Cargando…

Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study

Neuroanatomic phenotypes are often assessed using volumetric analysis. Although powerful and versatile, this approach is limited in that it is unable to quantify changes in shape, to describe how regions are interrelated, or to determine whether changes in size are global or local. Statistical shape...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chollet, Madeleine B., Aldridge, Kristina, Pangborn, Nicole, Weinberg, Seth M., DeLeon, Valerie B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24489689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086005
_version_ 1782301250304344064
author Chollet, Madeleine B.
Aldridge, Kristina
Pangborn, Nicole
Weinberg, Seth M.
DeLeon, Valerie B.
author_facet Chollet, Madeleine B.
Aldridge, Kristina
Pangborn, Nicole
Weinberg, Seth M.
DeLeon, Valerie B.
author_sort Chollet, Madeleine B.
collection PubMed
description Neuroanatomic phenotypes are often assessed using volumetric analysis. Although powerful and versatile, this approach is limited in that it is unable to quantify changes in shape, to describe how regions are interrelated, or to determine whether changes in size are global or local. Statistical shape analysis using coordinate data from biologically relevant landmarks is the preferred method for testing these aspects of phenotype. To date, approximately fifty landmarks have been used to study brain shape. Of the studies that have used landmark-based statistical shape analysis of the brain, most have not published protocols for landmark identification or the results of reliability studies on these landmarks. The primary aims of this study were two-fold: (1) to collaboratively develop detailed data collection protocols for a set of brain landmarks, and (2) to complete an intra- and inter-observer validation study of the set of landmarks. Detailed protocols were developed for 29 cortical and subcortical landmarks using a sample of 10 boys aged 12 years old. Average intra-observer error for the final set of landmarks was 1.9 mm with a range of 0.72 mm–5.6 mm. Average inter-observer error was 1.1 mm with a range of 0.40 mm–3.4 mm. This study successfully establishes landmark protocols with a minimal level of error that can be used by other researchers in the assessment of neuroanatomic phenotypes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3904856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39048562014-01-31 Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study Chollet, Madeleine B. Aldridge, Kristina Pangborn, Nicole Weinberg, Seth M. DeLeon, Valerie B. PLoS One Research Article Neuroanatomic phenotypes are often assessed using volumetric analysis. Although powerful and versatile, this approach is limited in that it is unable to quantify changes in shape, to describe how regions are interrelated, or to determine whether changes in size are global or local. Statistical shape analysis using coordinate data from biologically relevant landmarks is the preferred method for testing these aspects of phenotype. To date, approximately fifty landmarks have been used to study brain shape. Of the studies that have used landmark-based statistical shape analysis of the brain, most have not published protocols for landmark identification or the results of reliability studies on these landmarks. The primary aims of this study were two-fold: (1) to collaboratively develop detailed data collection protocols for a set of brain landmarks, and (2) to complete an intra- and inter-observer validation study of the set of landmarks. Detailed protocols were developed for 29 cortical and subcortical landmarks using a sample of 10 boys aged 12 years old. Average intra-observer error for the final set of landmarks was 1.9 mm with a range of 0.72 mm–5.6 mm. Average inter-observer error was 1.1 mm with a range of 0.40 mm–3.4 mm. This study successfully establishes landmark protocols with a minimal level of error that can be used by other researchers in the assessment of neuroanatomic phenotypes. Public Library of Science 2014-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3904856/ /pubmed/24489689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086005 Text en © 2014 Chollet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chollet, Madeleine B.
Aldridge, Kristina
Pangborn, Nicole
Weinberg, Seth M.
DeLeon, Valerie B.
Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study
title Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study
title_full Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study
title_fullStr Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study
title_full_unstemmed Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study
title_short Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study
title_sort landmarking the brain for geometric morphometric analysis: an error study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24489689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086005
work_keys_str_mv AT cholletmadeleineb landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy
AT aldridgekristina landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy
AT pangbornnicole landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy
AT weinbergsethm landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy
AT deleonvalerieb landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy