Cargando…
New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe
Mercury dental amalgam has a long history of ostensibly safe use despite its continuous release of mercury vapor. Two key studies known as the Children’s Amalgam Trials are widely cited as evidence of safety. However, four recent reanalyses of one of these trials now suggest harm, particularly to bo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24420334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-013-9700-9 |
_version_ | 1782301300743995392 |
---|---|
author | Homme, Kristin G. Kern, Janet K. Haley, Boyd E. Geier, David A. King, Paul G. Sykes, Lisa K. Geier, Mark R. |
author_facet | Homme, Kristin G. Kern, Janet K. Haley, Boyd E. Geier, David A. King, Paul G. Sykes, Lisa K. Geier, Mark R. |
author_sort | Homme, Kristin G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mercury dental amalgam has a long history of ostensibly safe use despite its continuous release of mercury vapor. Two key studies known as the Children’s Amalgam Trials are widely cited as evidence of safety. However, four recent reanalyses of one of these trials now suggest harm, particularly to boys with common genetic variants. These and other studies suggest that susceptibility to mercury toxicity differs among individuals based on multiple genes, not all of which have been identified. These studies further suggest that the levels of exposure to mercury vapor from dental amalgams may be unsafe for certain subpopulations. Moreover, a simple comparison of typical exposures versus regulatory safety standards suggests that many people receive unsafe exposures. Chronic mercury toxicity is especially insidious because symptoms are variable and nonspecific, diagnostic tests are often misunderstood, and treatments are speculative at best. Throughout the world, efforts are underway to phase down or eliminate the use of mercury dental amalgam. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3905169 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39051692014-01-30 New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe Homme, Kristin G. Kern, Janet K. Haley, Boyd E. Geier, David A. King, Paul G. Sykes, Lisa K. Geier, Mark R. Biometals Article Mercury dental amalgam has a long history of ostensibly safe use despite its continuous release of mercury vapor. Two key studies known as the Children’s Amalgam Trials are widely cited as evidence of safety. However, four recent reanalyses of one of these trials now suggest harm, particularly to boys with common genetic variants. These and other studies suggest that susceptibility to mercury toxicity differs among individuals based on multiple genes, not all of which have been identified. These studies further suggest that the levels of exposure to mercury vapor from dental amalgams may be unsafe for certain subpopulations. Moreover, a simple comparison of typical exposures versus regulatory safety standards suggests that many people receive unsafe exposures. Chronic mercury toxicity is especially insidious because symptoms are variable and nonspecific, diagnostic tests are often misunderstood, and treatments are speculative at best. Throughout the world, efforts are underway to phase down or eliminate the use of mercury dental amalgam. Springer Netherlands 2014-01-14 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3905169/ /pubmed/24420334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-013-9700-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Homme, Kristin G. Kern, Janet K. Haley, Boyd E. Geier, David A. King, Paul G. Sykes, Lisa K. Geier, Mark R. New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe |
title | New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe |
title_full | New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe |
title_fullStr | New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe |
title_full_unstemmed | New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe |
title_short | New science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe |
title_sort | new science challenges old notion that mercury dental amalgam is safe |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905169/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24420334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10534-013-9700-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hommekristing newsciencechallengesoldnotionthatmercurydentalamalgamissafe AT kernjanetk newsciencechallengesoldnotionthatmercurydentalamalgamissafe AT haleyboyde newsciencechallengesoldnotionthatmercurydentalamalgamissafe AT geierdavida newsciencechallengesoldnotionthatmercurydentalamalgamissafe AT kingpaulg newsciencechallengesoldnotionthatmercurydentalamalgamissafe AT sykeslisak newsciencechallengesoldnotionthatmercurydentalamalgamissafe AT geiermarkr newsciencechallengesoldnotionthatmercurydentalamalgamissafe |