Cargando…

Paging Doctor Google! Heuristics vs. technology

The most dramatic development in medical decision-making technology has been the advent of the Internet. This has had an impact not only on clinicians, but has also become an important resource for patients who often approach their doctors with medical information they have obtained from the Interne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jhaveri, Kenar D, Schrier, Peter B, Mattana, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000Research 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627777
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-90.v2
_version_ 1782301572992073728
author Jhaveri, Kenar D
Schrier, Peter B
Mattana, Joseph
author_facet Jhaveri, Kenar D
Schrier, Peter B
Mattana, Joseph
author_sort Jhaveri, Kenar D
collection PubMed
description The most dramatic development in medical decision-making technology has been the advent of the Internet. This has had an impact not only on clinicians, but has also become an important resource for patients who often approach their doctors with medical information they have obtained from the Internet.  Increasingly, medical students, residents and attending physicians have been using the Internet as a tool for diagnosing and treating disease. Internet-based resources that are available take various forms, including informational websites, online journals and textbooks, and social media.  Search engines such as Google have been increasingly used to help in making diagnoses of disease entities. Do these search methods fare better than experienced heuristic methods? In a small study, we examined the comparative role of heuristics versus the 'Google' mode of thinking. Internal medicine residents were asked to “google” key words to come up with a diagnosis. Their results were compared to experienced nephrology faculty and fellows in training using heuristics and no additional help of internet. Overall, with the aid of Google, the novices (internal medicine residents) correctly diagnosed renal diseases less often than the experts (the attendings) but with the same frequency as the intermediates (nephrology fellows).  However, in a subgroup analysis of both common diseases and rare diseases, the novices correctly diagnosed renal diseases less often than the experts but more often than the intermediates in each analysis.  The novices correctly diagnosed renal diseases with the same frequency as nephrology fellows in training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3907161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher F1000Research
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39071612014-03-12 Paging Doctor Google! Heuristics vs. technology Jhaveri, Kenar D Schrier, Peter B Mattana, Joseph F1000Res Short Research Article The most dramatic development in medical decision-making technology has been the advent of the Internet. This has had an impact not only on clinicians, but has also become an important resource for patients who often approach their doctors with medical information they have obtained from the Internet.  Increasingly, medical students, residents and attending physicians have been using the Internet as a tool for diagnosing and treating disease. Internet-based resources that are available take various forms, including informational websites, online journals and textbooks, and social media.  Search engines such as Google have been increasingly used to help in making diagnoses of disease entities. Do these search methods fare better than experienced heuristic methods? In a small study, we examined the comparative role of heuristics versus the 'Google' mode of thinking. Internal medicine residents were asked to “google” key words to come up with a diagnosis. Their results were compared to experienced nephrology faculty and fellows in training using heuristics and no additional help of internet. Overall, with the aid of Google, the novices (internal medicine residents) correctly diagnosed renal diseases less often than the experts (the attendings) but with the same frequency as the intermediates (nephrology fellows).  However, in a subgroup analysis of both common diseases and rare diseases, the novices correctly diagnosed renal diseases less often than the experts but more often than the intermediates in each analysis.  The novices correctly diagnosed renal diseases with the same frequency as nephrology fellows in training. F1000Research 2013-04-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3907161/ /pubmed/24627777 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-90.v2 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Jhaveri KD et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ Data associated with the article are available under the terms of the Creative Commons Zero "No rights reserved" data waiver (CC0 1.0 Public domain dedication).
spellingShingle Short Research Article
Jhaveri, Kenar D
Schrier, Peter B
Mattana, Joseph
Paging Doctor Google! Heuristics vs. technology
title Paging Doctor Google! Heuristics vs. technology
title_full Paging Doctor Google! Heuristics vs. technology
title_fullStr Paging Doctor Google! Heuristics vs. technology
title_full_unstemmed Paging Doctor Google! Heuristics vs. technology
title_short Paging Doctor Google! Heuristics vs. technology
title_sort paging doctor google! heuristics vs. technology
topic Short Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3907161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627777
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.2-90.v2
work_keys_str_mv AT jhaverikenard pagingdoctorgoogleheuristicsvstechnology
AT schrierpeterb pagingdoctorgoogleheuristicsvstechnology
AT mattanajoseph pagingdoctorgoogleheuristicsvstechnology