Cargando…

Intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: do health professionals choose convenience or risk?

BACKGROUND: The randomized TARGIT trial comparing experimental intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) to up to 7 weeks of daily conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) recruited participants in Western Australia between 2003 and 2012. We aimed to understand preferences for this evolving radiothe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Corica, Tammy, Joseph, David, Saunders, Christobel, Bulsara, Max, Nowak, Anna K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24461031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-33
_version_ 1782301569833762816
author Corica, Tammy
Joseph, David
Saunders, Christobel
Bulsara, Max
Nowak, Anna K
author_facet Corica, Tammy
Joseph, David
Saunders, Christobel
Bulsara, Max
Nowak, Anna K
author_sort Corica, Tammy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The randomized TARGIT trial comparing experimental intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) to up to 7 weeks of daily conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) recruited participants in Western Australia between 2003 and 2012. We aimed to understand preferences for this evolving radiotherapy treatment for early breast cancer (EBC) in health professionals, and how they changed over time and in response to emerging data. Preferences for single dose IORT or EBRT for EBC were elicited in 2004 and 2011, together with factors that may be associated with these preferences. METHODS: Western Australian health professionals working with breast cancer patients were invited to complete a validated, self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire used hypothetical scenarios and trade-off methodology to determine the maximum increase in risk of local recurrence health professionals were willing to accept in order to have a single dose of IORT in the place of EBRT if they were faced with this decision themselves. RESULTS: Health professional characteristics were similar across the two time points although 2011 included a higher number of nurse (49% vs. 36%) and allied health (10% vs. 4%) participants and a lower number of radiation therapists (17% vs. 32% ) compared to 2004. Health professional preferences varied, with 7.5% and 3% judging IORT unacceptable at any risk, 18% and 21% judging IORT acceptable only if offering an equivalent risk, 56% and 59% judging IORT acceptable with a low maximum increase in risk (1-3%) and 19% and 17% judging a high maximum increase in risk acceptable (4-5%), in 2004 and 2011 respectively. A significantly greater number of nurses accepted IORT as a treatment option in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Most Western Australian health professionals working with breast cancer patients are willing to accept an increase in risk of local recurrence in order to replace EBRT with IORT in a hypothetical setting. This finding was consistent over two time points spanning 7 years despite the duration of clinical experience with IORT and the publication of the early clinical results of IORT in 2010. These results need to be compared with preferences elicited from patient groups, and further investigation into the impact of personal preferences on health professionals’ advice to patients is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3907143
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39071432014-01-31 Intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: do health professionals choose convenience or risk? Corica, Tammy Joseph, David Saunders, Christobel Bulsara, Max Nowak, Anna K Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The randomized TARGIT trial comparing experimental intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT) to up to 7 weeks of daily conventional external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) recruited participants in Western Australia between 2003 and 2012. We aimed to understand preferences for this evolving radiotherapy treatment for early breast cancer (EBC) in health professionals, and how they changed over time and in response to emerging data. Preferences for single dose IORT or EBRT for EBC were elicited in 2004 and 2011, together with factors that may be associated with these preferences. METHODS: Western Australian health professionals working with breast cancer patients were invited to complete a validated, self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire used hypothetical scenarios and trade-off methodology to determine the maximum increase in risk of local recurrence health professionals were willing to accept in order to have a single dose of IORT in the place of EBRT if they were faced with this decision themselves. RESULTS: Health professional characteristics were similar across the two time points although 2011 included a higher number of nurse (49% vs. 36%) and allied health (10% vs. 4%) participants and a lower number of radiation therapists (17% vs. 32% ) compared to 2004. Health professional preferences varied, with 7.5% and 3% judging IORT unacceptable at any risk, 18% and 21% judging IORT acceptable only if offering an equivalent risk, 56% and 59% judging IORT acceptable with a low maximum increase in risk (1-3%) and 19% and 17% judging a high maximum increase in risk acceptable (4-5%), in 2004 and 2011 respectively. A significantly greater number of nurses accepted IORT as a treatment option in 2011. CONCLUSIONS: Most Western Australian health professionals working with breast cancer patients are willing to accept an increase in risk of local recurrence in order to replace EBRT with IORT in a hypothetical setting. This finding was consistent over two time points spanning 7 years despite the duration of clinical experience with IORT and the publication of the early clinical results of IORT in 2010. These results need to be compared with preferences elicited from patient groups, and further investigation into the impact of personal preferences on health professionals’ advice to patients is warranted. BioMed Central 2014-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3907143/ /pubmed/24461031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-33 Text en Copyright © 2014 Corica et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Corica, Tammy
Joseph, David
Saunders, Christobel
Bulsara, Max
Nowak, Anna K
Intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: do health professionals choose convenience or risk?
title Intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: do health professionals choose convenience or risk?
title_full Intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: do health professionals choose convenience or risk?
title_fullStr Intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: do health professionals choose convenience or risk?
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: do health professionals choose convenience or risk?
title_short Intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: do health professionals choose convenience or risk?
title_sort intraoperative radiotherapy for early breast cancer: do health professionals choose convenience or risk?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907143/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24461031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-9-33
work_keys_str_mv AT coricatammy intraoperativeradiotherapyforearlybreastcancerdohealthprofessionalschooseconvenienceorrisk
AT josephdavid intraoperativeradiotherapyforearlybreastcancerdohealthprofessionalschooseconvenienceorrisk
AT saunderschristobel intraoperativeradiotherapyforearlybreastcancerdohealthprofessionalschooseconvenienceorrisk
AT bulsaramax intraoperativeradiotherapyforearlybreastcancerdohealthprofessionalschooseconvenienceorrisk
AT nowakannak intraoperativeradiotherapyforearlybreastcancerdohealthprofessionalschooseconvenienceorrisk