Cargando…

Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study

PURPOSE: General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for gene...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Houwink, Elisa J.F., Henneman, Lidewij, Westerneng, Myrte, van Luijk, Scheltus J., Cornel, Martina C., Dinant, Jan Geert, Vleuten, Cees van der
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22241093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2011.15
_version_ 1782301374120198144
author Houwink, Elisa J.F.
Henneman, Lidewij
Westerneng, Myrte
van Luijk, Scheltus J.
Cornel, Martina C.
Dinant, Jan Geert
Vleuten, Cees van der
author_facet Houwink, Elisa J.F.
Henneman, Lidewij
Westerneng, Myrte
van Luijk, Scheltus J.
Cornel, Martina C.
Dinant, Jan Geert
Vleuten, Cees van der
author_sort Houwink, Elisa J.F.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for general practice. METHODS: A Delphi consensus procedure consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogeneous panel (n = 18) of experts, comprising six practicing GPs who were also engaged in research, five GP trainers, four clinical genetics professionals, and three representatives of patient organizations, participated. Educational needs regarding genetics in general practice in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were rated and ranked in a top-10 list. RESULTS: The entire panel completed all three rounds. Kendall's coefficient of concordance indicated significant agreement regarding the top 10 genetic education needs (P < 0.001). “Recognizing signals that are potentially indicative of a hereditary component of a disease” was rated highest, followed by “Evaluating indications for referral to a clinical genetics centre” and “Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of genetic tests.” CONCLUSIONS: The priorities resulting from this study can inform the development of educational modules, including input for case-based education, to improve GP performance in genetic patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3905703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39057032014-01-29 Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study Houwink, Elisa J.F. Henneman, Lidewij Westerneng, Myrte van Luijk, Scheltus J. Cornel, Martina C. Dinant, Jan Geert Vleuten, Cees van der Genet Med Original Research Article PURPOSE: General practitioners (GPs) are increasingly expected to deliver genetics services in daily patient care. Education in primary care genetics is considered suboptimal and in urgent need of revision and innovation. The aim of this study was to prioritize topics for genetics education for general practice. METHODS: A Delphi consensus procedure consisting of three rounds was conducted. A purposively selected heterogeneous panel (n = 18) of experts, comprising six practicing GPs who were also engaged in research, five GP trainers, four clinical genetics professionals, and three representatives of patient organizations, participated. Educational needs regarding genetics in general practice in terms of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were rated and ranked in a top-10 list. RESULTS: The entire panel completed all three rounds. Kendall's coefficient of concordance indicated significant agreement regarding the top 10 genetic education needs (P < 0.001). “Recognizing signals that are potentially indicative of a hereditary component of a disease” was rated highest, followed by “Evaluating indications for referral to a clinical genetics centre” and “Knowledge of the possibilities and limitations of genetic tests.” CONCLUSIONS: The priorities resulting from this study can inform the development of educational modules, including input for case-based education, to improve GP performance in genetic patient care. Nature Publishing Group 2012-03 2012-01-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3905703/ /pubmed/22241093 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2011.15 Text en Copyright © 2012 American College of Medical Genetics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Houwink, Elisa J.F.
Henneman, Lidewij
Westerneng, Myrte
van Luijk, Scheltus J.
Cornel, Martina C.
Dinant, Jan Geert
Vleuten, Cees van der
Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study
title Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study
title_full Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study
title_fullStr Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study
title_short Prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a Delphi study
title_sort prioritization of future genetics education for general practitioners: a delphi study
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22241093
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2011.15
work_keys_str_mv AT houwinkelisajf prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy
AT hennemanlidewij prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy
AT westernengmyrte prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy
AT vanluijkscheltusj prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy
AT cornelmartinac prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy
AT dinantjangeert prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy
AT vleutenceesvander prioritizationoffuturegeneticseducationforgeneralpractitionersadelphistudy