Cargando…
Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT) and determine which symptoms are relevant to results. DESIGN: Single-centre, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care centre, Tokyo, Japan. PARTICIPANTS: 82 consecutive outpatients presenting wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24384898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003885 |
_version_ | 1782300996218650624 |
---|---|
author | Tanei, Mika Yokokawa, Hirohide Murai, Kenji Sakamoto, Rino Amari, Yu Boku, Soushin Inui, Akihiro Fujibayashi, Kazutoshi Uehara, Yuki Isonuma, Hiroshi Kikuchi, Ken Naito, Toshio |
author_facet | Tanei, Mika Yokokawa, Hirohide Murai, Kenji Sakamoto, Rino Amari, Yu Boku, Soushin Inui, Akihiro Fujibayashi, Kazutoshi Uehara, Yuki Isonuma, Hiroshi Kikuchi, Ken Naito, Toshio |
author_sort | Tanei, Mika |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT) and determine which symptoms are relevant to results. DESIGN: Single-centre, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care centre, Tokyo, Japan. PARTICIPANTS: 82 consecutive outpatients presenting with upper respiratory symptoms and fever ≥37°C at any time from symptom onset, between December 2010 and April 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of history and physical examination including age, sex, temperature, time of test from symptom onset, vaccination record and current symptoms (sore throat, arthralgia and/or myalgia, headache, chills, cough and/or throat phlegm, nasal discharge) were recorded. The RIADT and a fully automated respiratory virus nucleic acid test (Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus; VRV), the latter being the gold standard, were performed. Patients were divided into four groups: false negative (FN), RIADT− and VRV+; true positive (TP), RIADT+ and VRV+; true negative (TN), RIADT− and VRV−; and false positive, RIADT+ and VRV−. Groups were compared regarding age, sex, temperature, time of test from symptom onset, vaccination record and symptoms. RESULTS: RIADT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 72.9% (95% CI 61.5% to 84.2%), 91.3% (79.7% to 102.8%), 95.6% (89.5% to 101.6%) and 56.8% (40.8% to 72.7%), respectively. Time from symptom onset to test was shorter for the FN group than the TP group (p=0.009). No significant differences were detected for the other factors assessed. Results revealed higher temperatures for FN than TN patients (p=0.043), and more FN than TN patients had chills (p=0.058). CONCLUSIONS: The RIADT sensitivity was low, due to early administration of the test. In the epidemic season, the RIADT should not be used for suspected influenza until 12 h after symptom onset. A positive RIADT firmly supports the influenza diagnosis; a negative result does not confirm its absence. High fever and chills might indicate influenza, but additional tests are sometimes necessary. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3902527 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39025272014-01-27 Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study Tanei, Mika Yokokawa, Hirohide Murai, Kenji Sakamoto, Rino Amari, Yu Boku, Soushin Inui, Akihiro Fujibayashi, Kazutoshi Uehara, Yuki Isonuma, Hiroshi Kikuchi, Ken Naito, Toshio BMJ Open Infectious Diseases OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT) and determine which symptoms are relevant to results. DESIGN: Single-centre, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Primary care centre, Tokyo, Japan. PARTICIPANTS: 82 consecutive outpatients presenting with upper respiratory symptoms and fever ≥37°C at any time from symptom onset, between December 2010 and April 2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Results of history and physical examination including age, sex, temperature, time of test from symptom onset, vaccination record and current symptoms (sore throat, arthralgia and/or myalgia, headache, chills, cough and/or throat phlegm, nasal discharge) were recorded. The RIADT and a fully automated respiratory virus nucleic acid test (Verigene Respiratory Virus Plus; VRV), the latter being the gold standard, were performed. Patients were divided into four groups: false negative (FN), RIADT− and VRV+; true positive (TP), RIADT+ and VRV+; true negative (TN), RIADT− and VRV−; and false positive, RIADT+ and VRV−. Groups were compared regarding age, sex, temperature, time of test from symptom onset, vaccination record and symptoms. RESULTS: RIADT sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 72.9% (95% CI 61.5% to 84.2%), 91.3% (79.7% to 102.8%), 95.6% (89.5% to 101.6%) and 56.8% (40.8% to 72.7%), respectively. Time from symptom onset to test was shorter for the FN group than the TP group (p=0.009). No significant differences were detected for the other factors assessed. Results revealed higher temperatures for FN than TN patients (p=0.043), and more FN than TN patients had chills (p=0.058). CONCLUSIONS: The RIADT sensitivity was low, due to early administration of the test. In the epidemic season, the RIADT should not be used for suspected influenza until 12 h after symptom onset. A positive RIADT firmly supports the influenza diagnosis; a negative result does not confirm its absence. High fever and chills might indicate influenza, but additional tests are sometimes necessary. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-01-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3902527/ /pubmed/24384898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003885 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Infectious Diseases Tanei, Mika Yokokawa, Hirohide Murai, Kenji Sakamoto, Rino Amari, Yu Boku, Soushin Inui, Akihiro Fujibayashi, Kazutoshi Uehara, Yuki Isonuma, Hiroshi Kikuchi, Ken Naito, Toshio Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study |
title | Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study |
title_full | Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study |
title_fullStr | Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study |
title_short | Factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (RIADT): a cross-sectional study |
title_sort | factors influencing the diagnostic accuracy of the rapid influenza antigen detection test (riadt): a cross-sectional study |
topic | Infectious Diseases |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3902527/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24384898 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003885 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT taneimika factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT yokokawahirohide factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT muraikenji factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT sakamotorino factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT amariyu factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT bokusoushin factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT inuiakihiro factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT fujibayashikazutoshi factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT ueharayuki factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT isonumahiroshi factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT kikuchiken factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy AT naitotoshio factorsinfluencingthediagnosticaccuracyoftherapidinfluenzaantigendetectiontestriadtacrosssectionalstudy |