Cargando…

A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes

BACKGROUND: Flip-flops and sandals are popular choices of footwear due to their convenience. However, the effects of these types of footwear on lower extremity biomechanics are still poorly understood. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate differences in ground reaction force (GR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiuli, Paquette, Max R, Zhang, Songning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24196492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-45
_version_ 1782301569165819904
author Zhang, Xiuli
Paquette, Max R
Zhang, Songning
author_facet Zhang, Xiuli
Paquette, Max R
Zhang, Songning
author_sort Zhang, Xiuli
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Flip-flops and sandals are popular choices of footwear due to their convenience. However, the effects of these types of footwear on lower extremity biomechanics are still poorly understood. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate differences in ground reaction force (GRF), center of pressure (COP) and lower extremity joint kinematic and kinetic variables during level-walking in flip-flops, sandals and barefoot compared to running shoes. METHODS: Ten healthy males performed five walking trials in the four footwear conditions at 1.3 m/s. Three-dimensional GRF and kinematic data were simultaneously collected. RESULTS: A smaller loading rate of the 1st peak vertical GRF and peak propulsive GRF and greater peak dorsiflexion moment in early stance were found in shoes compared to barefoot, flip-flops and sandals. Barefoot walking yielded greater mediolateral COP displacement, flatter foot contact angle, increased ankle plantarflexion contact angle, and smaller knee flexion contact angle and range of motion compared to all other footwear. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study indicate that barefoot, flip-flops and sandals produced different peak GRF variables and ankle moment compared to shoes while all footwear yield different COP and ankle and knee kinematics compared to barefoot. The findings may be helpful to researchers and clinicians in understanding lower extremity mechanics of open-toe footwear.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3907140
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39071402014-01-31 A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes Zhang, Xiuli Paquette, Max R Zhang, Songning J Foot Ankle Res Research BACKGROUND: Flip-flops and sandals are popular choices of footwear due to their convenience. However, the effects of these types of footwear on lower extremity biomechanics are still poorly understood. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate differences in ground reaction force (GRF), center of pressure (COP) and lower extremity joint kinematic and kinetic variables during level-walking in flip-flops, sandals and barefoot compared to running shoes. METHODS: Ten healthy males performed five walking trials in the four footwear conditions at 1.3 m/s. Three-dimensional GRF and kinematic data were simultaneously collected. RESULTS: A smaller loading rate of the 1st peak vertical GRF and peak propulsive GRF and greater peak dorsiflexion moment in early stance were found in shoes compared to barefoot, flip-flops and sandals. Barefoot walking yielded greater mediolateral COP displacement, flatter foot contact angle, increased ankle plantarflexion contact angle, and smaller knee flexion contact angle and range of motion compared to all other footwear. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study indicate that barefoot, flip-flops and sandals produced different peak GRF variables and ankle moment compared to shoes while all footwear yield different COP and ankle and knee kinematics compared to barefoot. The findings may be helpful to researchers and clinicians in understanding lower extremity mechanics of open-toe footwear. BioMed Central 2013-11-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3907140/ /pubmed/24196492 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-45 Text en Copyright © 2013 Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Xiuli
Paquette, Max R
Zhang, Songning
A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes
title A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes
title_full A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes
title_fullStr A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes
title_short A comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes
title_sort comparison of gait biomechanics of flip-flops, sandals, barefoot and shoes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907140/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24196492
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-45
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiuli acomparisonofgaitbiomechanicsofflipflopssandalsbarefootandshoes
AT paquettemaxr acomparisonofgaitbiomechanicsofflipflopssandalsbarefootandshoes
AT zhangsongning acomparisonofgaitbiomechanicsofflipflopssandalsbarefootandshoes
AT zhangxiuli comparisonofgaitbiomechanicsofflipflopssandalsbarefootandshoes
AT paquettemaxr comparisonofgaitbiomechanicsofflipflopssandalsbarefootandshoes
AT zhangsongning comparisonofgaitbiomechanicsofflipflopssandalsbarefootandshoes