Cargando…
Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research
We present a critical review of the literature on melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca’s aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, therapeutic protocols...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24478754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007 |
_version_ | 1782301203981402112 |
---|---|
author | Zumbansen, Anna Peretz, Isabelle Hébert, Sylvie |
author_facet | Zumbansen, Anna Peretz, Isabelle Hébert, Sylvie |
author_sort | Zumbansen, Anna |
collection | PubMed |
description | We present a critical review of the literature on melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca’s aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, therapeutic protocols using singing as a speech facilitation technique are not necessarily MIT. The goal of MIT is to restore propositional speech. The rationale is that patients can learn a new way to speak through singing by using language-capable regions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Eventually, patients are supposed to use this way of speaking permanently but not to sing overtly. We argue that many treatment programs covered in systematic reviews on MIT’s efficacy do not match MIT’s therapeutic goal and rationale. Critically, we identified two main variations of MIT: the French thérapie mélodique et rythmée (TMR) that trains patients to use singing overtly as a facilitation technique in case of speech struggle and palliative versions of MIT that help patients with the most severe expressive deficits produce a limited set of useful, readymade phrases. Second, we distinguish between the immediate effect of singing on speech production and the long-term effect of the entire program on language recovery. Many results in the MIT literature can be explained by this temporal perspective. Finally, we propose that MIT can be viewed as a treatment of apraxia of speech more than aphasia. This issue should be explored in future experimental studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3904283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39042832014-01-29 Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research Zumbansen, Anna Peretz, Isabelle Hébert, Sylvie Front Neurol Neuroscience We present a critical review of the literature on melodic intonation therapy (MIT), one of the most formalized treatments used by speech-language therapist in Broca’s aphasia. We suggest basic clarifications to enhance the scientific support of this promising treatment. First, therapeutic protocols using singing as a speech facilitation technique are not necessarily MIT. The goal of MIT is to restore propositional speech. The rationale is that patients can learn a new way to speak through singing by using language-capable regions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Eventually, patients are supposed to use this way of speaking permanently but not to sing overtly. We argue that many treatment programs covered in systematic reviews on MIT’s efficacy do not match MIT’s therapeutic goal and rationale. Critically, we identified two main variations of MIT: the French thérapie mélodique et rythmée (TMR) that trains patients to use singing overtly as a facilitation technique in case of speech struggle and palliative versions of MIT that help patients with the most severe expressive deficits produce a limited set of useful, readymade phrases. Second, we distinguish between the immediate effect of singing on speech production and the long-term effect of the entire program on language recovery. Many results in the MIT literature can be explained by this temporal perspective. Finally, we propose that MIT can be viewed as a treatment of apraxia of speech more than aphasia. This issue should be explored in future experimental studies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3904283/ /pubmed/24478754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007 Text en Copyright © 2014 Zumbansen, Peretz and Hébert. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Zumbansen, Anna Peretz, Isabelle Hébert, Sylvie Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research |
title | Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research |
title_full | Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research |
title_fullStr | Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research |
title_full_unstemmed | Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research |
title_short | Melodic Intonation Therapy: Back to Basics for Future Research |
title_sort | melodic intonation therapy: back to basics for future research |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24478754 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2014.00007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zumbansenanna melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch AT peretzisabelle melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch AT hebertsylvie melodicintonationtherapybacktobasicsforfutureresearch |