Cargando…

Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques

Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (Fl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aghaeepour, Nima, Finak, Greg, Hoos, Holger, Mosmann, Tim R, Brinkman, Ryan, Gottardo, Raphael, Scheuermann, Richard H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group US 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3906045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2365
_version_ 1782301426652807168
author Aghaeepour, Nima
Finak, Greg
Hoos, Holger
Mosmann, Tim R
Brinkman, Ryan
Gottardo, Raphael
Scheuermann, Richard H
author_facet Aghaeepour, Nima
Finak, Greg
Hoos, Holger
Mosmann, Tim R
Brinkman, Ryan
Gottardo, Raphael
Scheuermann, Richard H
author_sort Aghaeepour, Nima
collection PubMed
description Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods have reached a sufficient level of maturity and accuracy for reliable use in FCM data analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2365) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3906045
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Nature Publishing Group US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39060452014-01-29 Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques Aghaeepour, Nima Finak, Greg Hoos, Holger Mosmann, Tim R Brinkman, Ryan Gottardo, Raphael Scheuermann, Richard H Nat Methods Article Traditional methods for flow cytometry (FCM) data processing rely on subjective manual gating. Recently, several groups have developed computational methods for identifying cell populations in multidimensional FCM data. The Flow Cytometry: Critical Assessment of Population Identification Methods (FlowCAP) challenges were established to compare the performance of these methods on two tasks: (i) mammalian cell population identification, to determine whether automated algorithms can reproduce expert manual gating and (ii) sample classification, to determine whether analysis pipelines can identify characteristics that correlate with external variables (such as clinical outcome). This analysis presents the results of the first FlowCAP challenges. Several methods performed well as compared to manual gating or external variables using statistical performance measures, which suggests that automated methods have reached a sufficient level of maturity and accuracy for reliable use in FCM data analysis. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version of this article (doi:10.1038/nmeth.2365) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Nature Publishing Group US 2013-02-10 2013 /pmc/articles/PMC3906045/ /pubmed/23396282 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2365 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Article
Aghaeepour, Nima
Finak, Greg
Hoos, Holger
Mosmann, Tim R
Brinkman, Ryan
Gottardo, Raphael
Scheuermann, Richard H
Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
title Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
title_full Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
title_fullStr Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
title_full_unstemmed Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
title_short Critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
title_sort critical assessment of automated flow cytometry data analysis techniques
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3906045/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23396282
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2365
work_keys_str_mv AT aghaeepournima criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques
AT finakgreg criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques
AT criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques
AT criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques
AT hoosholger criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques
AT mosmanntimr criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques
AT brinkmanryan criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques
AT gottardoraphael criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques
AT scheuermannrichardh criticalassessmentofautomatedflowcytometrydataanalysistechniques