Cargando…

Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques

The epigenetic modification of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is receiving great attention due to its potential role in DNA methylation reprogramming and as a cell state identifier. Given this interest, it is important to identify reliable and cost-effective methods for the enrichment of 5hmC marked...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, John P., Hunter, Jennifer M., Nestor, Colm E., Dunican, Donncha S., Terranova, Rémi, Moggs, Jonathan G., Meehan, Richard R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24214958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1080
_version_ 1782301403248590848
author Thomson, John P.
Hunter, Jennifer M.
Nestor, Colm E.
Dunican, Donncha S.
Terranova, Rémi
Moggs, Jonathan G.
Meehan, Richard R.
author_facet Thomson, John P.
Hunter, Jennifer M.
Nestor, Colm E.
Dunican, Donncha S.
Terranova, Rémi
Moggs, Jonathan G.
Meehan, Richard R.
author_sort Thomson, John P.
collection PubMed
description The epigenetic modification of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is receiving great attention due to its potential role in DNA methylation reprogramming and as a cell state identifier. Given this interest, it is important to identify reliable and cost-effective methods for the enrichment of 5hmC marked DNA for downstream analysis. We tested three commonly used affinity-based enrichment techniques; (i) antibody, (ii) chemical capture and (iii) protein affinity enrichment and assessed their ability to accurately and reproducibly report 5hmC profiles in mouse tissues containing high (brain) and lower (liver) levels of 5hmC. The protein-affinity technique is a poor reporter of 5hmC profiles, delivering 5hmC patterns that are incompatible with other methods. Both antibody and chemical capture-based techniques generate highly similar genome-wide patterns for 5hmC, which are independently validated by standard quantitative PCR (qPCR) and glucosyl-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion (gRES-qPCR). Both antibody and chemical capture generated profiles reproducibly link to unique chromatin modification profiles associated with 5hmC. However, there appears to be a slight bias of the antibody to bind to regions of DNA rich in simple repeats. Ultimately, the increased specificity observed with chemical capture-based approaches makes this an attractive method for the analysis of locus-specific or genome-wide patterns of 5hmC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3905904
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39059042014-01-29 Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques Thomson, John P. Hunter, Jennifer M. Nestor, Colm E. Dunican, Donncha S. Terranova, Rémi Moggs, Jonathan G. Meehan, Richard R. Nucleic Acids Res Methods Online The epigenetic modification of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC) is receiving great attention due to its potential role in DNA methylation reprogramming and as a cell state identifier. Given this interest, it is important to identify reliable and cost-effective methods for the enrichment of 5hmC marked DNA for downstream analysis. We tested three commonly used affinity-based enrichment techniques; (i) antibody, (ii) chemical capture and (iii) protein affinity enrichment and assessed their ability to accurately and reproducibly report 5hmC profiles in mouse tissues containing high (brain) and lower (liver) levels of 5hmC. The protein-affinity technique is a poor reporter of 5hmC profiles, delivering 5hmC patterns that are incompatible with other methods. Both antibody and chemical capture-based techniques generate highly similar genome-wide patterns for 5hmC, which are independently validated by standard quantitative PCR (qPCR) and glucosyl-sensitive restriction enzyme digestion (gRES-qPCR). Both antibody and chemical capture generated profiles reproducibly link to unique chromatin modification profiles associated with 5hmC. However, there appears to be a slight bias of the antibody to bind to regions of DNA rich in simple repeats. Ultimately, the increased specificity observed with chemical capture-based approaches makes this an attractive method for the analysis of locus-specific or genome-wide patterns of 5hmC. Oxford University Press 2013-12 2013-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3905904/ /pubmed/24214958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1080 Text en © The Author(s) 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methods Online
Thomson, John P.
Hunter, Jennifer M.
Nestor, Colm E.
Dunican, Donncha S.
Terranova, Rémi
Moggs, Jonathan G.
Meehan, Richard R.
Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques
title Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques
title_full Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques
title_short Comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques
title_sort comparative analysis of affinity-based 5-hydroxymethylation enrichment techniques
topic Methods Online
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905904/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24214958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt1080
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonjohnp comparativeanalysisofaffinitybased5hydroxymethylationenrichmenttechniques
AT hunterjenniferm comparativeanalysisofaffinitybased5hydroxymethylationenrichmenttechniques
AT nestorcolme comparativeanalysisofaffinitybased5hydroxymethylationenrichmenttechniques
AT dunicandonnchas comparativeanalysisofaffinitybased5hydroxymethylationenrichmenttechniques
AT terranovaremi comparativeanalysisofaffinitybased5hydroxymethylationenrichmenttechniques
AT moggsjonathang comparativeanalysisofaffinitybased5hydroxymethylationenrichmenttechniques
AT meehanrichardr comparativeanalysisofaffinitybased5hydroxymethylationenrichmenttechniques