Cargando…

Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study

BACKGROUND: Key goals in the treatment of CAP include early response to treatment and achievement of clinical stability. The US FDA recommends early response endpoints (72 hours after initiation of treatment) in clinical trials for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. REACH (REtr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blasi, Francesco, Ostermann, Helmut, Racketa, Jill, Medina, Jesús, McBride, Kyle, Garau, Javier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3903813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24450444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-15-6
_version_ 1782301147321597952
author Blasi, Francesco
Ostermann, Helmut
Racketa, Jill
Medina, Jesús
McBride, Kyle
Garau, Javier
author_facet Blasi, Francesco
Ostermann, Helmut
Racketa, Jill
Medina, Jesús
McBride, Kyle
Garau, Javier
author_sort Blasi, Francesco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Key goals in the treatment of CAP include early response to treatment and achievement of clinical stability. The US FDA recommends early response endpoints (72 hours after initiation of treatment) in clinical trials for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. REACH (REtrospective Study to Assess the Clinical Management of Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections [cSSTI] or CAP in the Hospital Setting) was a retrospective observational study, providing current data on the clinical management and resource burden of CAP in real-life settings in European hospitals. This analysis reviews the characteristics and outcomes of patients showing early positive response to treatment (time to clinical stability [TCS] ≤4 days, as assessed by Halm’s criteria) compared with patients with later positive response (TCS >4 days). METHODS: Patients were adults, hospitalized with CAP (2010–2011) and requiring in-hospital treatment with intravenous antibiotics. RESULTS: Of the 2039 patients included in REACH, 585 (28.7%) had TCS assessed by Halm’s criteria: 332 (56.8%) showed early response (median 3.0 days), and 253 (43.2%) showed later response to treatment (median 7.0 days). Use of Halm’s criteria varied across participating countries, ranging from 0% (Belgium) to 49.1% (UK). Patient characteristics and relevant medical history were similar between the two groups. There were no notable differences in initial antibiotic therapy between groups, except that more early responders had been treated with amoxicillin–clavulanate and amoxicillin monotherapy (22.6%; 7.5%, respectively) than later responders (5.9%; 1.2%, respectively). Initial treatment modification and re-infection or recurrences were less frequent in early responders compared with later responders (14.2% and 3.3% vs. 34.8% and 5.9%, respectively). Early responders had a shorter duration of hospitalization (mean 9.4 ± SD 7.0; median 8.0 days vs. mean 15.6 ± SD 10.5; median 12.0 days, respectively), lower rate of ICU admission (3.3% vs. 21.3%) and shorter duration of ICU stay (mean 6.2 ± SD 5.7; median 4.0 days vs. mean 10.4 ± SD 10.1; median 8.0 days, respectively) compared with later responders. Mortality was low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving early clinical stabilization in CAP (≤4 days) is associated with improved outcomes, lower requirement for initial treatment modification or readmission and lower resource use, compared with a later response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01293435
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3903813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39038132014-01-29 Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study Blasi, Francesco Ostermann, Helmut Racketa, Jill Medina, Jesús McBride, Kyle Garau, Javier Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Key goals in the treatment of CAP include early response to treatment and achievement of clinical stability. The US FDA recommends early response endpoints (72 hours after initiation of treatment) in clinical trials for the treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. REACH (REtrospective Study to Assess the Clinical Management of Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Complicated Skin and Soft Tissue Infections [cSSTI] or CAP in the Hospital Setting) was a retrospective observational study, providing current data on the clinical management and resource burden of CAP in real-life settings in European hospitals. This analysis reviews the characteristics and outcomes of patients showing early positive response to treatment (time to clinical stability [TCS] ≤4 days, as assessed by Halm’s criteria) compared with patients with later positive response (TCS >4 days). METHODS: Patients were adults, hospitalized with CAP (2010–2011) and requiring in-hospital treatment with intravenous antibiotics. RESULTS: Of the 2039 patients included in REACH, 585 (28.7%) had TCS assessed by Halm’s criteria: 332 (56.8%) showed early response (median 3.0 days), and 253 (43.2%) showed later response to treatment (median 7.0 days). Use of Halm’s criteria varied across participating countries, ranging from 0% (Belgium) to 49.1% (UK). Patient characteristics and relevant medical history were similar between the two groups. There were no notable differences in initial antibiotic therapy between groups, except that more early responders had been treated with amoxicillin–clavulanate and amoxicillin monotherapy (22.6%; 7.5%, respectively) than later responders (5.9%; 1.2%, respectively). Initial treatment modification and re-infection or recurrences were less frequent in early responders compared with later responders (14.2% and 3.3% vs. 34.8% and 5.9%, respectively). Early responders had a shorter duration of hospitalization (mean 9.4 ± SD 7.0; median 8.0 days vs. mean 15.6 ± SD 10.5; median 12.0 days, respectively), lower rate of ICU admission (3.3% vs. 21.3%) and shorter duration of ICU stay (mean 6.2 ± SD 5.7; median 4.0 days vs. mean 10.4 ± SD 10.1; median 8.0 days, respectively) compared with later responders. Mortality was low in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Achieving early clinical stabilization in CAP (≤4 days) is associated with improved outcomes, lower requirement for initial treatment modification or readmission and lower resource use, compared with a later response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01293435 BioMed Central 2014 2014-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3903813/ /pubmed/24450444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-15-6 Text en Copyright © 2014 Blasi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Blasi, Francesco
Ostermann, Helmut
Racketa, Jill
Medina, Jesús
McBride, Kyle
Garau, Javier
Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study
title Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study
title_full Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study
title_fullStr Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study
title_full_unstemmed Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study
title_short Early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the REACH study
title_sort early versus later response to treatment in patients with community-acquired pneumonia: analysis of the reach study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3903813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24450444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1465-9921-15-6
work_keys_str_mv AT blasifrancesco earlyversuslaterresponsetotreatmentinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumoniaanalysisofthereachstudy
AT ostermannhelmut earlyversuslaterresponsetotreatmentinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumoniaanalysisofthereachstudy
AT racketajill earlyversuslaterresponsetotreatmentinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumoniaanalysisofthereachstudy
AT medinajesus earlyversuslaterresponsetotreatmentinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumoniaanalysisofthereachstudy
AT mcbridekyle earlyversuslaterresponsetotreatmentinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumoniaanalysisofthereachstudy
AT garaujavier earlyversuslaterresponsetotreatmentinpatientswithcommunityacquiredpneumoniaanalysisofthereachstudy