Cargando…

The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise

BACKGROUND: Research into the methods used in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials is essential to ensure that effective methods are available and that clinical decisions made using results from trials are based on the best available evidence, which is reliable and robust....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tudur Smith, Catrin, Hickey, Helen, Clarke, Mike, Blazeby, Jane, Williamson, Paula
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24456928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-32
_version_ 1782301190593183744
author Tudur Smith, Catrin
Hickey, Helen
Clarke, Mike
Blazeby, Jane
Williamson, Paula
author_facet Tudur Smith, Catrin
Hickey, Helen
Clarke, Mike
Blazeby, Jane
Williamson, Paula
author_sort Tudur Smith, Catrin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research into the methods used in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials is essential to ensure that effective methods are available and that clinical decisions made using results from trials are based on the best available evidence, which is reliable and robust. METHODS: An on-line Delphi survey of 48 UK Clinical Research Collaboration registered Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) was undertaken. During round one, CTU Directors were asked to identify important topics that require methodological research. During round two, their opinion about the level of importance of each topic was recorded, and during round three, they were asked to review the group’s average opinion and revise their previous opinion if appropriate. Direct reminders were sent to maximise the number of responses at each round. Results are summarised using descriptive methods. RESULTS: Forty one (85%) CTU Directors responded to at least one round of the Delphi process: 25 (52%) responded in round one, 32 (67%) responded in round two, 24 (50%) responded in round three. There were only 12 (25%) who responded to all three rounds and 18 (38%) who responded to both rounds two and three. Consensus was achieved amongst CTU Directors that the top three priorities for trials methodological research were ‘Research into methods to boost recruitment in trials’ (considered the highest priority), ‘Methods to minimise attrition’ and ‘Choosing appropriate outcomes to measure’. Fifty other topics were included in the list of priorities and consensus was reached that two topics, ‘Radiotherapy study designs’ and ‘Low carbon trials’, were not priorities. CONCLUSIONS: This priority setting exercise has identified the research topics felt to be most important to the key stakeholder group of Directors of UKCRC registered CTUs. The use of robust methodology to identify these priorities will help ensure that this work informs the trials methodological research agenda, with a focus on topics that will have most impact and relevance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3904160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39041602014-01-29 The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise Tudur Smith, Catrin Hickey, Helen Clarke, Mike Blazeby, Jane Williamson, Paula Trials Research BACKGROUND: Research into the methods used in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of clinical trials is essential to ensure that effective methods are available and that clinical decisions made using results from trials are based on the best available evidence, which is reliable and robust. METHODS: An on-line Delphi survey of 48 UK Clinical Research Collaboration registered Clinical Trials Units (CTUs) was undertaken. During round one, CTU Directors were asked to identify important topics that require methodological research. During round two, their opinion about the level of importance of each topic was recorded, and during round three, they were asked to review the group’s average opinion and revise their previous opinion if appropriate. Direct reminders were sent to maximise the number of responses at each round. Results are summarised using descriptive methods. RESULTS: Forty one (85%) CTU Directors responded to at least one round of the Delphi process: 25 (52%) responded in round one, 32 (67%) responded in round two, 24 (50%) responded in round three. There were only 12 (25%) who responded to all three rounds and 18 (38%) who responded to both rounds two and three. Consensus was achieved amongst CTU Directors that the top three priorities for trials methodological research were ‘Research into methods to boost recruitment in trials’ (considered the highest priority), ‘Methods to minimise attrition’ and ‘Choosing appropriate outcomes to measure’. Fifty other topics were included in the list of priorities and consensus was reached that two topics, ‘Radiotherapy study designs’ and ‘Low carbon trials’, were not priorities. CONCLUSIONS: This priority setting exercise has identified the research topics felt to be most important to the key stakeholder group of Directors of UKCRC registered CTUs. The use of robust methodology to identify these priorities will help ensure that this work informs the trials methodological research agenda, with a focus on topics that will have most impact and relevance. BioMed Central 2014-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC3904160/ /pubmed/24456928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-32 Text en Copyright © 2014 Tudur Smith et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Tudur Smith, Catrin
Hickey, Helen
Clarke, Mike
Blazeby, Jane
Williamson, Paula
The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
title The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
title_full The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
title_fullStr The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
title_full_unstemmed The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
title_short The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
title_sort trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24456928
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-15-32
work_keys_str_mv AT tudursmithcatrin thetrialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise
AT hickeyhelen thetrialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise
AT clarkemike thetrialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise
AT blazebyjane thetrialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise
AT williamsonpaula thetrialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise
AT tudursmithcatrin trialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise
AT hickeyhelen trialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise
AT clarkemike trialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise
AT blazebyjane trialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise
AT williamsonpaula trialsmethodologicalresearchagendaresultsfromaprioritysettingexercise