Cargando…

Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research

We present a critical review of the literature on melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca’s aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, therapeutic protocols...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zumbansen, Anna, Peretz, Isabelle, Hébert, Sylvie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24478754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007
_version_ 1782301203981402112
author Zumbansen, Anna
Peretz, Isabelle
Hébert, Sylvie
author_facet Zumbansen, Anna
Peretz, Isabelle
Hébert, Sylvie
author_sort Zumbansen, Anna
collection PubMed
description We present a critical review of the literature on melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca’s aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, therapeutic protocols using singing as a speech facilitation technique are not necessarily MIT. The goal of MIT is to restore propositional speech. The rationale is that patients can learn a new way to speak through singing by using language-capable regions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Eventually, patients are supposed to use this way of speaking permanently but not to sing overtly. We argue that many treatment programs covered in systematic reviews on MIT’s efficacy do not match MIT’s therapeutic goal and rationale. Critically, we identified two main variations of MIT: the French thérapie mélodique et rythmée (TMR) that trains patients to use singing overtly as a facilitation technique in case of speech struggle and palliative versions of MIT that help patients with the most severe expressive deficits produce a limited set of useful, readymade phrases. Second, we distinguish between the immediate effect of singing on speech production and the long-term effect of the entire program on language recovery. Many results in the MIT literature can be explained by this temporal perspective. Finally, we propose that MIT can be viewed as a treatment of apraxia of speech more than aphasia. This issue should be explored in future experimental studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3904283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39042832014-01-29 Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research Zumbansen, Anna Peretz, Isabelle Hébert, Sylvie Front Neurol Neuroscience We present a critical review of the literature on melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca’s aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, therapeutic protocols using singing as a speech facilitation technique are not necessarily MIT. The goal of MIT is to restore propositional speech. The rationale is that patients can learn a new way to speak through singing by using language-capable regions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Eventually, patients are supposed to use this way of speaking permanently but not to sing overtly. We argue that many treatment programs covered in systematic reviews on MIT’s efficacy do not match MIT’s therapeutic goal and rationale. Critically, we identified two main variations of MIT: the French thérapie mélodique et rythmée (TMR) that trains patients to use singing overtly as a facilitation technique in case of speech struggle and palliative versions of MIT that help patients with the most severe expressive deficits produce a limited set of useful, readymade phrases. Second, we distinguish between the immediate effect of singing on speech production and the long-term effect of the entire program on language recovery. Many results in the MIT literature can be explained by this temporal perspective. Finally, we propose that MIT can be viewed as a treatment of apraxia of speech more than aphasia. This issue should be explored in future experimental studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3904283/ /pubmed/24478754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007 Text en Copyright © 2014 Zumbansen, Peretz and Hébert. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Zumbansen, Anna
Peretz, Isabelle
Hébert, Sylvie
Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_full Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_fullStr Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_full_unstemmed Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_short Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
title_sort melodic intonation therapy: back to basics for future research
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24478754
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007
work_keys_str_mv AT zumbansenanna melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch
AT peretzisabelle melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch
AT hebertsylvie melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch