Cargando…

The epidemiological impact of childhood influenza vaccination using live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany: predictions of a simulation study

BACKGROUND: Routine annual influenza vaccination is primarily recommended for all persons aged 60 and above and for people with underlying chronic conditions in Germany. Other countries have already adopted additional childhood influenza immunisation programmes. The objective of this study is to det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rose, Markus A, Damm, Oliver, Greiner, Wolfgang, Knuf, Markus, Wutzler, Peter, Liese, Johannes G, Krüger, Hagen, Wahn, Ulrich, Schaberg, Tom, Schwehm, Markus, Kochmann, Thomas F, Eichner, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24450996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-40
_version_ 1782301408074137600
author Rose, Markus A
Damm, Oliver
Greiner, Wolfgang
Knuf, Markus
Wutzler, Peter
Liese, Johannes G
Krüger, Hagen
Wahn, Ulrich
Schaberg, Tom
Schwehm, Markus
Kochmann, Thomas F
Eichner, Martin
author_facet Rose, Markus A
Damm, Oliver
Greiner, Wolfgang
Knuf, Markus
Wutzler, Peter
Liese, Johannes G
Krüger, Hagen
Wahn, Ulrich
Schaberg, Tom
Schwehm, Markus
Kochmann, Thomas F
Eichner, Martin
author_sort Rose, Markus A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Routine annual influenza vaccination is primarily recommended for all persons aged 60 and above and for people with underlying chronic conditions in Germany. Other countries have already adopted additional childhood influenza immunisation programmes. The objective of this study is to determine the potential epidemiological impact of implementing paediatric influenza vaccination using intranasally administered live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany. METHODS: A deterministic age-structured model is used to simulate the population-level impact of different vaccination strategies on the transmission dynamics of seasonal influenza in Germany. In our base-case analysis, we estimate the effects of adding a LAIV-based immunisation programme targeting children 2 to 17 years of age to the existing influenza vaccination policy. The data used in the model is based on published evidence complemented by expert opinion. RESULTS: In our model, additional vaccination of children 2 to 17 years of age with LAIV leads to the prevention of 23.9 million influenza infections and nearly 16 million symptomatic influenza cases within 10 years. This reduction in burden of disease is not restricted to children. About one third of all adult cases can indirectly be prevented by LAIV immunisation of children. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that vaccinating children 2–17 years of age is likely associated with a significant reduction in the burden of paediatric influenza. Furthermore, annual routine childhood vaccination against seasonal influenza is expected to decrease the incidence of influenza among adults and older people due to indirect effects of herd protection. In summary, our model provides data supporting the introduction of a paediatric influenza immunisation programme in Germany.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3905925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39059252014-02-11 The epidemiological impact of childhood influenza vaccination using live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany: predictions of a simulation study Rose, Markus A Damm, Oliver Greiner, Wolfgang Knuf, Markus Wutzler, Peter Liese, Johannes G Krüger, Hagen Wahn, Ulrich Schaberg, Tom Schwehm, Markus Kochmann, Thomas F Eichner, Martin BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Routine annual influenza vaccination is primarily recommended for all persons aged 60 and above and for people with underlying chronic conditions in Germany. Other countries have already adopted additional childhood influenza immunisation programmes. The objective of this study is to determine the potential epidemiological impact of implementing paediatric influenza vaccination using intranasally administered live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany. METHODS: A deterministic age-structured model is used to simulate the population-level impact of different vaccination strategies on the transmission dynamics of seasonal influenza in Germany. In our base-case analysis, we estimate the effects of adding a LAIV-based immunisation programme targeting children 2 to 17 years of age to the existing influenza vaccination policy. The data used in the model is based on published evidence complemented by expert opinion. RESULTS: In our model, additional vaccination of children 2 to 17 years of age with LAIV leads to the prevention of 23.9 million influenza infections and nearly 16 million symptomatic influenza cases within 10 years. This reduction in burden of disease is not restricted to children. About one third of all adult cases can indirectly be prevented by LAIV immunisation of children. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that vaccinating children 2–17 years of age is likely associated with a significant reduction in the burden of paediatric influenza. Furthermore, annual routine childhood vaccination against seasonal influenza is expected to decrease the incidence of influenza among adults and older people due to indirect effects of herd protection. In summary, our model provides data supporting the introduction of a paediatric influenza immunisation programme in Germany. BioMed Central 2014-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC3905925/ /pubmed/24450996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-40 Text en Copyright © 2014 Rose et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rose, Markus A
Damm, Oliver
Greiner, Wolfgang
Knuf, Markus
Wutzler, Peter
Liese, Johannes G
Krüger, Hagen
Wahn, Ulrich
Schaberg, Tom
Schwehm, Markus
Kochmann, Thomas F
Eichner, Martin
The epidemiological impact of childhood influenza vaccination using live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany: predictions of a simulation study
title The epidemiological impact of childhood influenza vaccination using live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany: predictions of a simulation study
title_full The epidemiological impact of childhood influenza vaccination using live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany: predictions of a simulation study
title_fullStr The epidemiological impact of childhood influenza vaccination using live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany: predictions of a simulation study
title_full_unstemmed The epidemiological impact of childhood influenza vaccination using live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany: predictions of a simulation study
title_short The epidemiological impact of childhood influenza vaccination using live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) in Germany: predictions of a simulation study
title_sort epidemiological impact of childhood influenza vaccination using live-attenuated influenza vaccine (laiv) in germany: predictions of a simulation study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3905925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24450996
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2334-14-40
work_keys_str_mv AT rosemarkusa theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT dammoliver theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT greinerwolfgang theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT knufmarkus theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT wutzlerpeter theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT liesejohannesg theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT krugerhagen theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT wahnulrich theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT schabergtom theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT schwehmmarkus theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT kochmannthomasf theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT eichnermartin theepidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT rosemarkusa epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT dammoliver epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT greinerwolfgang epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT knufmarkus epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT wutzlerpeter epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT liesejohannesg epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT krugerhagen epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT wahnulrich epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT schabergtom epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT schwehmmarkus epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT kochmannthomasf epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy
AT eichnermartin epidemiologicalimpactofchildhoodinfluenzavaccinationusingliveattenuatedinfluenzavaccinelaivingermanypredictionsofasimulationstudy