influenza diagnosis; a negative result does not confirm its absence. High fever and chills might indicate influenza, but additional tests are sometimes necessary. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3902527/ /pubmed/24384898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003885 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Infectious Diseases
Tanei, Mika
Yokokawa, Hirohide
Murai, Kenji
Sakamoto, Rino
Amari, Yu
Boku, Soushin
Inui, Akihiro
Fujibayashi, Kazutoshi
Uehara, Yuki
Isonuma, Hiroshi
Kikuchi, Ken
Naito, Toshio
Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study
title Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study
title_full Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study
title_short Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study
title_sort factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (riadt): a cross-sectional study
topic Infectious Diseases
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24384898
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003885
work_keys_str_mv AT taneimika factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT yokokawahirohide factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT muraikenji factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT sakamotorino factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT amariyu factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT bokusoushin factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT inuiakihiro factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT fujibayashikazutoshi factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT ueharayuki factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT isonumahiroshi factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT kikuchiken factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy
AT naitotoshio factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy