Cargando…
The interaction of feature and space based orienting within the attention set
The processing of sensory information relies on interacting mechanisms of sustained attention and attentional capture, both of which operate in space and on object features. While evidence indicates that exogenous attentional capture, a mechanism previously understood to be automatic, can be elimina...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3906572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24523682 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00009 |
_version_ | 1782301494884696064 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Ahnate Sinnett, Scott |
author_facet | Lim, Ahnate Sinnett, Scott |
author_sort | Lim, Ahnate |
collection | PubMed |
description | The processing of sensory information relies on interacting mechanisms of sustained attention and attentional capture, both of which operate in space and on object features. While evidence indicates that exogenous attentional capture, a mechanism previously understood to be automatic, can be eliminated while concurrently performing a demanding task, we reframe this phenomenon within the theoretical framework of the “attention set” (Most et al., 2005). Consequently, the specific prediction that cuing effects should reappear when feature dimensions of the cue overlap with those in the attention set (i.e., elements of the demanding task) was empirically tested and confirmed using a dual-task paradigm involving both sustained attention and attentional capture, adapted from Santangelo et al. (2007). Participants were required to either detect a centrally presented target presented in a stream of distractors (the primary task), or respond to a spatially cued target (the secondary task). Importantly, the spatial cue could either share features with the target in the centrally presented primary task, or not share any features. Overall, the findings supported the attention set hypothesis showing that a spatial cuing effect was only observed when the peripheral cue shared a feature with objects that were already in the attention set (i.e., the primary task). However, this finding was accompanied by differential attentional orienting dependent on the different types of objects within the attention set, with feature-based orienting occurring for target-related objects, and additional spatial-based orienting for distractor-related objects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3906572 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39065722014-02-12 The interaction of feature and space based orienting within the attention set Lim, Ahnate Sinnett, Scott Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience The processing of sensory information relies on interacting mechanisms of sustained attention and attentional capture, both of which operate in space and on object features. While evidence indicates that exogenous attentional capture, a mechanism previously understood to be automatic, can be eliminated while concurrently performing a demanding task, we reframe this phenomenon within the theoretical framework of the “attention set” (Most et al., 2005). Consequently, the specific prediction that cuing effects should reappear when feature dimensions of the cue overlap with those in the attention set (i.e., elements of the demanding task) was empirically tested and confirmed using a dual-task paradigm involving both sustained attention and attentional capture, adapted from Santangelo et al. (2007). Participants were required to either detect a centrally presented target presented in a stream of distractors (the primary task), or respond to a spatially cued target (the secondary task). Importantly, the spatial cue could either share features with the target in the centrally presented primary task, or not share any features. Overall, the findings supported the attention set hypothesis showing that a spatial cuing effect was only observed when the peripheral cue shared a feature with objects that were already in the attention set (i.e., the primary task). However, this finding was accompanied by differential attentional orienting dependent on the different types of objects within the attention set, with feature-based orienting occurring for target-related objects, and additional spatial-based orienting for distractor-related objects. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3906572/ /pubmed/24523682 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00009 Text en Copyright © 2014 Lim and Sinnett. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Lim, Ahnate Sinnett, Scott The interaction of feature and space based orienting within the attention set |
title | The interaction of feature and space based orienting within the attention set |
title_full | The interaction of feature and space based orienting within the attention set |
title_fullStr | The interaction of feature and space based orienting within the attention set |
title_full_unstemmed | The interaction of feature and space based orienting within the attention set |
title_short | The interaction of feature and space based orienting within the attention set |
title_sort | interaction of feature and space based orienting within the attention set |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3906572/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24523682 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2014.00009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limahnate theinteractionoffeatureandspacebasedorientingwithintheattentionset AT sinnettscott theinteractionoffeatureandspacebasedorientingwithintheattentionset AT limahnate interactionoffeatureandspacebasedorientingwithintheattentionset AT sinnettscott interactionoffeatureandspacebasedorientingwithintheattentionset |