Cargando…

Is the Water Footprint an Appropriate Tool for Forestry and Forest Products: The Fennoscandian Case

The water footprint by the Water Footprint Network (WF) is an ambitious tool for measuring human appropriation and promoting sustainable use of fresh water. Using recent case studies and examples from water-abundant Fennoscandia, we consider whether it is an appropriate tool for evaluating the water...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Launiainen, Samuli, Futter, Martyn N., Ellison, David, Clarke, Nicholas, Finér, Leena, Högbom, Lars, Laurén, Ari, Ring, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3906478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23420472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0380-z
_version_ 1782301482195877888
author Launiainen, Samuli
Futter, Martyn N.
Ellison, David
Clarke, Nicholas
Finér, Leena
Högbom, Lars
Laurén, Ari
Ring, Eva
author_facet Launiainen, Samuli
Futter, Martyn N.
Ellison, David
Clarke, Nicholas
Finér, Leena
Högbom, Lars
Laurén, Ari
Ring, Eva
author_sort Launiainen, Samuli
collection PubMed
description The water footprint by the Water Footprint Network (WF) is an ambitious tool for measuring human appropriation and promoting sustainable use of fresh water. Using recent case studies and examples from water-abundant Fennoscandia, we consider whether it is an appropriate tool for evaluating the water use of forestry and forest-based products. We show that aggregating catchment level water consumption over a product life cycle does not consider fresh water as a renewable resource and is inconsistent with the principles of the hydrologic cycle. Currently, the WF assumes that all evapotranspiration (ET) from forests is a human appropriation of water although ET from managed forests in Fennoscandia is indistinguishable from that of unmanaged forests. We suggest that ET should not be included in the water footprint of rain-fed forestry and forest-based products. Tools for sustainable water management should always contextualize water use and water impacts with local water availability and environmental sensitivity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3906478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39064782014-02-03 Is the Water Footprint an Appropriate Tool for Forestry and Forest Products: The Fennoscandian Case Launiainen, Samuli Futter, Martyn N. Ellison, David Clarke, Nicholas Finér, Leena Högbom, Lars Laurén, Ari Ring, Eva Ambio Review The water footprint by the Water Footprint Network (WF) is an ambitious tool for measuring human appropriation and promoting sustainable use of fresh water. Using recent case studies and examples from water-abundant Fennoscandia, we consider whether it is an appropriate tool for evaluating the water use of forestry and forest-based products. We show that aggregating catchment level water consumption over a product life cycle does not consider fresh water as a renewable resource and is inconsistent with the principles of the hydrologic cycle. Currently, the WF assumes that all evapotranspiration (ET) from forests is a human appropriation of water although ET from managed forests in Fennoscandia is indistinguishable from that of unmanaged forests. We suggest that ET should not be included in the water footprint of rain-fed forestry and forest-based products. Tools for sustainable water management should always contextualize water use and water impacts with local water availability and environmental sensitivity. Springer Netherlands 2013-02-19 2014-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3906478/ /pubmed/23420472 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0380-z Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Launiainen, Samuli
Futter, Martyn N.
Ellison, David
Clarke, Nicholas
Finér, Leena
Högbom, Lars
Laurén, Ari
Ring, Eva
Is the Water Footprint an Appropriate Tool for Forestry and Forest Products: The Fennoscandian Case
title Is the Water Footprint an Appropriate Tool for Forestry and Forest Products: The Fennoscandian Case
title_full Is the Water Footprint an Appropriate Tool for Forestry and Forest Products: The Fennoscandian Case
title_fullStr Is the Water Footprint an Appropriate Tool for Forestry and Forest Products: The Fennoscandian Case
title_full_unstemmed Is the Water Footprint an Appropriate Tool for Forestry and Forest Products: The Fennoscandian Case
title_short Is the Water Footprint an Appropriate Tool for Forestry and Forest Products: The Fennoscandian Case
title_sort is the water footprint an appropriate tool for forestry and forest products: the fennoscandian case
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3906478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23420472
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0380-z
work_keys_str_mv AT launiainensamuli isthewaterfootprintanappropriatetoolforforestryandforestproductsthefennoscandiancase
AT futtermartynn isthewaterfootprintanappropriatetoolforforestryandforestproductsthefennoscandiancase
AT ellisondavid isthewaterfootprintanappropriatetoolforforestryandforestproductsthefennoscandiancase
AT clarkenicholas isthewaterfootprintanappropriatetoolforforestryandforestproductsthefennoscandiancase
AT finerleena isthewaterfootprintanappropriatetoolforforestryandforestproductsthefennoscandiancase
AT hogbomlars isthewaterfootprintanappropriatetoolforforestryandforestproductsthefennoscandiancase
AT laurenari isthewaterfootprintanappropriatetoolforforestryandforestproductsthefennoscandiancase
AT ringeva isthewaterfootprintanappropriatetoolforforestryandforestproductsthefennoscandiancase