Cargando…
Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study
PURPOSE: General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for gene...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22241093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2011.15 |
_version_ | 1782301374120198144 |
---|---|
author | Houwink, Elisa J.F. Henneman, Lidewij Westerneng, Myrte van Luijk, Scheltus J. Cornel, Martina C. Dinant, Jan Geert Vleuten, Cees van der |
author_facet | Houwink, Elisa J.F. Henneman, Lidewij Westerneng, Myrte van Luijk, Scheltus J. Cornel, Martina C. Dinant, Jan Geert Vleuten, Cees van der |
author_sort | Houwink, Elisa J.F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for general practice. METHODS: A Delphi consensus procedure consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogeneous panel (n = 18) of experts, comprising six practicing GPs who were also engaged in research, five GP trainers, four clinical genetics professionals, and three representatives of patient organizations, participated. Educational needs regarding genetics in general practice in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were rated and ranked in a top-10 list. RESULTS: The entire panel completed all three rounds. Kendall's coefficient of concordance indicated significant agreement regarding the top 10 genetic education needs (P < 0.001). “Recognizing signals that are potentially indicative of a hereditary component of a disease” was rated highest, followed by “Evaluating indications for referral to a clinical genetics centre” and “Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of genetic tests.” CONCLUSIONS: The priorities resulting from this study can inform the development of educational modules, including input for case-based education, to improve GP performance in genetic patient care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3905703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39057032014-01-29 Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study Houwink, Elisa J.F. Henneman, Lidewij Westerneng, Myrte van Luijk, Scheltus J. Cornel, Martina C. Dinant, Jan Geert Vleuten, Cees van der Genet Med Original Research Article PURPOSE: General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for general practice. METHODS: A Delphi consensus procedure consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogeneous panel (n = 18) of experts, comprising six practicing GPs who were also engaged in research, five GP trainers, four clinical genetics professionals, and three representatives of patient organizations, participated. Educational needs regarding genetics in general practice in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were rated and ranked in a top-10 list. RESULTS: The entire panel completed all three rounds. Kendall's coefficient of concordance indicated significant agreement regarding the top 10 genetic education needs (P < 0.001). “Recognizing signals that are potentially indicative of a hereditary component of a disease” was rated highest, followed by “Evaluating indications for referral to a clinical genetics centre” and “Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of genetic tests.” CONCLUSIONS: The priorities resulting from this study can inform the development of educational modules, including input for case-based education, to improve GP performance in genetic patient care. Nature Publishing Group 2012-03 2012-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3905703/ /pubmed/22241093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2011.15 Text en Copyright © 2012 American College of Medical Genetics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Houwink, Elisa J.F. Henneman, Lidewij Westerneng, Myrte van Luijk, Scheltus J. Cornel, Martina C. Dinant, Jan Geert Vleuten, Cees van der Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study |
title | Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study |
title_full | Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study |
title_fullStr | Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed | Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study |
title_short | Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study |
title_sort | prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a delphi study |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22241093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2011.15 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT houwinkelisajf prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy AT hennemanlidewij prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy AT westernengmyrte prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy AT vanluijkscheltusj prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy AT cornelmartinac prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy AT dinantjangeert prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy AT vleutenceesvander prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy |