Cargando…
Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study
Neuroanatomic phenotypes are often assessed using volumetric analysis. Although powerful and versatile, this approach is limited in that it is unable to quantify changes in shape, to describe how regions are interrelated, or to determine whether changes in size are global or local. Statistical shape...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24489689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086005 |
_version_ | 1782301250304344064 |
---|---|
author | Chollet, Madeleine B. Aldridge, Kristina Pangborn, Nicole Weinberg, Seth M. DeLeon, Valerie B. |
author_facet | Chollet, Madeleine B. Aldridge, Kristina Pangborn, Nicole Weinberg, Seth M. DeLeon, Valerie B. |
author_sort | Chollet, Madeleine B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neuroanatomic phenotypes are often assessed using volumetric analysis. Although powerful and versatile, this approach is limited in that it is unable to quantify changes in shape, to describe how regions are interrelated, or to determine whether changes in size are global or local. Statistical shape analysis using coordinate data from biologically relevant landmarks is the preferred method for testing these aspects of phenotype. To date, approximately fifty landmarks have been used to study brain shape. Of the studies that have used landmark-based statistical shape analysis of the brain, most have not published protocols for landmark identification or the results of reliability studies on these landmarks. The primary aims of this study were two-fold: (1) to collaboratively develop detailed data collection protocols for a set of brain landmarks, and (2) to complete an intra- and inter-observer validation study of the set of landmarks. Detailed protocols were developed for 29 cortical and subcortical landmarks using a sample of 10 boys aged 12 years old. Average intra-observer error for the final set of landmarks was 1.9 mm with a range of 0.72 mm–5.6 mm. Average inter-observer error was 1.1 mm with a range of 0.40 mm–3.4 mm. This study successfully establishes landmark protocols with a minimal level of error that can be used by other researchers in the assessment of neuroanatomic phenotypes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3904856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39048562014-01-31 Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study Chollet, Madeleine B. Aldridge, Kristina Pangborn, Nicole Weinberg, Seth M. DeLeon, Valerie B. PLoS One Research Article Neuroanatomic phenotypes are often assessed using volumetric analysis. Although powerful and versatile, this approach is limited in that it is unable to quantify changes in shape, to describe how regions are interrelated, or to determine whether changes in size are global or local. Statistical shape analysis using coordinate data from biologically relevant landmarks is the preferred method for testing these aspects of phenotype. To date, approximately fifty landmarks have been used to study brain shape. Of the studies that have used landmark-based statistical shape analysis of the brain, most have not published protocols for landmark identification or the results of reliability studies on these landmarks. The primary aims of this study were two-fold: (1) to collaboratively develop detailed data collection protocols for a set of brain landmarks, and (2) to complete an intra- and inter-observer validation study of the set of landmarks. Detailed protocols were developed for 29 cortical and subcortical landmarks using a sample of 10 boys aged 12 years old. Average intra-observer error for the final set of landmarks was 1.9 mm with a range of 0.72 mm–5.6 mm. Average inter-observer error was 1.1 mm with a range of 0.40 mm–3.4 mm. This study successfully establishes landmark protocols with a minimal level of error that can be used by other researchers in the assessment of neuroanatomic phenotypes. Public Library of Science 2014-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3904856/ /pubmed/24489689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086005 Text en © 2014 Chollet et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chollet, Madeleine B. Aldridge, Kristina Pangborn, Nicole Weinberg, Seth M. DeLeon, Valerie B. Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study |
title | Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study |
title_full | Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study |
title_fullStr | Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study |
title_short | Landmarking the Brain for Geometric Morphometric Analysis: An Error Study |
title_sort | landmarking the brain for geometric morphometric analysis: an error study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3904856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24489689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0086005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cholletmadeleineb landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy AT aldridgekristina landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy AT pangbornnicole landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy AT weinbergsethm landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy AT deleonvalerieb landmarkingthebrainforgeometricmorphometricanalysisanerrorstudy |