Cargando…
Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (Fl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group US
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3906045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2365 |
_version_ | 1782301426652807168 |
---|---|
author | Aghaeepour, Nima Finak, Greg Hoos, Holger Mosmann, Tim R Brinkman, Ryan Gottardo, Raphael Scheuermann, Richard H |
author_facet | Aghaeepour, Nima Finak, Greg Hoos, Holger Mosmann, Tim R Brinkman, Ryan Gottardo, Raphael Scheuermann, Richard H |
author_sort | Aghaeepour, Nima |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods have reached a sufficient level of maturity and accuracy for reliable use in FCM data analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2365) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3906045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39060452014-01-29 Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques Aghaeepour, Nima Finak, Greg Hoos, Holger Mosmann, Tim R Brinkman, Ryan Gottardo, Raphael Scheuermann, Richard H Nat Methods Article Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods have reached a sufficient level of maturity and accuracy for reliable use in FCM data analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2365) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Nature Publishing Group US 2013-02-10 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3906045/ /pubmed/23396282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2365 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Aghaeepour, Nima Finak, Greg Hoos, Holger Mosmann, Tim R Brinkman, Ryan Gottardo, Raphael Scheuermann, Richard H Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques |
title | Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques |
title_full | Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques |
title_fullStr | Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques |
title_full_unstemmed | Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques |
title_short | Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques |
title_sort | critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3906045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2365 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aghaeepournima criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques AT finakgreg criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques AT criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques AT criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques AT hoosholger criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques AT mosmanntimr criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques AT brinkmanryan criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques AT gottardoraphael criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques AT scheuermannrichardh criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques |